首页 > 最新文献

Acta Cytologica最新文献

英文 中文
Pearls and Pitfalls of Real-Life Molecular Testing on FNA and Core Biopsy in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Practice. 胰腺腺癌实践中FNA和核心活检的现实分子检测的优点和缺陷。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1159/000549794
Cisel Aydin Mericoz, Ibrahim Kulac, Emrah Alper, Volkan Adsay, Pinar Firat

Background/objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently requires neo-adjuvant therapy, leaving cytologic preparations-especially endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) smears-as the only naïve tissue available for molecular testing. However, their applicability remains underappreciated due to limited data and concerns about specimen adequacy. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of performing molecular analysis on cytologic smears to detect targetable alterations in PDAC.

Methods: Molecular analysis was conducted on 120 PDAC samples: 41 cytology specimens, 50 core biopsies, and 29 resections. KRAS mutations and homologous recombination repair gene alterations were assessed. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) guided triage in all FNA cases. DNA and RNA isolation were performed, followed by quality control (QC) assessment and sequencing.

Results: DNA isolation succeeded in 92/95 cases (97%), with a 100% success rate in cytologic specimens. RNA isolation passed QC in 71/84 samples (83%), with failures more common in smears (n=8). KRAS mutations were detected in 71/85 patients (82%), with the highest detection in cytologic specimens (92%) compared to biopsies (78%) and resections(80%).

Conclusion: Molecular testing is feasible and may even be more successful in cytologic smears than in biopsies or resections. High diagnostic yield and rapid processing favor their integration into routine molecular workflows. The superior performance of smears may relate to reduced stromal content and minimal processing delays. Cytologic specimens showed 100% DNA QC success, even when RNA QC failed, supporting their reliability. Although RNA analysis had a modest failure rate, its overall success suggests it can be incorporated into routine testing, particularly as fusion-driven targets gain clinical relevance.

背景/目的:胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)经常需要新辅助治疗,留下细胞学准备-特别是内镜超声引导细针穿刺(EUS-FNA)涂片-作为唯一可用于分子检测的naïve组织。然而,由于有限的数据和对标本充足性的担忧,它们的适用性仍未得到充分认识。本研究旨在评估在细胞学涂片上进行分子分析以检测PDAC可靶向改变的可行性。方法:对120例PDAC标本进行分子分析,其中细胞学标本41例,核心活检标本50例,切除标本29例。评估KRAS突变和同源重组修复基因的改变。快速现场评估(ROSE)指导所有FNA病例的分诊。进行DNA和RNA分离,然后进行质量控制(QC)评估和测序。结果:DNA分离成功率92/95例(97%),细胞学标本分离成功率100%。71/84个样本(83%)的RNA分离通过QC检测,涂片检测更常见(n=8)。在71/85例患者(82%)中检测到KRAS突变,细胞学标本(92%)的检出率最高,而活检(78%)和切除(80%)的检出率最高。结论:分子检测在细胞学涂片中是可行的,甚至可能比在活检或切除中更成功。高诊断收率和快速处理有利于将其整合到常规分子工作流程中。涂片的优越性能可能与减少基质含量和最小的处理延迟有关。细胞学标本显示100% DNA QC成功,即使RNA QC失败,支持其可靠性。尽管RNA分析的失败率不高,但它的总体成功表明,它可以纳入常规测试,特别是当融合驱动靶标获得临床相关性时。
{"title":"Pearls and Pitfalls of Real-Life Molecular Testing on FNA and Core Biopsy in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Practice.","authors":"Cisel Aydin Mericoz, Ibrahim Kulac, Emrah Alper, Volkan Adsay, Pinar Firat","doi":"10.1159/000549794","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549794","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently requires neo-adjuvant therapy, leaving cytologic preparations-especially endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) smears-as the only naïve tissue available for molecular testing. However, their applicability remains underappreciated due to limited data and concerns about specimen adequacy. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of performing molecular analysis on cytologic smears to detect targetable alterations in PDAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Molecular analysis was conducted on 120 PDAC samples: 41 cytology specimens, 50 core biopsies, and 29 resections. KRAS mutations and homologous recombination repair gene alterations were assessed. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) guided triage in all FNA cases. DNA and RNA isolation were performed, followed by quality control (QC) assessment and sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DNA isolation succeeded in 92/95 cases (97%), with a 100% success rate in cytologic specimens. RNA isolation passed QC in 71/84 samples (83%), with failures more common in smears (n=8). KRAS mutations were detected in 71/85 patients (82%), with the highest detection in cytologic specimens (92%) compared to biopsies (78%) and resections(80%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Molecular testing is feasible and may even be more successful in cytologic smears than in biopsies or resections. High diagnostic yield and rapid processing favor their integration into routine molecular workflows. The superior performance of smears may relate to reduced stromal content and minimal processing delays. Cytologic specimens showed 100% DNA QC success, even when RNA QC failed, supporting their reliability. Although RNA analysis had a modest failure rate, its overall success suggests it can be incorporated into routine testing, particularly as fusion-driven targets gain clinical relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145740459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the Impact of Sample Volume on Cytological Diagnosis of Pleural Effusion: A Single-Institution Study Using the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology. 评估样本量对胸腔积液细胞学诊断的影响:一项使用国际浆液细胞病理学报告系统的单机构研究。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1159/000549982
Rachana Meena, Sherrin Jacob, Prabhat Singh Malik, Anant Mohan, Sandeep Mathur, Venkateswaran K Iyer, Aruna Nambirajan, Deepali Jain

