[The model of co-production in mental health services].

Q3 Medicine Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI:10.22365/jpsych.2022.070
Evanthia Sakellari, Konstantinos Tsoukas, Gerasimos Kolaitis, Areti Lagiou
{"title":"[The model of co-production in mental health services].","authors":"Evanthia Sakellari, Konstantinos Tsoukas, Gerasimos Kolaitis, Areti Lagiou","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2022.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Service users' right to be involved in decisions concerning their health and quality of life is not only an ethical issue, but also a key aspect for the efficiency and effectiveness of services in modern health systems. Through co-production, service users have an equal partner position in a comprehensive process that includes services design, provision and evaluation. The co-production model is not a new concept but an emerging idea for health services and in particular mental health services. This model is governed by basic principles and values, such as recognizing individuals as active and equal participants with valuable experiences, taking advantage of existing opportunities, sharing and mutual understanding, peer support, tackling discrimination, and facilitation instead of just services provision. Τhe benefits are many and important, both for users (i.e. enhancing trust in services, reducing stigma), and for health professionals and settings (i.e., extroversion and dissemination, increasing needs understanding, changing professionals' attitudes, more efficient use of resources). However, there are limitations which should be considered when co-production is implemented. Regarding co-production, the literature is relatively limited; while there is a plethora of publications on the concepts related to co-production and its principles (e.g., empowerment, advocacy, recovery, etc.). The adoption of the co-production approach in Greece could benefit significantly the mental health services, within the psychiatric reform by establishing an equal relationship between professionals and service users.","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2022.070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Service users' right to be involved in decisions concerning their health and quality of life is not only an ethical issue, but also a key aspect for the efficiency and effectiveness of services in modern health systems. Through co-production, service users have an equal partner position in a comprehensive process that includes services design, provision and evaluation. The co-production model is not a new concept but an emerging idea for health services and in particular mental health services. This model is governed by basic principles and values, such as recognizing individuals as active and equal participants with valuable experiences, taking advantage of existing opportunities, sharing and mutual understanding, peer support, tackling discrimination, and facilitation instead of just services provision. Τhe benefits are many and important, both for users (i.e. enhancing trust in services, reducing stigma), and for health professionals and settings (i.e., extroversion and dissemination, increasing needs understanding, changing professionals' attitudes, more efficient use of resources). However, there are limitations which should be considered when co-production is implemented. Regarding co-production, the literature is relatively limited; while there is a plethora of publications on the concepts related to co-production and its principles (e.g., empowerment, advocacy, recovery, etc.). The adoption of the co-production approach in Greece could benefit significantly the mental health services, within the psychiatric reform by establishing an equal relationship between professionals and service users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[精神卫生服务的合作模式]。
服务使用者参与有关其健康和生活质量的决策的权利不仅是一个伦理问题,而且也是现代卫生系统中服务效率和效力的一个关键方面。通过合作生产,服务使用者在包括服务设计、提供和评价在内的全面过程中具有平等的伙伴地位。合作制作模式不是一个新概念,而是卫生服务,特别是精神卫生服务的一个新兴想法。这种模式以基本原则和价值观为指导,例如承认个人是具有宝贵经验的积极和平等参与者,利用现有机会,分享和相互理解,同伴支持,解决歧视问题,提供便利而不仅仅是提供服务。Τhe对用户(即加强对服务的信任,减少污名)以及卫生专业人员和环境(即外向性和传播,增加对需求的了解,改变专业人员的态度,更有效地利用资源)都有许多重要的好处。然而,在实施合拍片时,应该考虑到一些限制。关于合拍片,文献相对有限;虽然关于联合制作及其原则的概念(例如,授权、宣传、恢复等)的出版物过多。在希腊,通过在专业人员和服务使用者之间建立平等的关系,采用合作制作办法可以在精神病学改革范围内大大有利于精神卫生服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Parent Diabetes Distress Scale-Greek (PDDS-Gr). Knowledge, competence and educational needs of mental health staff on palliative care for the elderly with dementia. Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on subjective sleep during lockdown: relation with resilience characteristics. Results of esketamine administration in a Greek population; A case series. Effects of antipsychotic medications in glucose and lipid metabolism at the fasted state in drug-naïve first episode patients with psychosis after six months and three years of treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1