Investigating and modeling the influence of PET-types on crossing conflicts at urban unsignalized intersections in India.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1080/17457300.2022.2147194
Aninda Bijoy Paul, Ninad Gore, Shriniwas Arkatkar, Gaurang Joshi
{"title":"Investigating and modeling the influence of PET-types on crossing conflicts at urban unsignalized intersections in India.","authors":"Aninda Bijoy Paul,&nbsp;Ninad Gore,&nbsp;Shriniwas Arkatkar,&nbsp;Gaurang Joshi","doi":"10.1080/17457300.2022.2147194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Un-signalized intersections in India witnessed the maximum number of crashes and fatalities in 2019. The nature of the crash investigation is still largely reactive, where the need for accurate and reliable crash data for effective safety diagnosis is pivotal. In India, crash records are unscientific, and critical details are missing. Therefore, a proactive approach using surrogate safety measures is more promising and prudent in analyzing traffic safety. The present study investigates and models crossing conflicts at un-signalized intersections under mixed traffic conditions. Traffic video data for 14 un-signalized intersections (eight un-signalized three-legged intersections and six un-signalized four-legged intersections) were collected under normal weather conditions. The crossing conflicts were identified and characterized as critical and noncritical conflicts based on the values of post-encroachment time (PET). Conflicts with PET values between -1 s and 1 s were identified as critical conflicts. The observation revealed the existence of both positive and negative PET values. The investigation revealed that crossing conflicts with negative PET values are riskier and more unsafe than conflicts with positive ones. Therefore, the crossing conflicts with positive and negative PETs were modeled separately. The positive and negative PET-based critical crossing conflicts are modeled as a function of traffic flow and intersection geometry-related characteristics using truncated negative binomial regression under a full Bayesian modeling framework. K-fold cross-validation with fivefold was employed to calibrate the model, and RMSE was used to find the best model. The modeling results revealed that the volume and traffic composition of the offending and conflicting stream and intersection geometry significantly influence the number of positive and negative PET-based critical crossing conflicts. The developed models can interest engineers and safety experts to analyze traffic safety and identify critical intersections in urban road networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":47014,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2022.2147194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Un-signalized intersections in India witnessed the maximum number of crashes and fatalities in 2019. The nature of the crash investigation is still largely reactive, where the need for accurate and reliable crash data for effective safety diagnosis is pivotal. In India, crash records are unscientific, and critical details are missing. Therefore, a proactive approach using surrogate safety measures is more promising and prudent in analyzing traffic safety. The present study investigates and models crossing conflicts at un-signalized intersections under mixed traffic conditions. Traffic video data for 14 un-signalized intersections (eight un-signalized three-legged intersections and six un-signalized four-legged intersections) were collected under normal weather conditions. The crossing conflicts were identified and characterized as critical and noncritical conflicts based on the values of post-encroachment time (PET). Conflicts with PET values between -1 s and 1 s were identified as critical conflicts. The observation revealed the existence of both positive and negative PET values. The investigation revealed that crossing conflicts with negative PET values are riskier and more unsafe than conflicts with positive ones. Therefore, the crossing conflicts with positive and negative PETs were modeled separately. The positive and negative PET-based critical crossing conflicts are modeled as a function of traffic flow and intersection geometry-related characteristics using truncated negative binomial regression under a full Bayesian modeling framework. K-fold cross-validation with fivefold was employed to calibrate the model, and RMSE was used to find the best model. The modeling results revealed that the volume and traffic composition of the offending and conflicting stream and intersection geometry significantly influence the number of positive and negative PET-based critical crossing conflicts. The developed models can interest engineers and safety experts to analyze traffic safety and identify critical intersections in urban road networks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度城市无信号交叉口pet类型对交叉冲突影响的调查与建模。
2019年,印度无信号交叉口的撞车事故和死亡人数最多。碰撞调查的本质仍然主要是反应性的,需要准确可靠的碰撞数据来进行有效的安全诊断是至关重要的。在印度,坠机记录是不科学的,而且缺少关键的细节。因此,使用替代安全措施的前瞻性方法在分析交通安全时更有希望和谨慎。本文对混合交通条件下无信号交叉口的交叉冲突进行了研究和建模。采集了14个无信号交叉口(8个无信号的三足交叉口和6个无信号的四足交叉口)在正常天气条件下的交通视频数据。基于入侵后时间(PET)值对交叉冲突进行了识别,并将交叉冲突划分为临界冲突和非临界冲突。PET值在-1秒到1秒之间的冲突被认为是严重冲突。观察发现PET阳性和阴性值同时存在。调查发现,PET值为负的交叉冲突比PET值为正的交叉冲突风险更大,更不安全。因此,对正、负pet交叉冲突分别建模。在全贝叶斯建模框架下,利用截断负二项回归将基于pet的正、负十字路口关键冲突建模为交通流和十字路口几何相关特征的函数。采用五重K-fold交叉验证对模型进行校正,并采用RMSE寻找最佳模型。建模结果表明,违规和冲突车流的数量和交通构成以及交叉口几何形状显著影响基于pet的正、负关键交叉口冲突的数量。开发的模型可以引起工程师和安全专家分析交通安全并识别城市道路网络中的关键路口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion
International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion (formerly Injury Control and Safety Promotion) publishes articles concerning all phases of injury control, including prevention, acute care and rehabilitation. Specifically, this journal will publish articles that for each type of injury: •describe the problem •analyse the causes and risk factors •discuss the design and evaluation of solutions •describe the implementation of effective programs and policies The journal encompasses all causes of fatal and non-fatal injury, including injuries related to: •transport •school and work •home and leisure activities •sport •violence and assault
期刊最新文献
Association between marine corps safety management system assessment results and injury rates and outcomes. A systematic literature review on occupational accident factors in the rail construction industry: lessons learned from a quarter-century of studies globally. An adapted taxonomy and framework for monitoring road safety strategies: a case study of Morocco. Co-location analysis of pedestrian accident attributes for Ankara. Mapping the relationship between traffic accidents, road network configuration, and urban land use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1