Introduction: Malignant pleural effusion is a frequent manifestation in cancer patients, with effusion cytology playing a vital role in diagnosis and subtyping. Present study evaluated the effect of sample volume on malignancy detection and estimated the risk of malignancy (ROM) by using the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS).

Methods: Pleural effusions submitted from May 2021 to December 2022 were reclassified using the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS) into five categories: non-diagnostic (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypia of uncertain significance (AUS), suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and malignant (MAL). Risk of malignancy (ROM) and performance metrics were calculated based on follow-up histology and/or repeat cytology, ancillary tests and clinico-radiology. Volume data from 493 samples were grouped into six bins (0-10 mL to >300 mL), and malignancy fractions were analysed. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) logistic regression assessed the impact of volume, sex, and age on diagnostic outcomes. Analysis was performed in R.

Results: Of 1265 samples from 1107 patients, 875 (69.2%) had follow-up data. ROM estimates were: ND 23.6%, NFM 11.6%, AUS 57.1%, SFM 100%, MAL 97.5%. MAL samples had significantly higher median volume than NFM (100 vs 35 mL; p<0.000). False negatives had lower volumes than true positives (50 vs 80 mL; p=0.027). Malignancy detection was lowest in samples <10 mL (7.4%) and highest in >300 mL (40.4%). Volumes <25 mL were significantly associated with reduced odds of malignancy detection (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Sample volumes <25 mL are linked to lower malignancy detection, underscoring the importance of adequate volume and supporting TIS implementation in routine cytology.

恶性胸腔积液是癌症患者的常见表现,积液细胞学在诊断和分型中起着重要作用。本研究利用国际浆液细胞病理学报告系统(TIS)评估了样本量对恶性肿瘤检测的影响,并估计了恶性肿瘤(ROM)的风险。方法:使用国际浆液细胞病理学报告系统(TIS)将2021年5月至2022年12月提交的胸腔积液重新分类为五类:非诊断性(ND)、恶性阴性(NFM)、意义不确定的非典型性(AUS)、可疑恶性(SFM)和恶性(MAL)。根据随访组织学和/或重复细胞学、辅助检查和临床放射学计算恶性肿瘤风险(ROM)和表现指标。493份样本的体积数据分为6个箱(0-10 mL至100 - 300 mL),并分析恶性部分。广义估计方程(GEE)逻辑回归评估了体积、性别和年龄对诊断结果的影响。结果:在1107例患者的1265份样本中,875例(69.2%)有随访资料。ROM估计为:ND 23.6%, NFM 11.6%, AUS 57.1%, SFM 100%, MAL 97.5%。MAL样品的中位体积明显高于NFM (100 vs 35 mL; p300 mL(40.4%))。结论:样品体积
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Sample Volume on Cytological Diagnosis of Pleural Effusion: A Single-Institution Study Using the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology.","authors":"Rachana Meena, Sherrin Jacob, Prabhat Singh Malik, Anant Mohan, Sandeep Mathur, Venkateswaran K Iyer, Aruna Nambirajan, Deepali Jain","doi":"10.1159/000549982","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549982","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Malignant pleural effusion is a frequent manifestation in cancer patients, with effusion cytology playing a vital role in diagnosis and subtyping. Present study evaluated the effect of sample volume on malignancy detection and estimated the risk of malignancy (ROM) by using the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pleural effusions submitted from May 2021 to December 2022 were reclassified using the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS) into five categories: non-diagnostic (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypia of uncertain significance (AUS), suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and malignant (MAL). Risk of malignancy (ROM) and performance metrics were calculated based on follow-up histology and/or repeat cytology, ancillary tests and clinico-radiology. Volume data from 493 samples were grouped into six bins (0-10 mL to >300 mL), and malignancy fractions were analysed. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) logistic regression assessed the impact of volume, sex, and age on diagnostic outcomes. Analysis was performed in R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1265 samples from 1107 patients, 875 (69.2%) had follow-up data. ROM estimates were: ND 23.6%, NFM 11.6%, AUS 57.1%, SFM 100%, MAL 97.5%. MAL samples had significantly higher median volume than NFM (100 vs 35 mL; p<0.000). False negatives had lower volumes than true positives (50 vs 80 mL; p=0.027). Malignancy detection was lowest in samples <10 mL (7.4%) and highest in >300 mL (40.4%). Volumes <25 mL were significantly associated with reduced odds of malignancy detection (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sample volumes <25 mL are linked to lower malignancy detection, underscoring the importance of adequate volume and supporting TIS implementation in routine cytology.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145706960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Blastemal Tumours: Cytological Features and the Usefulness of Fine Needle Aspiration. 母质肿瘤:细胞学特征和细针穿刺的用处。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1159/000549899
Pawel Gajdzis, Jerzy Klijanienko

