Evaluation of the relationship between food addiction and depression, anxiety, and stress in university students: A cross-sectional survey

Kübra Kayaoğlu PhD, RN, Kerim Kaan Göküstün, Eda Ay PhD, RN
{"title":"Evaluation of the relationship between food addiction and depression, anxiety, and stress in university students: A cross-sectional survey","authors":"Kübra Kayaoğlu PhD, RN,&nbsp;Kerim Kaan Göküstün,&nbsp;Eda Ay PhD, RN","doi":"10.1111/jcap.12428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted to determine the relationship between food addiction (FA) and depression, anxiety, and stress (DAS) in university students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The research was conducted with 362 university students who met the study criteria and volunteered to participate in the study. The study data were collected using a personal information form, the modified Yale food addiction scale 2.0 (mYFAS 2.0), and the depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS-21).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>It was determined that 40% of the students participating in the study had FA. The mean score of students with FA on the DASS-21 scale was determined as 25.90 ± 14.56 and the scores they received from the anxiety, depression, and stress subdimension as (8.14 ± 5.57, 9.04 ± 5.46, 8.72 ± 5.60, respectively). The scores of students without FA from the anxiety, depression, and stress subdimension, where the mean score of the DASS-21 scale is 14.79 ± 12.72, were determined as (4.67 ± 4.48, 4.98 ± 4.96, 5.13 ± 5.05, respectively). It was found that the mean scores of participants with FA were higher than those without FA, and the difference between the groups was determined statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practice Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The rates of DAS of students with FA were found to be higher compared to those without FA. In the treatment of FA in clinical services, nurses and other health professionals should identify and treat psychiatric comorbidities associated with FA, such as depression and anxiety.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing","volume":"36 3","pages":"256-262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcap.12428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study was conducted to determine the relationship between food addiction (FA) and depression, anxiety, and stress (DAS) in university students.

Design and Methods

The research was conducted with 362 university students who met the study criteria and volunteered to participate in the study. The study data were collected using a personal information form, the modified Yale food addiction scale 2.0 (mYFAS 2.0), and the depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS-21).

Findings

It was determined that 40% of the students participating in the study had FA. The mean score of students with FA on the DASS-21 scale was determined as 25.90 ± 14.56 and the scores they received from the anxiety, depression, and stress subdimension as (8.14 ± 5.57, 9.04 ± 5.46, 8.72 ± 5.60, respectively). The scores of students without FA from the anxiety, depression, and stress subdimension, where the mean score of the DASS-21 scale is 14.79 ± 12.72, were determined as (4.67 ± 4.48, 4.98 ± 4.96, 5.13 ± 5.05, respectively). It was found that the mean scores of participants with FA were higher than those without FA, and the difference between the groups was determined statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Practice Implications

The rates of DAS of students with FA were found to be higher compared to those without FA. In the treatment of FA in clinical services, nurses and other health professionals should identify and treat psychiatric comorbidities associated with FA, such as depression and anxiety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生食物成瘾与抑郁、焦虑和压力关系的评估:一项横断面调查
目的探讨大学生食物成瘾(FA)与抑郁、焦虑和压力(DAS)的关系。设计与方法本研究以362名符合研究标准并自愿参加研究的大学生为研究对象。研究数据采用个人信息表、改良耶鲁食物成瘾量表2.0 (mYFAS 2.0)和抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)收集。研究结果确定参与研究的学生中有40%患有FA。FA学生的DASS-21量表平均得分为25.90±14.56分,焦虑、抑郁、应激维度得分分别为(8.14±5.57分、9.04±5.46分、8.72±5.60分)。无FA学生的焦虑、抑郁、压力子维度得分分别为(4.67±4.48,4.98±4.96,5.13±5.05),其中das -21量表平均得分为14.79±12.72。发现FA患者的平均得分高于未FA患者,组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。研究发现,与非FA学生相比,FA学生的DAS发生率更高。在治疗FA的临床服务中,护士和其他卫生专业人员应该识别和治疗与FA相关的精神合并症,如抑郁和焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing (JCAPN) is the only nursing journal to focus exclusively on issues of child and adolescent mental health around the world. As a primary resource for nurses and other healthcare professionals in clinical practice, educator roles, and those conducting research in mental health and psychiatric care, the journal includes peer-reviewed, original articles from a wide range of contributors in a broad variety of settings.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Wildfires on the Mental and Physical Health of School-Age Children in North America: A Scoping Review The Relationship Between Social Media Addiction and Perceived Stress in Adolescents Youth mental health crisis: What's next? Mental health conditions of Colombian adolescent population: An approach to risk Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1