Reducing Surgical Site Infection by Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in a Cohort of General Surgery Patients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Visceral Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1159/000520464
Vladimir Piroski, Elisa Müller, Eva Herrmann, Ernst Hanisch, Alexander Buia
{"title":"Reducing Surgical Site Infection by Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in a Cohort of General Surgery Patients.","authors":"Vladimir Piroski,&nbsp;Elisa Müller,&nbsp;Eva Herrmann,&nbsp;Ernst Hanisch,&nbsp;Alexander Buia","doi":"10.1159/000520464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the leading complications in health care. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is meanwhile widely prophylactically used for preventing SSIs. For evaluating the results of the implantation of this technique, we used the Simon single-arm study design and examine whether NPWT has a prophylactic effect on reducing SSIs in a cohort of general surgery patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-arm, two-stage study includes 81 elective general surgery patients and corresponds to the Simon's design. The sample size calculation was based on a reduction in the superficial SSI rate from 12 to 4% (power 80%, significance level 5%) using a NPWT system. In compliance with Simon's two-Stage design, the study required the recruitment of 34 patients in stage I and 47 patients in stage II. The two-stage design method would be discarded in case of a wound infection in 3 or more patients in stage I or 6 or more patients in stage II. Using the NPWT system in the operating room, a negative pressure wound dressing was applied post-operatively and removed after 7 days. According to the criteria of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), post-operative wound documentation followed on day 7 and 30.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In stage I, no SSI was apparent. In stage II, 3 patients had SSIs (CDC grade I).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A prophylactic NPWT can significantly reduce the wound infection rate in elective general surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 4","pages":"272-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421711/pdf/vis-0038-0272.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visceral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000520464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the leading complications in health care. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is meanwhile widely prophylactically used for preventing SSIs. For evaluating the results of the implantation of this technique, we used the Simon single-arm study design and examine whether NPWT has a prophylactic effect on reducing SSIs in a cohort of general surgery patients.

Methods: This single-arm, two-stage study includes 81 elective general surgery patients and corresponds to the Simon's design. The sample size calculation was based on a reduction in the superficial SSI rate from 12 to 4% (power 80%, significance level 5%) using a NPWT system. In compliance with Simon's two-Stage design, the study required the recruitment of 34 patients in stage I and 47 patients in stage II. The two-stage design method would be discarded in case of a wound infection in 3 or more patients in stage I or 6 or more patients in stage II. Using the NPWT system in the operating room, a negative pressure wound dressing was applied post-operatively and removed after 7 days. According to the criteria of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), post-operative wound documentation followed on day 7 and 30.

Results: In stage I, no SSI was apparent. In stage II, 3 patients had SSIs (CDC grade I).

Conclusion: A prophylactic NPWT can significantly reduce the wound infection rate in elective general surgery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普外科患者预防性负压伤口治疗减少手术部位感染的研究。
背景:手术部位感染(SSI)是医疗保健中的主要并发症之一。负压创面治疗(NPWT)同时也被广泛用于预防伤口外伤。为了评估该技术的植入效果,我们采用Simon单臂研究设计,并在一组普外科患者中检查NPWT是否对减少ssi具有预防作用。方法:这项单臂、两期研究包括81例选择性普外科患者,符合Simon’s设计。样本量的计算是基于使用NPWT系统将浅表SSI率从12%降低到4%(功率80%,显著性水平5%)。按照Simon的两阶段设计,该研究需要招募34名I期患者和47名II期患者。如果I期有3例及以上患者出现伤口感染,II期有6例及以上患者出现伤口感染,则放弃两阶段设计方法。在手术室使用NPWT系统,术后应用负压创面敷料,7天后取出。根据疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的标准,术后伤口记录于第7天和第30天进行。结果:I期无明显SSI。结论:预防性NPWT可显著降低择期普外科创面感染率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Visceral Medicine
Visceral Medicine Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal is unique in its field as it covers the principles of both gastrointestinal medicine and surgery required for treating abdominal diseases. In each issue invited reviews provide a comprehensive overview of one selected topic. Thus, a sound background of the state of the art in clinical practice and research is provided. A panel of specialists in gastroenterology, surgery, radiology, and pathology discusses different approaches to diagnosis and treatment of the topic covered in the respective issue. Original articles, case reports, and commentaries make for further interesting reading.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Early Removal of Urinary Catheter in Patients Undergoing Abdominal and Thoracic Surgeries with Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia on Postoperative Urinary Retention. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Still a Complex and Complicated Disease with Many Uncertainties and Challenges. The Role of Magnesium in Acute Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Injury: A Systematic Review. Endoscopic Resection of Neoplasia in the Lower GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm. Endoscopy First: The Best Choice to Optimize Outcomes for Early Gastrointestinal Malignancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1