Background Blastemal tumours are quite frequent malignancies in childhood. In many oncological centres, fine needle aspiration is a part of the specific diagnostic procedure. In this review, the cytological features of the most common entities - i.e., neuroblastic tumours, nephroblastomas, retinoblastomas and hepatoblastomas - are covered. Summary Blastemal tumours are composed of blastemal cells, which are frequently rounded or oval. This morphological similarity among different entities requires detailed clinical and radiological information for accurate diagnosis. Cytological specimens play a crucial role, especially when histological specimens are not available or in cases where a prompt initiation of treatment is needed. Key messages Cytological smears are highly cellular and show specific patterns for accurate histological typing. The hypercellularity of cytological specimen allows for the use of high-quality material for ancillary techniques, which are important for assessing several prognostic factors.

背景:胚质肿瘤是儿童期常见的恶性肿瘤。在许多肿瘤中心,细针穿刺是特定诊断程序的一部分。本文综述了神经母细胞瘤、肾母细胞瘤、视网膜母细胞瘤和肝母细胞瘤等最常见肿瘤的细胞学特征。囊胚肿瘤由囊胚细胞组成,通常为圆形或椭圆形。不同实体之间的这种形态相似性需要详细的临床和放射学信息才能准确诊断。细胞学标本起着至关重要的作用,特别是在没有组织学标本或需要立即开始治疗的情况下。细胞学涂片是高度细胞化的,并显示准确的组织学分型的特定模式。细胞学标本的高细胞性允许使用高质量的辅助技术材料,这对评估几个预后因素很重要。
{"title":"Blastemal Tumours: Cytological Features and the Usefulness of Fine Needle Aspiration.","authors":"Pawel Gajdzis, Jerzy Klijanienko","doi":"10.1159/000549899","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549899","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Blastemal tumours are quite frequent malignancies in childhood. In many oncological centres, fine needle aspiration is a part of the specific diagnostic procedure. In this review, the cytological features of the most common entities - i.e., neuroblastic tumours, nephroblastomas, retinoblastomas and hepatoblastomas - are covered. Summary Blastemal tumours are composed of blastemal cells, which are frequently rounded or oval. This morphological similarity among different entities requires detailed clinical and radiological information for accurate diagnosis. Cytological specimens play a crucial role, especially when histological specimens are not available or in cases where a prompt initiation of treatment is needed. Key messages Cytological smears are highly cellular and show specific patterns for accurate histological typing. The hypercellularity of cytological specimen allows for the use of high-quality material for ancillary techniques, which are important for assessing several prognostic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cytological Assessment of Paediatric Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review. 儿科乳腺病变的细胞学评估:系统综述。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1159/000549243
Ana Elisa Teles, Fernando C Schmitt

Introduction: Paediatric breast lesions are rare and mostly benign. Despite their benign nature, the presence of these lesions in this population often raises concerns. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) offers a minimally invasive, though its application in paediatric populations remains debated due to interpretative challenges. This systematic review aims to assess the utility, limitations, and diagnostic performance of FNAB in the evaluation of paediatric breast lesions.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed for articles published from January 2014 to February 2025. Non-humans and non-English language reports were excluded. Based on title and abstract screening, 25 articles were selected, and 13 additional articles were retrieved through reference list, yielding a total of 38 studies for qualitative analysis. Data were manually extracted and synthesized.

Results: Benign lesions represented the majority of cases, with fibroadenomas being the most frequent (65%-95%), followed by benign phyllodes tumours, hamartomas, tubular adenomas, pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH), and cystic lesions. Malignant lesions were rare and included metastatic tumours, malignant phyllodes tumours, secretory carcinoma, and primary breast sarcomas. FNAB demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for benign lesions but showed limitations in distinguishing benign from malignant tumours. ROSE was identified as a valuable adjunct, improving sample adequacy, reducing the rate of inconclusive results, and enhancing diagnostic reliability.

Conclusion: FNAB is an effective first-line diagnostic modality for paediatric breast lesions, offering high accuracy for benign conditions. However, limitations exist in discriminating borderline and malignant lesions, warranting correlation with clinical, radiological findings, and, in some cases, core biopsy confirmation. The integration of ROSE enhances FNAB diagnostic yield and may further refine management strategies. A multidisciplinary approach remains essential to ensure optimal, minimally invasive care for paediatric patients.

