Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration, the Bethesda System, and the BRAFV600E Mutation in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Association and Prediction for Biopsy.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Acta Cytologica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000528860
María Eugenia Galan-Garcia, Maria Soledad Martínez-Martin, Eduardo José Araujo-Ruano, Juan Francisco Loro-Ferrer, Pedro Saavedra-Santana, Eduardo Salido-Ruiz, Juan Jose Cabrera-Galván
{"title":"Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration, the Bethesda System, and the BRAFV600E Mutation in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Association and Prediction for Biopsy.","authors":"María Eugenia Galan-Garcia,&nbsp;Maria Soledad Martínez-Martin,&nbsp;Eduardo José Araujo-Ruano,&nbsp;Juan Francisco Loro-Ferrer,&nbsp;Pedro Saavedra-Santana,&nbsp;Eduardo Salido-Ruiz,&nbsp;Juan Jose Cabrera-Galván","doi":"10.1159/000528860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>BRAFV600E mutations have been associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) histological types including tall-cell and classical, peritumoral infiltration, and nuclear signs, whereas cytological features such as plump cells and sickle nuclei have also been associated with favorable thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) results for this tumor. BRAF and RAS are considered early driver mutations that contribute to the development of BRAF-like PTCs and RAS-like PTCs. Our aim was to assess the possible association between all Bethesda System cytological features and thyroid FNAs for PTC and their potential predictive value for future BRAFV600E-related biopsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study analyzed 63 cases of PTCs operated on at our hospital over a 5-year period between 2005 and 2017 that had previously undergone FNA and had been classified by the Bethesda System. BRAFV600E was identified by pyrosequencing paraffin-embedded tissues and comparing the cytological signs with the Bethesda System. In addition, a statistical and predictive study of the diagnostic factors \"non-follicular,\" \"non-round nuclei,\" and \"non-clear chromatin\" was performed to discriminate BRAF-like signs from other hypothetical RAS-like follicular signs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BRAFV600E was detected in 43/63 cases (68.2%). Histological types were significant (p < 0.001), with the classical variant being the most prevalent 31/63 (49.2%) and independent by multivariate analysis odds ratio of 10.58 [2.67; 41.97]. Follicular cytological signs are negatively associated with BRAFV600E: follicular structure (p < 0.001), round nuclei (p = 0.015), and clear chromatin (p = 0.049), while the diagnostic factors: \"non-follicular\" (positive predictive value [PPV] 82.9, sensitivity 79.1, negative predictive value [NPV] 59.1, specificity 65.0), \"non-round nuclei\" (PPV 76.6, sensitivity 83.7, NPV 56.3, specificity 45.0), and \"non-clear chromatin\" (PPV 75.6, sensitivity 79.1, NPV 50.0, specificity 45.0) have predictive value for the mutation. There was no individual significance for the remaining cytological features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found no association between cytomorphological signs of thyroid FNA and BRAFV600E mutation. Considering the Bethesda System, there is an association (p = 0.045) with numerous cases of mutated PTC in categories V and VI. Our results indicate, however, that the presence of signs referred to as \"non-follicular,\" \"non-round nuclei,\" and \"non-clear chromatin\" in biopsy of papillary thyroid carcinoma is predictive of BRAF type mutation, whereas follicular signs indicate a RAS type PTC, according to published literature. These results need to be confirmed or modified by further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":"67 4","pages":"346-356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cytologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528860","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: BRAFV600E mutations have been associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) histological types including tall-cell and classical, peritumoral infiltration, and nuclear signs, whereas cytological features such as plump cells and sickle nuclei have also been associated with favorable thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) results for this tumor. BRAF and RAS are considered early driver mutations that contribute to the development of BRAF-like PTCs and RAS-like PTCs. Our aim was to assess the possible association between all Bethesda System cytological features and thyroid FNAs for PTC and their potential predictive value for future BRAFV600E-related biopsies.

Methods: Our study analyzed 63 cases of PTCs operated on at our hospital over a 5-year period between 2005 and 2017 that had previously undergone FNA and had been classified by the Bethesda System. BRAFV600E was identified by pyrosequencing paraffin-embedded tissues and comparing the cytological signs with the Bethesda System. In addition, a statistical and predictive study of the diagnostic factors "non-follicular," "non-round nuclei," and "non-clear chromatin" was performed to discriminate BRAF-like signs from other hypothetical RAS-like follicular signs.

