Visceral Medicine最新文献

Introduction: As natural calcium (Ca) antagonist, magnesium (Mg) seems to counteract Ca-signaling pathways involved in the intracellular protease activation leading to acute pancreatitis. We systematically reviewed the current literature to investigate the role of Mg in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis and its possible use in detecting, predicting, and preventing acute pancreatitis.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed/Scopus/Web of Science to identify in vivo and in vitro studies reporting data on Mg in acute pancreatitis.

Results: Twelve studies were included. Due to their heterogeneity, we conducted a review without the intent of inference. Mg deficiency in pancreatic acinar cells seems to be frequently associated with serum hypocalcemia and acute pancreatitis. Mg seems to contrast intracellular Ca accumulation which induces premature enzyme activation and acute pancreatitis. Several in vivo and in vitro experiments showed beneficial effects of Mg supplementation in counteracting Ca-signaling pathways and subsequent pathological events. Moreover, a recent randomized trial demonstrated the efficacy of Mg supplementation in reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis in high-risk patients.

Conclusion: Mg is a natural antagonist of Ca-signaling pathways and, when deficient, predisposes to acute pancreatitis. Mg supplementation may be useful to prevent acute pancreatitis in many contexts, such as post-ERCP or after pancreatic surgery. The heterogeneity of the included studies represents an important limitation that may hinder robust conclusions.

Background: Postoperative continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an integral aspect of pain management after major abdominal and thoracic surgery. Under TEA, postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is frequently noted, prompting a common practice of maintaining the transurethral catheter (UC) until the cessation of TEA to avoid the necessity for reinsertion of the UC. This study analyzes the effect of an early bladder catheter removal during TEA on POUR incidence.

Methods: The retrospective study was conducted on 71 patients undergoing elective abdominal and thoracic operations with TEA for postoperative pain control. Patients were divided into two groups based on the UC removal time in relation to the epidural catheter removal. In the early removal group (ERG), the UC was removed within 3 days of surgery, while in the standard group (SG), it was removed after completion of TEA. All patients in the ERG were still receiving TEA at the time of the UC removal. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of POUR, while secondary outcomes included urinary tract infections (UTI), hospital length of stay (LOS), and patient's comfort.

Results: The overall prevalence of POUR was 7%, with five POUR cases - two (4.9%) of 41 patients in SG and three (10%) of 30 in ERG (p = 0.644). No significant difference was found in POUR occurrence between ERG and SG (p = 0.644). Additionally, no UTIs were observed in the study. The postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]) 72 h and 96 h and the LOS (SG: 16.74 [±8.39] days; ERG: 14.53 [±6.99] days; p = 0.3) were similar between both study groups.

Conclusion: Based on our results, it can be concluded that the removal of UC in the early postoperative period, even during TEA, can be performed safely without significantly increasing the risk of recatheterization.

Background: Colorectal cancer is a highly prevalent malignancy and a significant driver of cancer mortality and health-related expenditure worldwide. Polyp removal reduces the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. In 2024, endoscopists have an array of resection modalities at their disposal. Each technique requires a unique skillset and has individual advantages and limitations. Consequently, resection in the colorectum requires an evidence-based algorithm approach that considers these factors.

Summary: A literature review of endoscopic resection for colonic neoplasia was conducted. Best supporting scientific evidence was summarized for the endoscopic resection of diminutive polyps, large ≥20 mm lesions and polyps containing invasive cancer. Factors including resection modality, complications and lesion selection were explored to inform an algorithm approach to colorectal resection.

Key messages: Endoscopic resection in the colorectum is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Detailed understanding of polyp size, location, morphology and predicted histology are critical factors that inform appropriate endoscopic resection practice.