儿童乳腺病变是罕见的,大多是良性的。尽管它们是良性的,但这些病变在这一人群中的存在经常引起人们的关注。细针穿刺活检(FNAB)提供了一种微创的方法,尽管由于解释上的挑战,其在儿科人群中的应用仍存在争议。本系统综述旨在评估FNAB在儿科乳腺病变评估中的效用、局限性和诊断性能。方法:系统检索PubMed中2014年1月至2025年2月发表的文章。非人类和非英语语言的报告被排除在外。通过题目和摘要筛选,选取25篇文章,通过参考文献列表检索13篇文章,共38篇研究进行定性分析。人工提取和合成数据。结果:良性病变占多数,以纤维腺瘤最常见(65%-95%),其次为良性叶状瘤、错构瘤、管状腺瘤、假性血管瘤间质增生(PASH)和囊性病变。恶性病变罕见,包括转移瘤、恶性叶状瘤、分泌性癌和原发性乳腺肉瘤。FNAB对良性病变具有较高的诊断准确性,但在区分良性肿瘤和恶性肿瘤方面存在局限性。ROSE被认为是一种有价值的辅助手段,提高了样本充分性,降低了不确定结果的发生率,提高了诊断的可靠性。结论:FNAB是一种有效的儿科乳腺病变一线诊断方法,对良性病变具有较高的准确性。然而,在区分交界性和恶性病变方面存在局限性,需要与临床、放射学检查结果相关联,在某些情况下,需要核心活检确认。ROSE的整合提高了FNAB的诊断率,并可能进一步完善管理策略。多学科的方法仍然是必不可少的,以确保最佳的,微创护理儿科患者。
{"title":"Cytological Assessment of Paediatric Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ana Elisa Teles, Fernando C Schmitt","doi":"10.1159/000549243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549243","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Paediatric breast lesions are rare and mostly benign. Despite their benign nature, the presence of these lesions in this population often raises concerns. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) offers a minimally invasive, though its application in paediatric populations remains debated due to interpretative challenges. This systematic review aims to assess the utility, limitations, and diagnostic performance of FNAB in the evaluation of paediatric breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in PubMed for articles published from January 2014 to February 2025. Non-humans and non-English language reports were excluded. Based on title and abstract screening, 25 articles were selected, and 13 additional articles were retrieved through reference list, yielding a total of 38 studies for qualitative analysis. Data were manually extracted and synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Benign lesions represented the majority of cases, with fibroadenomas being the most frequent (65%-95%), followed by benign phyllodes tumours, hamartomas, tubular adenomas, pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH), and cystic lesions. Malignant lesions were rare and included metastatic tumours, malignant phyllodes tumours, secretory carcinoma, and primary breast sarcomas. FNAB demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for benign lesions but showed limitations in distinguishing benign from malignant tumours. ROSE was identified as a valuable adjunct, improving sample adequacy, reducing the rate of inconclusive results, and enhancing diagnostic reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNAB is an effective first-line diagnostic modality for paediatric breast lesions, offering high accuracy for benign conditions. However, limitations exist in discriminating borderline and malignant lesions, warranting correlation with clinical, radiological findings, and, in some cases, core biopsy confirmation. The integration of ROSE enhances FNAB diagnostic yield and may further refine management strategies. A multidisciplinary approach remains essential to ensure optimal, minimally invasive care for paediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145675942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cytological Features of Spindle Cell Lesions of Head and Neck and Review of the Literature. 头颈部梭形细胞病变的细胞学特征及文献复习。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI: 10.1159/000549796
Kivilcim Eren Ateş, Aysun Hatice Uğuz, Ivana Kholová, Aslı Aydoğdu Yeşiloğlu, Gülfiliz Gönlüşen, Hatice Elmas

Introduction: Spindle cell lesions in the head and neck often mimic sarcomas but may include a wide range of benign and malignant entities. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a minimally invasive method used to evaluate such lesions, though cytological interpretation can be challenging due to overlapping features.

Methods: This retrospective study included 12 primary spindle cell lesions of the head and neck, selected based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Papanicolaou and May-Grünwald-Giemsa stains were used for smear evaluation. Cell blocks were prepared, and cytological diagnoses were compared with histopathological outcomes.

Results: The 12 cases were diagnosed as follows: nodular fasciitis (n=2), schwannoma (n=2), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (n=1), leiomyosarcoma (n=1), liposarcoma (n=1), rhabdomyosarcoma (n=1), osteosarcoma (n=3), and chondroblastoma (n=1). Cytological features showed moderate correlation with final histology.

Conclusion: FNA is a valuable, cost-effective tool for evaluating spindle cell lesions in the head and neck. While morphological overlap poses diagnostic limitations, ancillary techniques and molecular studies enhance its accuracy and clinical utility.

