Factors that influence decision-making among youth who vape and youth who don’t vape

Q1 Psychology Addictive Behaviors Reports Pub Date : 2023-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100509
Laura Struik , Kyla Christianson , Shaheer Khan , Youjin Yang , Saige-Taylor Werstuik , Sarah Dow-Fleisner , Shelly Ben-David
{"title":"Factors that influence decision-making among youth who vape and youth who don’t vape","authors":"Laura Struik ,&nbsp;Kyla Christianson ,&nbsp;Shaheer Khan ,&nbsp;Youjin Yang ,&nbsp;Saige-Taylor Werstuik ,&nbsp;Sarah Dow-Fleisner ,&nbsp;Shelly Ben-David","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vaping rates among Canadian youth are significantly higher compared to adults. While it is acknowledged that various personal and socio-environmental factors influence the risk of school-aged youth for vaping uptake, we don’t know which known behavior change factors are most influential, for whom, and how. The Unified Theory of Behavior (UTB) brings together theoretically-based behavior change factors that influence health risk decision making. We aimed to use this framework to study the factors that influence decision making around vaping among school-aged youth. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 25 youth aged 12 to 18 who were either vaped or didn't vape. We employed a collaborative and directed content analysis approach and the UTB constructs served as the coding framework for analysis. Gender differences were explored in the analysis. We found that multiple intersecting factors play a significant role in youth decision making to vape. Youth who vaped and those who did not vape reported similar mediating determinants that either reinforced or challenged their decision-making, such as easy access to vaping, constant exposure to vaping, and the temptation of flavors. Youth who didn't vape reported individual determinants that strengthened their intentions to not vape, including more negative behavioral beliefs (e.g., vaping is harmful) and normative beliefs (e.g., family disapproves), and strong self-efficacy (e.g. self-confidence). Youth who did vape, however, reported individual determinants that supported their intentions to vape, such as social identity, coolness, and peer endorsement. The findings revealed cohesion across multiple determinants, suggesting that consideration of multiple determinents when developing prevention messages would be beneficial for reaching youth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/be/b8/main.PMC10382621.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Vaping rates among Canadian youth are significantly higher compared to adults. While it is acknowledged that various personal and socio-environmental factors influence the risk of school-aged youth for vaping uptake, we don’t know which known behavior change factors are most influential, for whom, and how. The Unified Theory of Behavior (UTB) brings together theoretically-based behavior change factors that influence health risk decision making. We aimed to use this framework to study the factors that influence decision making around vaping among school-aged youth. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 25 youth aged 12 to 18 who were either vaped or didn't vape. We employed a collaborative and directed content analysis approach and the UTB constructs served as the coding framework for analysis. Gender differences were explored in the analysis. We found that multiple intersecting factors play a significant role in youth decision making to vape. Youth who vaped and those who did not vape reported similar mediating determinants that either reinforced or challenged their decision-making, such as easy access to vaping, constant exposure to vaping, and the temptation of flavors. Youth who didn't vape reported individual determinants that strengthened their intentions to not vape, including more negative behavioral beliefs (e.g., vaping is harmful) and normative beliefs (e.g., family disapproves), and strong self-efficacy (e.g. self-confidence). Youth who did vape, however, reported individual determinants that supported their intentions to vape, such as social identity, coolness, and peer endorsement. The findings revealed cohesion across multiple determinants, suggesting that consideration of multiple determinents when developing prevention messages would be beneficial for reaching youth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响吸电子烟青少年和不吸电子烟青少年决策的因素
加拿大青年的吸烟率明显高于成年人。虽然人们承认,各种个人和社会环境因素会影响学龄青年吸食电子烟的风险,但我们不知道哪些已知的行为改变因素最有影响,对谁以及如何影响。统一行为理论(UTB)汇集了影响健康风险决策的基于理论的行为变化因素。我们旨在利用这个框架来研究影响学龄青年电子烟决策的因素。对25名年龄在12至18岁的青少年进行了定性访谈,他们要么吸了电子烟,要么没有吸。我们采用了协作和定向的内容分析方法,UTB结构作为分析的编码框架。分析中探讨了性别差异。我们发现,多种交叉因素在青少年电子烟的决策中起着重要作用。吸过电子烟的年轻人和不吸电子烟的人报告了类似的中介决定因素,这些决定因素要么强化了他们的决策,要么挑战了他们的决定,比如容易接触电子烟、经常接触电子烟以及口味的诱惑。没有吸电子烟的年轻人报告了强化他们不吸电子烟意图的个人决定因素,包括更消极的行为信念(例如,吸电子烟是有害的)和规范信念(例如家庭不赞成),以及强烈的自我效能感(如自信心)。然而,吸电子烟的年轻人报告了支持他们吸电子烟意图的个人决定因素,如社会认同、冷静和同伴认可。研究结果揭示了多种决定因素之间的凝聚力,表明在制定预防信息时考虑多种决定因素将有利于惠及青年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
期刊最新文献
Genomic factors associated with substance use disorder relapse: A critical review Mokken scale analysis of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale–Short-Form and the Gaming Disorder Test The influence of sociodemographic, tobacco use, and mental health characteristics on treatment adherence among adults enrolled in a community-based tobacco cessation program Examining problem gambling, substance use disorders and cluster B personality traits among incarcerated individuals Cigarette smoking status and COVID-19 hospitalization in the context of cannabis use: An electronic health record cohort study in northern California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1