Food Insecurity Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Type 2 Diabetes: Implications for Diabetes Care and Education Specialists.

McKayla Massey, YunYing Zhong, Jacqueline B LaManna, Boon Peng Ng
{"title":"Food Insecurity Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Type 2 Diabetes: Implications for Diabetes Care and Education Specialists.","authors":"McKayla Massey,&nbsp;YunYing Zhong,&nbsp;Jacqueline B LaManna,&nbsp;Boon Peng Ng","doi":"10.1177/26350106231173674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to examine factors associated with food insecurity among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Public Use File of beneficiaries ≥65 years old with type 2 diabetes (n = 1343) was analyzed. A binary variable was created to represent food insecurity (1 = food insecurity, 0 = without food insecurity) with ≥2 affirmative responses adapting an established algorithm of the United States Department of Agriculture food insecurity questionnaire. A survey-weighted logistic model was performed to examine factors (ie, sociodemographic characteristics, health status, and insurance coverage) associated with food insecurity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 11.6% of study Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes reported food insecurity. Non-Hispanic Black beneficiaries were more likely to report food insecurity than non-Hispanic White beneficiaries. Beneficiaries with incomes < $25 000 were more likely to report food insecurity than those with higher incomes. Beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage programs (vs traditional Medicare), having Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility (vs nondual), and living with instrumental activities of daily living or activities of daily living limitations (vs without) were also more likely to report food insecurity than their respective counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sociodemographic disparities in food insecurity were observed among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes. Implementation of screening protocols, interventions related to social determinants of health, and the diabetes care continuum may mitigate the prevalence of food insecurity in this demographic.</p>","PeriodicalId":75187,"journal":{"name":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","volume":"49 4","pages":"291-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106231173674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine factors associated with food insecurity among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: The 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Public Use File of beneficiaries ≥65 years old with type 2 diabetes (n = 1343) was analyzed. A binary variable was created to represent food insecurity (1 = food insecurity, 0 = without food insecurity) with ≥2 affirmative responses adapting an established algorithm of the United States Department of Agriculture food insecurity questionnaire. A survey-weighted logistic model was performed to examine factors (ie, sociodemographic characteristics, health status, and insurance coverage) associated with food insecurity.

Results: Approximately 11.6% of study Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes reported food insecurity. Non-Hispanic Black beneficiaries were more likely to report food insecurity than non-Hispanic White beneficiaries. Beneficiaries with incomes < $25 000 were more likely to report food insecurity than those with higher incomes. Beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage programs (vs traditional Medicare), having Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility (vs nondual), and living with instrumental activities of daily living or activities of daily living limitations (vs without) were also more likely to report food insecurity than their respective counterparts.

Conclusions: Sociodemographic disparities in food insecurity were observed among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes. Implementation of screening protocols, interventions related to social determinants of health, and the diabetes care continuum may mitigate the prevalence of food insecurity in this demographic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病医疗保险受益人的食品不安全:对糖尿病护理和教育专家的影响。
目的:本研究的目的是研究与医疗保险受益人中患有2型糖尿病的食品不安全相关的因素。方法:分析2019年医疗保险现行受益人调查公共使用档案中年龄≥65岁的2型糖尿病受益人(n = 1343)。采用美国农业部粮食不安全问卷的既定算法,创建一个二元变量来表示粮食不安全(1 =粮食不安全,0 =无粮食不安全),且肯定答案≥2。采用调查加权逻辑模型来检查与粮食不安全相关的因素(即社会人口特征、健康状况和保险覆盖范围)。结果:大约11.6%的2型糖尿病医疗保险受益人报告了食品不安全。非西班牙裔黑人受益人比非西班牙裔白人受益人更有可能报告粮食不安全。结论:在患有2型糖尿病的医疗保险受益人中观察到食品不安全的社会人口差异。筛查方案的实施、与健康的社会决定因素相关的干预措施以及糖尿病护理的连续性可能会减轻这一人群中粮食不安全的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs in the Dominican Republic (DR-DAWN2). A Minimally Time-Consuming Method for Regular, Ongoing Outcome Assessments in a Rural Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Program: Validation via Retrospective Pre-Post Studies. Assessing Current Knowledge of Hearing Impairment With Diabetes by Surveying Providers With CBDCE Certification. Food Insecurity and Depressive Symptoms Among Persons With Diabetes in the United States: Findings From the 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Medication-Taking Trajectory and Its Correlates in Patients With Diabetes: Based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1