头部和颈部的梭形细胞病变通常类似于肉瘤,但可能包括广泛的良性和恶性实体。细针穿刺(FNA)是一种用于评估此类病变的微创方法,尽管由于重叠的特征,细胞学解释可能具有挑战性。方法:本回顾性研究包括12例头颈部原发梭形细胞病变,根据纳入/排除标准进行选择。使用Papanicolaou和may - grind - giemsa染色进行涂片评估。制备细胞块,并将细胞学诊断与组织病理学结果进行比较。结果:12例确诊为结节性筋膜炎(2例)、神经鞘瘤(2例)、周围神经鞘恶性肿瘤(1例)、平滑肌肉瘤(1例)、脂肪肉瘤(1例)、横纹肌肉瘤(1例)、骨肉瘤(3例)、成软骨细胞瘤(1例)。细胞学特征与最终组织学有中度相关性。结论:FNA是评估头颈部梭形细胞病变的一种有价值的、经济的工具。虽然形态重叠造成诊断限制,辅助技术和分子研究提高其准确性和临床效用。
{"title":"Cytological Features of Spindle Cell Lesions of Head and Neck and Review of the Literature.","authors":"Kivilcim Eren Ateş, Aysun Hatice Uğuz, Ivana Kholová, Aslı Aydoğdu Yeşiloğlu, Gülfiliz Gönlüşen, Hatice Elmas","doi":"10.1159/000549796","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549796","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spindle cell lesions in the head and neck often mimic sarcomas but may include a wide range of benign and malignant entities. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a minimally invasive method used to evaluate such lesions, though cytological interpretation can be challenging due to overlapping features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 12 primary spindle cell lesions of the head and neck, selected based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Papanicolaou and May-Grünwald-Giemsa stains were used for smear evaluation. Cell blocks were prepared, and cytological diagnoses were compared with histopathological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 12 cases were diagnosed as follows: nodular fasciitis (n=2), schwannoma (n=2), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (n=1), leiomyosarcoma (n=1), liposarcoma (n=1), rhabdomyosarcoma (n=1), osteosarcoma (n=3), and chondroblastoma (n=1). Cytological features showed moderate correlation with final histology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNA is a valuable, cost-effective tool for evaluating spindle cell lesions in the head and neck. While morphological overlap poses diagnostic limitations, ancillary techniques and molecular studies enhance its accuracy and clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145627728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cytological Features of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Diagnosed on Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with Literature Review. 细胞学诊断的转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌的细胞学特征:单中心经验和文献综述。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.1159/000549506
Isabella Sorice, Anna Maria Carillo, Maria Salatiello, Pasquale Pisapia, Elena Vigliar, Giancarlo Troncone, Claudio Bellevicine

Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma frequently metastasizes to multiple sites, which often poses significant diagnostic challenges, particularly when the primary tumor is unknown or occult. This retrospective study analyzed 43 fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases of metastatic ccRCC from a single institution to characterize metastatic patterns and evaluate the diagnostic utility of cytology combined with immunocytochemistry.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed FNA cases diagnosed as metastatic RCC from January 2003 to December 2024. Cytopathological evaluation included cellularity, architectural patterns, cytoplasmic and nuclear features, background elements, and immunocytochemical analysis when available.

Results: Cytology demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance. The majority of cases were reported as Malignant (91%), while the remaining 9% were classified as Suspicious for Malignancy (SFM) or Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS). Notably, in 42% of cases, FNA established the initial diagnosis of RCC, highlighting its value in detecting occult primary tumors. Diagnostic accuracy relied on cytomorphologic evaluation, complemented by immunocytochemical profiling, which was performed on cell blocks in 60.4% of cases.

Discussion: Key markers such as PAX8, CD10, and RCCma were critical in confirming renal origin and differentiating ccRCC from morphologically similar neoplasms in each organ.

Conclusion: FNA cytology, corroborated by focused immunocytochemistry, plays a key role in diagnosing metastatic ccRCC, particularly when the presentation is uncommon or the primary tumor is hidden. This integrated method supports effective clinical management, avoiding unnecessary surgery in cases that may benefit from systemic therapy.

