Manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at different print orientations by using a stereolithography printer

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.04.012
Marta Revilla-León DDS, MSD, PhD , Elisabeth Fry , Achara Supaphakorn , Abdul B. Barmak MD, MSc, EdD , John C. Kois DDS, MSD
{"title":"Manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at different print orientations by using a stereolithography printer","authors":"Marta Revilla-León DDS, MSD, PhD ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Fry ,&nbsp;Achara Supaphakorn ,&nbsp;Abdul B. Barmak MD, MSc, EdD ,&nbsp;John C. Kois DDS, MSD","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>Stereolithography (SLA) procedures can be chosen for manufacturing definitive crowns; however, how the print orientation impacts the trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the printed definitive restorations is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to calculate the manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of SLA definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at varying print orientations (0, 45, 75, or 90 degrees).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>The standard tessellation language (STL) file of an anatomic contour molar crown was obtained and used to fabricate all the crowns by using a definitive resin-ceramic material (Permanent Crown) and an SLA printer (Form 3B+). Four groups were developed depending on the print orientation selected to manufacture the crowns: 0-, 45-, 70-, and 90-degree print orientation (n=30). Each crown specimen was digitized without the use of scanning powder by using a desktop scanner (T710). The crown design file was determined as the reference (control) group and used to calculate the fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the specimens using the root mean square (RMS) error computation. Trueness data were examined by using 1-way ANOVA and post hoc pairwise multiple comparison Tukey tests, while precision data were analyzed using the Levene test (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean ±standard deviation RMS error discrepancies ranged from 37 ±3 μm to 113 ±11 μm. One-way ANOVA exposed significant trueness (<em>P</em>&lt;.001) differences among the groups considered in this study. Furthermore, all the print orientation groups tested were different from each other (<em>P</em>&lt;.001). The 0-degree group presented the best trueness value (37 μm), while the 90-degree group obtained the worst trueness value (113 μm). The Levene test exposed significant precision differences among the groups assessed (<em>P</em>&lt;.001). The 0-degree group had a significantly lower standard deviation (higher precision) (3 μm) than the other groups, with no difference among the other groups tested (<em>P</em>&gt;.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the SLA resin-ceramic crowns was impacted by the varying print orientations assessed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"133 2","pages":"Pages 505-511"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391323002676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem

Stereolithography (SLA) procedures can be chosen for manufacturing definitive crowns; however, how the print orientation impacts the trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the printed definitive restorations is unclear.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to calculate the manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of SLA definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at varying print orientations (0, 45, 75, or 90 degrees).

Material and methods

The standard tessellation language (STL) file of an anatomic contour molar crown was obtained and used to fabricate all the crowns by using a definitive resin-ceramic material (Permanent Crown) and an SLA printer (Form 3B+). Four groups were developed depending on the print orientation selected to manufacture the crowns: 0-, 45-, 70-, and 90-degree print orientation (n=30). Each crown specimen was digitized without the use of scanning powder by using a desktop scanner (T710). The crown design file was determined as the reference (control) group and used to calculate the fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the specimens using the root mean square (RMS) error computation. Trueness data were examined by using 1-way ANOVA and post hoc pairwise multiple comparison Tukey tests, while precision data were analyzed using the Levene test (α=.05).

Results

The mean ±standard deviation RMS error discrepancies ranged from 37 ±3 μm to 113 ±11 μm. One-way ANOVA exposed significant trueness (P<.001) differences among the groups considered in this study. Furthermore, all the print orientation groups tested were different from each other (P<.001). The 0-degree group presented the best trueness value (37 μm), while the 90-degree group obtained the worst trueness value (113 μm). The Levene test exposed significant precision differences among the groups assessed (P<.001). The 0-degree group had a significantly lower standard deviation (higher precision) (3 μm) than the other groups, with no difference among the other groups tested (P>.05).

Conclusions

The fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the SLA resin-ceramic crowns was impacted by the varying print orientations assessed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用立体光刻机在不同印刷方向上制作树脂陶瓷冠的凹版表面的制造精度
问题说明立体光刻(SLA)程序可用于制造最终冠;然而,印刷方向如何影响印刷最终修复的凹版表面的真实性和精度尚不清楚。目的:计算不同打印方向(0度、45度、75度和90度)下SLA树脂陶瓷冠凹版表面的制作精度。材料和方法获得解剖轮廓磨牙冠的标准镶嵌语言(STL)文件,并使用确定的树脂陶瓷材料(永久牙冠)和SLA打印机(表格3B+)制作所有牙冠。根据制作冠的打印方向分为四组:0度、45度、70度和90度打印方向(n=30)。每个冠标本不使用扫描粉,使用台式扫描仪(T710)数字化。以冠形设计文件为参照(对照)组,采用均方根误差(RMS)计算方法计算试样凹版表面的加工真度和精度。真度资料采用单因素方差分析和事后两两多重比较Tukey检验,精密度资料采用Levene检验(α= 0.05)。结果平均±标准差RMS误差范围为37±3 μm ~ 113±11 μm。单因素方差分析显示本研究中考虑的组之间存在显著的真实性差异(P<.001)。此外,所有测试的打印方向组之间存在差异(P<.001)。0度组的真实度最佳(37 μm), 90度组的真实度最差(113 μm)。Levene检验显示评估组之间的精确度有显著差异(P<.001)。0度组的标准偏差(精度)显著低于其他组(3 μm),其他组之间无差异(P> 0.05)。结论不同的打印方向影响SLA树脂陶瓷冠凹版面制作的准确性和精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Do color stability and translucency differ between 3D printed and milled resin-based fixed dental restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dimensional accuracy and internal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by additive and subtractive manufacturing using polymer-based and ceramic restorative materials. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of complete arch implant scanning techniques performed extraorally: Reverse impression and extraoral photogrammetry methods. Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. Response to Letter to the Editor on the Manuscript, "Comparing the performance of ChatGPT 4o, DeepSeek R1, and Gemini 2 Pro in answering fixed prosthodontics questions over time". Effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength between light-polymerized hard chairside relining material and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milled denture base materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1