Fit for Purpose Assessment: A New Direction for IACUCs.

IF 3.1 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Ilar Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.1093/ilar/ilac006
Lewis B Kinter, David K Johnson, Robert H Weichbrod, Ernest D Prentice, Richard C Simmonds, Paul W Houghton, Robert A Whitney, Joseph DeGeorge, W Ron DeHaven, Klaas Kramer, Louis DeTolla
{"title":"Fit for Purpose Assessment: A New Direction for IACUCs.","authors":"Lewis B Kinter, David K Johnson, Robert H Weichbrod, Ernest D Prentice, Richard C Simmonds, Paul W Houghton, Robert A Whitney, Joseph DeGeorge, W Ron DeHaven, Klaas Kramer, Louis DeTolla","doi":"10.1093/ilar/ilac006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The organization and function of the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) is the key component of government regulation and oversight of necessary scientific research using live animals and of AAALAC - International accreditation of animal care and use programs in the United States. The regulations, roles, and responsibilities of IACUCs have evolved since their inception 35 years ago from a limited focus on animal welfare and specific animal procedures to embracing scientific quality, data reproducibility and translation, and animal welfare as inextricably interdependent and critical components of generation of new scientific knowledge and medical treatments. A current challenge for IACUCs is in evaluating whether benefits to be derived (eg, new knowledge or treatments) justify any unavoidable pain, stress, or injury associated with proposed research protocols, because the former are long-term and at best speculative outcomes, whereas the latter are immediate and tangible for the study animals. Scientific consensus is that research most likely to generate significant new knowledge and medical treatments is that conducted to high scientific, technical, and quality standards and reported with full transparency to facilitate reproducibility. As an alternative to current benefits evaluations included in risk benefit and harm benefit constructs, the authors propose that IACUCs assess the proposed research for scientific quality and alignment of study elements with the study purpose (e.g., Fit for Purpose [FfP]), including justifications for study design components, selection of primary endpoints and technologies, rationale for data and statistical analyses, and research communication plans. Fit for Purpose endpoints are objective, immediate, and impactful as are the potential risks for study animals, and at the same time they are the best predictors for achievement of longer-term benefits. We propose that IACUCs and any revision of The ILAR Guide consider FfP concepts in place of traditional benefits assessment to accelerate the generation of new knowledge and treatments benefiting medical and veterinary patients and the environment through better science and animal welfare rather than to continue to rely on speculative future outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56299,"journal":{"name":"Ilar Journal","volume":"62 3","pages":"314-331"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091468/pdf/ilac006.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilar Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilac006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The organization and function of the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) is the key component of government regulation and oversight of necessary scientific research using live animals and of AAALAC - International accreditation of animal care and use programs in the United States. The regulations, roles, and responsibilities of IACUCs have evolved since their inception 35 years ago from a limited focus on animal welfare and specific animal procedures to embracing scientific quality, data reproducibility and translation, and animal welfare as inextricably interdependent and critical components of generation of new scientific knowledge and medical treatments. A current challenge for IACUCs is in evaluating whether benefits to be derived (eg, new knowledge or treatments) justify any unavoidable pain, stress, or injury associated with proposed research protocols, because the former are long-term and at best speculative outcomes, whereas the latter are immediate and tangible for the study animals. Scientific consensus is that research most likely to generate significant new knowledge and medical treatments is that conducted to high scientific, technical, and quality standards and reported with full transparency to facilitate reproducibility. As an alternative to current benefits evaluations included in risk benefit and harm benefit constructs, the authors propose that IACUCs assess the proposed research for scientific quality and alignment of study elements with the study purpose (e.g., Fit for Purpose [FfP]), including justifications for study design components, selection of primary endpoints and technologies, rationale for data and statistical analyses, and research communication plans. Fit for Purpose endpoints are objective, immediate, and impactful as are the potential risks for study animals, and at the same time they are the best predictors for achievement of longer-term benefits. We propose that IACUCs and any revision of The ILAR Guide consider FfP concepts in place of traditional benefits assessment to accelerate the generation of new knowledge and treatments benefiting medical and veterinary patients and the environment through better science and animal welfare rather than to continue to rely on speculative future outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适合目的评估:IACUC 的新方向。
机构动物护理和使用委员会(IACUC)的组织和职能是政府监管和监督使用活体动物进行必要科学研究的关键组成部分,也是美国动物护理和使用项目国际认证(AAALAC)的关键组成部分。自 35 年前成立以来,IACUC 的法规、角色和职责不断演变,从最初仅关注动物福利和特定动物程序,发展到将科学质量、数据可重复性和转化以及动物福利视为产生新科学知识和医疗方法的密不可分、相互依存的重要组成部分。目前,IACUC 面临的一个挑战是,如何评估与拟议研究方案相关的任何不可避免的疼痛、压力或伤害是否能带来益处(如新知识或新疗法),因为前者是长期的,充其量只是推测结果,而后者对研究动物来说是直接的、有形的。科学界的共识是,最有可能产生重要新知识和医疗方法的研究,是那些按照高科学、技术和质量标准进行的研究,并以完全透明的方式进行报告,以促进可重复性。作为目前风险效益和危害效益结构中所包含的效益评估的替代方案,作者建议 IACUC 评估拟议研究的科学质量以及研究要素与研究目的的一致性(例如,"符合目的"[FfP]),包括研究设计组成部分的理由、主要终点和技术的选择、数据和统计分析的依据以及研究交流计划。与研究动物的潜在风险一样,"目的明确 "的终点是客观、直接和有影响的,同时也是实现长期效益的最佳预测指标。我们建议IACUC和《ILAR指南》的任何修订都应考虑FfP概念,以取代传统的效益评估,从而加快新知识和新疗法的产生,通过更好的科学和动物福利造福于医学和兽医学患者及环境,而不是继续依赖于推测的未来结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ilar Journal
Ilar Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: The ILAR Journal is the peer-reviewed, theme-oriented publication of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR), which provides timely information for all who study, use, care for, and oversee the use of animals in research. The journal publishes original articles that review research on animals either as direct subjects or as surrogates for humans. According to policy, any previously unpublished animal research reported in the ILAR Journal will have been conducted according to the scientific, technical, and humanely appropriate guidelines current at the time the research was conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals or other guidance provided by taxonomically-oriented professional societies (e.g., American Society of Mammalogy) as referenced in the Guide.
期刊最新文献
ILAR: A Retrospective and Prospective Look A Structured Approach to Optimizing Animal Model Selection for Human Translation: The Animal Model Quality Assessment. Livestock and Risk Group 4 Pathogens: Researching Zoonotic Threats to Public Health and Agriculture in Maximum Containment. Fit for Purpose Assessment: A New Direction for IACUCs. Animals as Beneficiaries of Biomedical Research Originally Intended for Humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1