Low-cost chest paediatric phantom for dose optimisation: construction and validation

A. Mohammed Ali , S. Al-Murshedi
{"title":"Low-cost chest paediatric phantom for dose optimisation: construction and validation","authors":"A. Mohammed Ali ,&nbsp;S. Al-Murshedi","doi":"10.1016/j.rxeng.2022.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>In order to perform chest dose optimisation studies, the imaging phantom should be adequate for image quality evaluation. Since high-end phantoms are cost prohibitive, there is a need for a low-cost construction method with fairly available tissue substitutes.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p><span>Theoretical calculations of radiological characteristics were performed for each of lung, cortical bone and soft tissues in order to choose appropriate substitute, then, cork, P.V.C. (Polyvinyl chloride) and water were chosen, respectively. Validation included, firstly, measuring CT Hounsfield Units (HU) of a real patient’s tissues then compared against their corresponding </span>anatomies in the constructed phantom. Secondly, Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values were acquired in this study to evaluate the quality of images generated from the constructed phantom, then, compare their trends with a valid phantom under different exposure parameters (kVp and mAs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From theoretical calculations, the percentage differences showed high accuracy of tissue substitutes when simulating real patient tissues; P.V.C. was ≥5.78%, cork was ≥4.46% and water ≥5%. The percentage difference (CT HU) between lung and cortical bone and their equivalent tissue substitutes were 10.44% and 0.53%–3.17%, respectively. Strong positive correlations were found for SNR when changing both kVp (0.79) and mAs (0.65). While the correlation strength of CNR values were found to be moderate when changing both kVp (0.58) and mAs (0.53).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our low-cost phantom approved through CT HU that their materials replicate the radiological characteristics of real one-year-old child while SNR and SNR correlations confirmed its applicability in imaging and optimisation studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94185,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510723000149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

In order to perform chest dose optimisation studies, the imaging phantom should be adequate for image quality evaluation. Since high-end phantoms are cost prohibitive, there is a need for a low-cost construction method with fairly available tissue substitutes.

Materials and methods

Theoretical calculations of radiological characteristics were performed for each of lung, cortical bone and soft tissues in order to choose appropriate substitute, then, cork, P.V.C. (Polyvinyl chloride) and water were chosen, respectively. Validation included, firstly, measuring CT Hounsfield Units (HU) of a real patient’s tissues then compared against their corresponding anatomies in the constructed phantom. Secondly, Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values were acquired in this study to evaluate the quality of images generated from the constructed phantom, then, compare their trends with a valid phantom under different exposure parameters (kVp and mAs).

Results

From theoretical calculations, the percentage differences showed high accuracy of tissue substitutes when simulating real patient tissues; P.V.C. was ≥5.78%, cork was ≥4.46% and water ≥5%. The percentage difference (CT HU) between lung and cortical bone and their equivalent tissue substitutes were 10.44% and 0.53%–3.17%, respectively. Strong positive correlations were found for SNR when changing both kVp (0.79) and mAs (0.65). While the correlation strength of CNR values were found to be moderate when changing both kVp (0.58) and mAs (0.53).

Conclusions

Our low-cost phantom approved through CT HU that their materials replicate the radiological characteristics of real one-year-old child while SNR and SNR correlations confirmed its applicability in imaging and optimisation studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于剂量优化的低成本儿科胸部假体:构建和验证
引言和目的为了进行胸部剂量优化研究,成像体模应足以进行图像质量评估。由于高端模型的成本过高,因此需要一种具有相当可用的组织替代品的低成本构建方法。材料和方法对肺、皮质骨和软组织的放射学特征进行理论计算,以选择合适的替代品,然后分别选择软木、聚氯乙烯和水。验证包括,首先测量真实患者组织的CT Hounsfield单位(HU),然后将其与构建的体模中的相应解剖结构进行比较。其次,本研究获得了信噪比(SNR)和对比度噪声比(CNR)值,以评估所构建的体模产生的图像质量,然后将它们在不同曝光参数(kVp和mAs)下的趋势与有效体模进行比较,百分比差异表明,当模拟真实的患者组织时,组织替代物的准确性很高;P.V.C.≥5.78%,软木≥4.46%,水≥5%。肺和皮质骨及其等效组织替代物之间的百分比差异(CT-HU)分别为10.44%和0.53%~3.17%。当同时改变kVp(0.79)和mAs(0.65)时,SNR值呈强正相关。而当同时改变kVp(0.58)和mAs(0.53)时,CNR值的相关强度中等。结论我们的低成本体模通过CT HU批准其材料复制了真实一岁儿童的放射学特征,而SNR和SNR相关性证实了它在成像和优化研究中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usefulness of the superior orbitomeatal line without the lens included in the scan range at different tube voltage during pediatric head CT Magnetic resonance imaging findings for inflammatory mastitis of unknown etiology Updating the rules for Scientific Letters and Brief Reports Contrast-enhanced mammography and preoperative magnetic seed placement in breast cancer patients for the detection of residual disease following neoadjuvant systemic therapy The legal regulation of artificial intelligence in the European Union: A practical guide for radiologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1