导言:肾细胞癌经常转移到多个部位,这通常给诊断带来重大挑战,特别是当原发肿瘤未知或隐匿时。本回顾性研究分析了来自同一机构的43例细针穿刺(FNA)转移性ccRCC病例,以表征转移模式并评估细胞学与免疫细胞化学相结合的诊断价值。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2003年1月至2024年12月诊断为转移性RCC的FNA病例。细胞病理学评估包括细胞结构、结构模式、细胞质和核特征、背景元素以及可用的免疫细胞化学分析。结果:细胞学表现出良好的诊断性能。大多数病例报告为恶性(91%),而剩余的9%被归类为可疑恶性(SFM)或不确定意义的异型(AUS)。值得注意的是,在42%的病例中,FNA建立了RCC的初步诊断,突出了其在检测隐匿原发肿瘤方面的价值。诊断准确性依赖于细胞形态学评估,辅以免疫细胞化学分析,60.4%的病例在细胞块上进行了免疫细胞化学分析。讨论:关键标志物如PAX8、CD10和RCCma在确认肾源性和将ccRCC与各器官形态相似的肿瘤区分开来方面至关重要。结论:FNA细胞学检查与聚焦免疫细胞化学证实,在诊断转移性ccRCC中起关键作用,特别是当表现不常见或原发肿瘤隐藏时。这种综合方法支持有效的临床管理,避免了可能受益于全身治疗的病例不必要的手术。
{"title":"Cytological Features of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Diagnosed on Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with Literature Review.","authors":"Isabella Sorice, Anna Maria Carillo, Maria Salatiello, Pasquale Pisapia, Elena Vigliar, Giancarlo Troncone, Claudio Bellevicine","doi":"10.1159/000549506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549506","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Renal cell carcinoma frequently metastasizes to multiple sites, which often poses significant diagnostic challenges, particularly when the primary tumor is unknown or occult. This retrospective study analyzed 43 fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases of metastatic ccRCC from a single institution to characterize metastatic patterns and evaluate the diagnostic utility of cytology combined with immunocytochemistry.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed FNA cases diagnosed as metastatic RCC from January 2003 to December 2024. Cytopathological evaluation included cellularity, architectural patterns, cytoplasmic and nuclear features, background elements, and immunocytochemical analysis when available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cytology demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance. The majority of cases were reported as Malignant (91%), while the remaining 9% were classified as Suspicious for Malignancy (SFM) or Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS). Notably, in 42% of cases, FNA established the initial diagnosis of RCC, highlighting its value in detecting occult primary tumors. Diagnostic accuracy relied on cytomorphologic evaluation, complemented by immunocytochemical profiling, which was performed on cell blocks in 60.4% of cases.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Key markers such as PAX8, CD10, and RCCma were critical in confirming renal origin and differentiating ccRCC from morphologically similar neoplasms in each organ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNA cytology, corroborated by focused immunocytochemistry, plays a key role in diagnosing metastatic ccRCC, particularly when the presentation is uncommon or the primary tumor is hidden. This integrated method supports effective clinical management, avoiding unnecessary surgery in cases that may benefit from systemic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145627709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Liquid-based oral brush cytology: evaluation of two artificial intelligence models in Papanicolaou and Silver-Stained Nucleolar Organizer Region (AgNOR) analyses. 液体口腔刷细胞学:两种人工智能模型在Papanicolaou和银染色核仁组织区(AgNOR)分析中的评价。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1159/000549618
Ana Laura Ferrares Espinosa, Igor Cavalcante Guedes, Nathalia Baldicera Lopes, Erick Souza Pedraça, Gisele Schuler Piccoli, Roane Lemos da Silva, Tatiana Wannmacher Lepper, Natália Batista Daroit, Fernanda Visioli, Manuel M Oliveira, Pantelis Varvaki Rados

Introduction: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most prevalent oral malignant neoplasm. Cytopathology may represent an important tool in the screening of OSCC, and liquid-based oral brush cytology (LBOBC) has been widely studied because of its clearer cell sample results. These cytopathological analyses could be more efficient with the aid of artificial intelligence (AI). The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of two AI models (Papanicolaou and AgNOR Slide Image Examiners) in LBOBC analyses.

Methods: Two human evaluators and the AI models performed cell maturation pattern analysis and mean nucleolar organizer region (NOR) per nucleus count in Papanicolaou and silver-stained nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR) oral cytopathological samples of 20 individuals, respectively. Inter-evaluator agreement was evaluated by kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Chi-square and Wilcoxon matched-pairs/Friedman tests analyzed differences between the conventional and LBOBC methods, and among evaluators.

Results: Kappa between the Papanicolaou AI model and each human researcher was substantial (k = 0.69) for the conventional method, and moderate for the LBOBC (k = 0.55-0.53. There were statistical differences in the cellular type analysis between cytology methods and among evaluators (p < 0.001). The automated AgNOR model showed an excellent/highly good agreement with human evaluators for NOR count in both cytology methods, with and without bounding boxes. There was no statistical difference in the NOR count between methods (p > 0.05). In the conventional method, there were differences among evaluators (p < 0.05); in the LBOBC, there were not (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The AgNOR automated model is reliable when assessing NOR count in oral samples processed by different cytological methods, when compared to the human analysis. The Papanicolaou model still needs more training with LBOBC samples.