Results: BRAFV600E was detected in 43/63 cases (68.2%). Histological types were significant (p < 0.001), with the classical variant being the most prevalent 31/63 (49.2%) and independent by multivariate analysis odds ratio of 10.58 [2.67; 41.97]. Follicular cytological signs are negatively associated with BRAFV600E: follicular structure (p < 0.001), round nuclei (p = 0.015), and clear chromatin (p = 0.049), while the diagnostic factors: "non-follicular" (positive predictive value [PPV] 82.9, sensitivity 79.1, negative predictive value [NPV] 59.1, specificity 65.0), "non-round nuclei" (PPV 76.6, sensitivity 83.7, NPV 56.3, specificity 45.0), and "non-clear chromatin" (PPV 75.6, sensitivity 79.1, NPV 50.0, specificity 45.0) have predictive value for the mutation. There was no individual significance for the remaining cytological features.

Conclusions: Our study found no association between cytomorphological signs of thyroid FNA and BRAFV600E mutation. Considering the Bethesda System, there is an association (p = 0.045) with numerous cases of mutated PTC in categories V and VI. Our results indicate, however, that the presence of signs referred to as "non-follicular," "non-round nuclei," and "non-clear chromatin" in biopsy of papillary thyroid carcinoma is predictive of BRAF type mutation, whereas follicular signs indicate a RAS type PTC, according to published literature. These results need to be confirmed or modified by further research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺细针穿刺、Bethesda系统和甲状腺乳头状癌BRAFV600E突变:与活检的关联和预测。
BRAFV600E突变与甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的组织学类型相关,包括高细胞和典型、瘤周浸润和核征,而细胞学特征如丰满细胞和镰状核也与甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)对该肿瘤的有利结果相关。BRAF和RAS被认为是促进BRAF样ptc和RAS样ptc发展的早期驱动突变。我们的目的是评估所有Bethesda系统细胞学特征与PTC甲状腺FNAs之间的可能关联,以及它们对未来brafv600e相关活检的潜在预测价值。方法:对我院2005年至2017年5年间63例术前行FNA并经Bethesda系统分类的ptc患者进行分析。BRAFV600E通过石蜡包埋组织进行焦磷酸测序,并与Bethesda系统比较细胞学特征。此外,对诊断因素“非卵泡”、“非圆核”和“不清晰染色质”进行了统计和预测研究,以区分braf样征象和其他假设的ras样卵泡征象。结果:BRAFV600E检出率为43/63(68.2%)。组织学类型差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001),其中经典型最为常见(31/63,49.2%),独立多因素分析比值比为10.58 [2.67;41.97]。滤泡细胞学征象与BRAFV600E呈负相关:滤泡结构(p < 0.001)、核圆(p = 0.015)、染色质清晰(p = 0.049),而诊断因素:“非滤泡性”(阳性预测值[PPV] 82.9,敏感性79.1,阴性预测值[NPV] 59.1,特异性65.0)、“非圆形核”(PPV 76.6,敏感性83.7,NPV 56.3,特异性45.0)和“不透明染色质”(PPV 75.6,敏感性79.1,NPV 50.0,特异性45.0)对突变具有预测价值。其余的细胞学特征没有个体意义。结论:我们的研究发现甲状腺FNA的细胞形态学征象与BRAFV600E突变之间没有关联。考虑到Bethesda系统,V类和VI类PTC突变与大量病例存在关联(p = 0.045)。然而,我们的研究结果表明,甲状腺乳头状癌活检中出现“非滤泡”、“非圆核”和“不清晰染色质”的体征可预测BRAF型突变,而根据已发表的文献,滤泡体征提示RAS型PTC。这些结果需要进一步的研究来证实或修正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Cytologica
Acta Cytologica 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With articles offering an excellent balance between clinical cytology and cytopathology, ''Acta Cytologica'' fosters the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms behind cytomorphology and thus facilitates the translation of frontline research into clinical practice. As the official journal of the International Academy of Cytology and affiliated to over 50 national cytology societies around the world, ''Acta Cytologica'' evaluates new and existing diagnostic applications of scientific advances as well as their clinical correlations. Original papers, review articles, meta-analyses, novel insights from clinical practice, and letters to the editor cover topics from diagnostic cytopathology, gynecologic and non-gynecologic cytopathology to fine needle aspiration, molecular techniques and their diagnostic applications. As the perfect reference for practical use, ''Acta Cytologica'' addresses a multidisciplinary audience practicing clinical cytopathology, cell biology, oncology, interventional radiology, otorhinolaryngology, gastroenterology, urology, pulmonology and preventive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Reclassification of Urinary Cytology according to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology Correlation with Histological Diagnosis. Cytopathology of a Newly Described Salivary Gland Neoplasm: A Case Report of Microsecretory Adenocarcinoma Presenting in the Parotid Gland. Does the Diagnostic Performance of the Pathologist on the Indeterminate Categories of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology Vary between Pediatric and Adult Patients? Evaluation of a Cytology-Molecular Co-Test in Liquid-Based Cytology-Processed Urine for Defining Indeterminate Categories of the Paris System. Diagnostic and Predictive Immunocytochemistry in Lung Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1