Inhibition, Attentional Control and Binding Abilities in Relation to Dissociative Symptoms Among PTSD Patients.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Trauma & Dissociation Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-29 DOI:10.1080/15299732.2023.2195397
A Vancappel, C Raysseguier, C Révellière, T Penverne, R Fernandes, W El-Hage
{"title":"Inhibition, Attentional Control and Binding Abilities in Relation to Dissociative Symptoms Among PTSD Patients.","authors":"A Vancappel,&nbsp;C Raysseguier,&nbsp;C Révellière,&nbsp;T Penverne,&nbsp;R Fernandes,&nbsp;W El-Hage","doi":"10.1080/15299732.2023.2195397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The relationship between dissociation and cognitive abilities remains controversial. Empirical studies have reported positive, negative and non-existent associations between dissociation and cognition. These inconsistent results may be due to the fact that the studies focused mainly on trait dissociation, while dissociation is not stable but transient. After validating the French version of the Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS), the aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between state dissociation and cognitive abilities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We recruited 83 patients suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and assessed them twice. At T1, they performed a neutral Stroop task and a neutral binding task. At T2 (one to three weeks later), after a script-driven dissociative induction, they performed an emotional Stroop task and an emotional binding task. Between the two sessions, they completed questionnaires at home evaluating PTSD severity, trait dissociation and cognitive difficulties. State dissociation was assessed at T1 and T2 using the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found good psychometric properties of the French version of the CADSS. After inducing dissociation, significantly lower attentional performance was found among patients with than without dissociative reactions. We found a significant positive correlation between state dissociation and increased attention and memory difficulties after induction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The French version of the CADSS is a reliable and valid tool to assess state dissociation, which is correlated with attentional difficulties. Attentional training is recommended to help patients control dissociative symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2023.2195397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The relationship between dissociation and cognitive abilities remains controversial. Empirical studies have reported positive, negative and non-existent associations between dissociation and cognition. These inconsistent results may be due to the fact that the studies focused mainly on trait dissociation, while dissociation is not stable but transient. After validating the French version of the Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS), the aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between state dissociation and cognitive abilities.

Method: We recruited 83 patients suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and assessed them twice. At T1, they performed a neutral Stroop task and a neutral binding task. At T2 (one to three weeks later), after a script-driven dissociative induction, they performed an emotional Stroop task and an emotional binding task. Between the two sessions, they completed questionnaires at home evaluating PTSD severity, trait dissociation and cognitive difficulties. State dissociation was assessed at T1 and T2 using the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS).

Results: We found good psychometric properties of the French version of the CADSS. After inducing dissociation, significantly lower attentional performance was found among patients with than without dissociative reactions. We found a significant positive correlation between state dissociation and increased attention and memory difficulties after induction.

Conclusion: The French version of the CADSS is a reliable and valid tool to assess state dissociation, which is correlated with attentional difficulties. Attentional training is recommended to help patients control dissociative symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PTSD患者的抑制、注意控制和结合能力与分离症状的关系。
引言:分离和认知能力之间的关系仍然存在争议。实证研究报告了分离和认知之间的积极、消极和不存在的联系。这些不一致的结果可能是由于研究主要集中在特征解离上,而解离不是稳定的,而是短暂的。在验证了临床医生管理的解离状态量表(CADSS)的法语版本后,本研究的目的是评估状态解离与认知能力之间的关系。方法:我们招募了83名患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患者,并对他们进行了两次评估。在T1,他们执行中性Stroop任务和中性绑定任务。在T2(一到三周后),在脚本驱动的解离诱导后,他们执行了情感Stroop任务和情感绑定任务。在两次会议之间,他们在家里完成了评估创伤后应激障碍严重程度、特质分离和认知困难的问卷调查。使用临床医生管理的解离状态量表(CADSS)在T1和T2评估状态解离。结果:我们发现法语版的CADSS具有良好的心理测量特性。在诱导解离后,发现有解离反应的患者的注意力表现明显低于没有解离反应的病人。我们发现诱导后状态分离与注意力和记忆困难增加之间存在显著的正相关。结论:法语版CADSS是评估状态分离的可靠有效工具,状态分离与注意困难有关。建议进行注意训练以帮助患者控制解离症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Correction. Presidential Editorial. The Detection of Invalid Responses Using the Dissociative Experiences Scale-V (DES-V). Dissociative Experiences Among Transgender Women: A Phenomenological Study. A Virtual Reality Simulation to Examine the Relationship Between Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms and Decision-Making in First Responders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1