口腔鳞状细胞癌(Oral squamous cell carcinoma, OSCC)是最常见的口腔恶性肿瘤。细胞病理学可能是OSCC筛查的重要工具,液体口腔刷细胞学(liquid-based oral brush cytoology, LBOBC)因其更清晰的细胞样本结果而被广泛研究。在人工智能(AI)的帮助下,这些细胞病理学分析可能会更有效。本研究的目的是分析两种人工智能模型(Papanicolaou和AgNOR滑动图像检查器)在LBOBC分析中的有效性。方法:两名人类评估者和人工智能模型分别对20例个体的Papanicolaou和银染色核仁组织区(AgNOR)口腔细胞病理学样本进行细胞成熟模式分析和每核平均核仁组织区(NOR)计数。评价者间一致性采用kappa和类内相关系数(ICC)进行评价。卡方和Wilcoxon配对对/Friedman检验分析了传统方法和LBOBC方法之间以及评估者之间的差异。结果:Papanicolaou人工智能模型与每个人类研究人员之间的Kappa对于传统方法来说是相当大的(k = 0.69),对于LBOBC来说是中等的(k = 0.55-0.53)。细胞学方法和评估者之间的细胞类型分析有统计学差异(p < 0.001)。自动AgNOR模型在两种细胞学方法中,无论是否有边界框,都与人类评估者的NOR计数显示出极好的/高度一致。两种方法的NOR计数比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在常规方法中,评价者间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05);LBOBC无差异(p < 0.05)。结论:与人体分析相比,AgNOR自动化模型在评估经不同细胞学方法处理的口腔样本中的NOR计数时是可靠的。Papanicolaou模型仍然需要更多的LBOBC样本训练。
{"title":"Liquid-based oral brush cytology: evaluation of two artificial intelligence models in Papanicolaou and Silver-Stained Nucleolar Organizer Region (AgNOR) analyses.","authors":"Ana Laura Ferrares Espinosa, Igor Cavalcante Guedes, Nathalia Baldicera Lopes, Erick Souza Pedraça, Gisele Schuler Piccoli, Roane Lemos da Silva, Tatiana Wannmacher Lepper, Natália Batista Daroit, Fernanda Visioli, Manuel M Oliveira, Pantelis Varvaki Rados","doi":"10.1159/000549618","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549618","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most prevalent oral malignant neoplasm. Cytopathology may represent an important tool in the screening of OSCC, and liquid-based oral brush cytology (LBOBC) has been widely studied because of its clearer cell sample results. These cytopathological analyses could be more efficient with the aid of artificial intelligence (AI). The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of two AI models (Papanicolaou and AgNOR Slide Image Examiners) in LBOBC analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two human evaluators and the AI models performed cell maturation pattern analysis and mean nucleolar organizer region (NOR) per nucleus count in Papanicolaou and silver-stained nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR) oral cytopathological samples of 20 individuals, respectively. Inter-evaluator agreement was evaluated by kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Chi-square and Wilcoxon matched-pairs/Friedman tests analyzed differences between the conventional and LBOBC methods, and among evaluators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kappa between the Papanicolaou AI model and each human researcher was substantial (k = 0.69) for the conventional method, and moderate for the LBOBC (k = 0.55-0.53. There were statistical differences in the cellular type analysis between cytology methods and among evaluators (p < 0.001). The automated AgNOR model showed an excellent/highly good agreement with human evaluators for NOR count in both cytology methods, with and without bounding boxes. There was no statistical difference in the NOR count between methods (p > 0.05). In the conventional method, there were differences among evaluators (p < 0.05); in the LBOBC, there were not (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AgNOR automated model is reliable when assessing NOR count in oral samples processed by different cytological methods, when compared to the human analysis. The Papanicolaou model still needs more training with LBOBC samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145572769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic performance of Adrenal Gland cytology following the World Health Organisation (WHO) standardized categories - Systematic review and Meta-analysis. 遵循世界卫生组织(WHO)标准化分类的肾上腺细胞学诊断性能——系统评价和荟萃分析。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1159/000549667
Jitendra Singh Nigam, Jyotsna Naresh Bharti, Immanuel Pradeep, Ashutosh Rath

Introduction: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) reporting systems for adrenal gland cytology lack global uniformity. Implementing a standardized global reporting system would improve diagnostic accuracy, risk assessment, clinical communication, and uniformity in adrenal gland cytology practices worldwide. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the proposed WHO standardized reporting categories for adrenal gland cytology and evaluate the role of FNAC in adrenal lesion diagnosis.

Material and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases up to June 2024. Studies with more than 15 patients were included. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed for quality assessment of the selected studies. Heterogeneity and publication bias among the studies were also evaluated. Cytological categories were recategorized according to the proposed WHO reporting system. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and risk of malignancy (ROM) ranges for each cytological category were calculated.

Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled diagnostic performance across studies showed high sensitivity (92.2%) and high specificity (99.5%). Heterogeneity and publication bias were low. Range and pooled ROM across cytology categories were: Inadequate/nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory - 0% to 100% (18%), Benign - 0% to 14.7% (3.7%), Atypical category - 0% to 50% (46.2%), "Suspicious for malignancy" - 0% to 100% (76.5%), and Malignant category - 94.4% to 100% (99.6%) Conclusion: High sensitivity and specificity, as well as ROM values across categories, demonstrate that the proposed WHO cytological categories offer reliable risk stratification for adrenal lesions, supporting accurate diagnosis and treatment decisions. The low heterogeneity and minimal publication bias ensure that the findings are applicable across various clinical settings and patient populations.

