Using a Decision Tree Approach to Analyze Key Factors Influencing Intraoperative-Acquired Pressure Injury.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-25 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000003
Guirong Shi, Liping Jiang, Ping Liu, Xin Xu, Qunfang Wu, Peipei Zhang
{"title":"Using a Decision Tree Approach to Analyze Key Factors Influencing Intraoperative-Acquired Pressure Injury.","authors":"Guirong Shi, Liping Jiang, Ping Liu, Xin Xu, Qunfang Wu, Peipei Zhang","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the key factors influencing intraoperative-acquired pressure injury (IAPI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Researchers assessed 413 surgical patients in a Shanghai tertiary hospital using an information collection form and an IAPI occurrence record form. Analysis took place using the classification and regression tree algorithm and multiple logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 surgical patients (10.4%) had IAPI, including 32 stage 1 cases (74.4%), and 11 stage 2 cases (25.6%). The multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that operation duration, surgical position, preoperative hypertension, and preoperative Braden Scale risk score were independently associated with IAPI development. The decision tree showed that preoperative Braden Scale score, surgical position, operation grade, operation duration, age, prealbumin level, and body mass index were important factors and that preoperative Braden Scale score was the most critical decision variable. The cross-validation method was used to indicate a model accuracy of 91.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The decision tree effectively identified key factors for IAPI, complementing the logistic regression analysis and providing a scientific basis for the further development of structural risk assessment, prevention, and treatment strategies for IAPI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"591-597"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the key factors influencing intraoperative-acquired pressure injury (IAPI).

Methods: Researchers assessed 413 surgical patients in a Shanghai tertiary hospital using an information collection form and an IAPI occurrence record form. Analysis took place using the classification and regression tree algorithm and multiple logistic regression.

Results: A total of 43 surgical patients (10.4%) had IAPI, including 32 stage 1 cases (74.4%), and 11 stage 2 cases (25.6%). The multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that operation duration, surgical position, preoperative hypertension, and preoperative Braden Scale risk score were independently associated with IAPI development. The decision tree showed that preoperative Braden Scale score, surgical position, operation grade, operation duration, age, prealbumin level, and body mass index were important factors and that preoperative Braden Scale score was the most critical decision variable. The cross-validation method was used to indicate a model accuracy of 91.8%.

Conclusions: The decision tree effectively identified key factors for IAPI, complementing the logistic regression analysis and providing a scientific basis for the further development of structural risk assessment, prevention, and treatment strategies for IAPI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用决策树方法分析影响术中获得性压力损伤的关键因素。
目的:确定影响术中获得性压力损伤(IAPI)的关键因素。方法:研究人员采用信息收集表和IAPI发生记录表对上海某三级医院413例手术患者进行了评估。采用分类回归树算法和多元逻辑回归进行分析。结果:共有43例手术患者(10.4%)患有IAPI,其中1期32例(74.4%),2期11例(25.6%)。多元逻辑回归分析表明,手术时间、手术体位、术前高血压和术前Braden量表风险评分与IAPI的发展独立相关。决策树显示,术前Braden量表评分、手术部位、手术级别、手术持续时间、年龄、前白蛋白水平和体重指数是重要因素,术前Braden量表评分是最关键的决策变量。结论:决策树有效地确定了IAPI的关键因素,补充了逻辑回归分析,为进一步制定IAPI的结构风险评估、预防和治疗策略提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Indices of Topical Antiseptics in Wound Care: A Systematic Review. Omega Fatty Acid-Based Therapy for Healing of Recalcitrant Wounds in Patients with Complex Comorbidities. A Catheter Securement Strategy for Patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa. Examining the Effect of Oral Health on Nutrition Status and Wound Healing. Healing with Systematic Wound Management after Minimally Invasive Treatment of Axillary Osmidrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1