Long-term outcomes in lean and non-lean NAFLD patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1007/s12020-023-03351-5
Shaomin Huang, Yun Bao, Nawen Zhang, Ruilan Niu, Limin Tian
{"title":"Long-term outcomes in lean and non-lean NAFLD patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shaomin Huang, Yun Bao, Nawen Zhang, Ruilan Niu, Limin Tian","doi":"10.1007/s12020-023-03351-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) commonly occurs in overweight or obese individuals, it is increasingly being identified in the lean population. The association between lean and an increased risk of all-cause mortality among patients with NAFLD remains controversial. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate this association and compare the long-term outcomes of lean NAFLD patients and non-lean NAFLD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) from inception to October 15, 2021, for relevant original research articles without any language restrictions. Our primary outcome was to compare the all-cause mortality in lean NAFLD patients and non-lean NAFLD patients by qualitative synthesis. Relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidential intervals (CIs) were pooled with a random effect model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I-squared (I²) statistics while publication bias was determined using Egger's tests. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. As for secondary outcomes, we estimated total, cardiovascular, and liver-related mortality, as well as the incidence of diabetes, hypertension, cirrhosis, and cancer in lean and non-lean individuals with NAFLD by quantitative synthesis. Person-years of follow-up were used as the denominator to estimate the mortality and incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 12 studies (n = 26,329), 7 of which (n = 7924) were used to evaluate the risk of all-cause mortality between lean and non-lean NAFLD patients. Lean patients with NAFLD were found to be at an elevated risk of death compared to non-lean patients (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.08-1.82, heterogeneity: I² = 43%). Among the lean NAFLD population, all-cause mortality was 13.3 (95% CI: 6.7-26.1) per 1000 person-years, 3.6 (95% CI: 1.0-11.7) for liver-related mortality, and 7.7 (95% CI: 6.4-9.2) for cardiovascular-related mortality. The incidence of new-onset diabetes was 13.7 (95% CI 8·2-22.7) per 1000 person-years, new-onset hypertension was 56.1 (95% CI: 40.2-77.9), cirrhosis was 2.3 (95% CI: 1.0-5.0), and cancer was 25.7 (95% CI: 20.3-32.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lean patients with NAFLD had a higher risk of all-cause death than non-lean patients. Body mass index (BMI) should not be used as a criterion to determine whether further observation and therapy of patients with NAFLD are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49211,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-023-03351-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) commonly occurs in overweight or obese individuals, it is increasingly being identified in the lean population. The association between lean and an increased risk of all-cause mortality among patients with NAFLD remains controversial. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate this association and compare the long-term outcomes of lean NAFLD patients and non-lean NAFLD patients.

Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) from inception to October 15, 2021, for relevant original research articles without any language restrictions. Our primary outcome was to compare the all-cause mortality in lean NAFLD patients and non-lean NAFLD patients by qualitative synthesis. Relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidential intervals (CIs) were pooled with a random effect model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I-squared (I²) statistics while publication bias was determined using Egger's tests. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. As for secondary outcomes, we estimated total, cardiovascular, and liver-related mortality, as well as the incidence of diabetes, hypertension, cirrhosis, and cancer in lean and non-lean individuals with NAFLD by quantitative synthesis. Person-years of follow-up were used as the denominator to estimate the mortality and incidence.

Results: We identified 12 studies (n = 26,329), 7 of which (n = 7924) were used to evaluate the risk of all-cause mortality between lean and non-lean NAFLD patients. Lean patients with NAFLD were found to be at an elevated risk of death compared to non-lean patients (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.08-1.82, heterogeneity: I² = 43%). Among the lean NAFLD population, all-cause mortality was 13.3 (95% CI: 6.7-26.1) per 1000 person-years, 3.6 (95% CI: 1.0-11.7) for liver-related mortality, and 7.7 (95% CI: 6.4-9.2) for cardiovascular-related mortality. The incidence of new-onset diabetes was 13.7 (95% CI 8·2-22.7) per 1000 person-years, new-onset hypertension was 56.1 (95% CI: 40.2-77.9), cirrhosis was 2.3 (95% CI: 1.0-5.0), and cancer was 25.7 (95% CI: 20.3-32.4).

Conclusions: Lean patients with NAFLD had a higher risk of all-cause death than non-lean patients. Body mass index (BMI) should not be used as a criterion to determine whether further observation and therapy of patients with NAFLD are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瘦型和非瘦型非酒精性脂肪肝患者的长期疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:虽然非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)通常发生在超重或肥胖人群中,但越来越多的非酒精性脂肪肝在瘦削人群中被发现。瘦弱与非酒精性脂肪肝患者全因死亡风险增加之间的关系仍存在争议。我们的目的是对文献进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估这种关联,并比较非酒精性脂肪肝患者的长期预后和非酒精性脂肪肝患者的长期预后:为了进行此次系统综述和荟萃分析,我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、万方数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)中从开始到 2021 年 10 月 15 日的相关原始研究文章,没有任何语言限制。我们的主要研究结果是通过定性综合比较非酒精性脂肪肝患者和非酒精性脂肪肝患者的全因死亡率。采用随机效应模型对相对风险 (RR) 和相应的 95% 置信区间 (CI) 进行了汇总。使用 I 平方 (I²) 统计量评估异质性,使用 Egger 检验确定发表偏倚。我们还进行了分组分析和敏感性分析。至于次要结果,我们通过定量综合估算了非酒精性脂肪肝患者中的总死亡率、心血管死亡率、肝脏相关死亡率以及糖尿病、高血压、肝硬化和癌症的发病率。以随访人年作为分母来估算死亡率和发病率:我们确定了 12 项研究(n = 26329),其中 7 项(n = 7924)用于评估非酒精性脂肪肝患者中瘦型和非瘦型患者的全因死亡风险。研究发现,与非清瘦患者相比,非酒精性脂肪肝清瘦患者的死亡风险更高(RR = 1.39,95% CI 1.08-1.82,异质性:I² = 43%)。在非酒精性脂肪肝患者中,全因死亡率为每千人年13.3(95% CI:6.7-26.1),肝脏相关死亡率为每千人年3.6(95% CI:1.0-11.7),心血管相关死亡率为每千人年7.7(95% CI:6.4-9.2)。新发糖尿病的发病率为每1000人年13.7例(95% CI:8-2-22.7例),新发高血压为56.1例(95% CI:40.2-77.9例),肝硬化为2.3例(95% CI:1.0-5.0例),癌症为25.7例(95% CI:20.3-32.4例):结论:患有非酒精性脂肪肝的瘦弱患者比非瘦弱患者有更高的全因死亡风险。体重指数(BMI)不应作为是否需要对非酒精性脂肪肝患者进行进一步观察和治疗的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine
Endocrine ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology. Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted. Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.
期刊最新文献
Identification and in vivo functional analysis of a novel missense mutation in GATA3 causing hypoparathyroidism, sensorineural deafness and renal dysplasia syndrome in a Chinese family. Evaluation of the impact Of ChatGPT support on acromegaly management and patient education. Correction to: Androgen-induced upregulation of CFTR in pancreatic β-cell contributes to hyperinsulinemia in PCOS model. Analysis of T follicular and T peripheral helper lymphocytes in autoimmune thyroid disease. Clinical and functional characterization of a novel KCNJ11 (c.101G > A, p.R34H) mutation associated with maturity-onset diabetes mellitus of the young type 13.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1