肾上腺细胞学的细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)报告系统缺乏全球一致性。实施标准化的全球报告系统将提高诊断准确性、风险评估、临床交流和全球肾上腺细胞学实践的统一性。当前的系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在评估WHO建议的肾上腺细胞学标准化报告类别,并评估FNAC在肾上腺病变诊断中的作用。材料和方法:综合检索PubMed、Scopus和Embase数据库,截止到2024年6月。纳入了超过15例患者的研究。采用QUADAS-2工具对所选研究进行质量评估。对研究的异质性和发表偏倚也进行了评价。根据拟议的世卫组织报告制度对细胞学分类进行了重新分类。计算每个细胞学分类的敏感性、特异性和恶性肿瘤风险(ROM)范围。结果:15项研究符合纳入标准。所有研究的综合诊断表现显示高敏感性(92.2%)和高特异性(99.5%)。异质性和发表偏倚较低。细胞学分类的范围和汇总ROM为:不充分/非诊断性/不满意- 0%至100%(18%),良性- 0%至14.7%(3.7%),非典型- 0%至50%(46.2%),“可疑恶性”- 0%至100%(76.5%),恶性- 94.4%至100%(99.6%)。高灵敏度和特异性以及跨类别的ROM值表明,拟议的世卫组织细胞学分类为肾上腺病变提供了可靠的风险分层,支持准确的诊断和治疗决策。低异质性和最小的发表偏倚确保了研究结果适用于各种临床环境和患者群体。
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of Adrenal Gland cytology following the World Health Organisation (WHO) standardized categories - Systematic review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Jitendra Singh Nigam, Jyotsna Naresh Bharti, Immanuel Pradeep, Ashutosh Rath","doi":"10.1159/000549667","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549667","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) reporting systems for adrenal gland cytology lack global uniformity. Implementing a standardized global reporting system would improve diagnostic accuracy, risk assessment, clinical communication, and uniformity in adrenal gland cytology practices worldwide. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the proposed WHO standardized reporting categories for adrenal gland cytology and evaluate the role of FNAC in adrenal lesion diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases up to June 2024. Studies with more than 15 patients were included. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed for quality assessment of the selected studies. Heterogeneity and publication bias among the studies were also evaluated. Cytological categories were recategorized according to the proposed WHO reporting system. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and risk of malignancy (ROM) ranges for each cytological category were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled diagnostic performance across studies showed high sensitivity (92.2%) and high specificity (99.5%). Heterogeneity and publication bias were low. Range and pooled ROM across cytology categories were: Inadequate/nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory - 0% to 100% (18%), Benign - 0% to 14.7% (3.7%), Atypical category - 0% to 50% (46.2%), \"Suspicious for malignancy\" - 0% to 100% (76.5%), and Malignant category - 94.4% to 100% (99.6%) Conclusion: High sensitivity and specificity, as well as ROM values across categories, demonstrate that the proposed WHO cytological categories offer reliable risk stratification for adrenal lesions, supporting accurate diagnosis and treatment decisions. The low heterogeneity and minimal publication bias ensure that the findings are applicable across various clinical settings and patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145562189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Special Issue: Cytopathology in Pediatrics. 儿科细胞病理学特刊。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1159/000549665
Jose Candido Caldeira Xavier-Júnior, Mauro Saieg
{"title":"Special Issue: Cytopathology in Pediatrics.","authors":"Jose Candido Caldeira Xavier-Júnior, Mauro Saieg","doi":"10.1159/000549665","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000549665","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145562151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
DIY Polarization: Validated Low-Cost Alternative for Birefringence in Histological and Cytological Analysis. DIY偏振:在组织学和细胞学分析中双折射验证的低成本选择。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-08 DOI: 10.1159/000549347
Giovanni Antunes Bonin, Wilson Jacob-Filho, Romeu Rodrigues de Souza, Ricardo Aparecido Baptista Nucci

Introduction: Birefringence analysis is an essential tool in both histological and cytological diagnostics, particularly with stains such as picrosirius red for collagen and Congo red for amyloid. However, polarized light microscopy remains limited in many laboratories due to cost and accessibility barriers. We describe a low-cost "do-it-yourself" (DIY) approach using commercial polarizing films to adapt a standard brightfield microscope for birefringence visualization.

Methods: Thirty gastrocnemius muscle sections stained with picrosirius red were analyzed using both a commercial polarized light system and the DIY setup. Quantitative image analysis was performed with ImageJ, and agreement between methods was assessed with ROC curve analysis.

Results: The DIY method achieved an AUC of 0.6252 (p = 0.0309) and 99% inter-observer concordance, demonstrating fair agreement with the commercial system.

Conclusion: This simple, validated method expands access to birefringence-based diagnostics and has potential applications in cytological contexts, such as amyloid detection in fine-needle aspirates and collagen assessment in cytospin preparations.

双折射分析是组织学和细胞学诊断的重要工具,特别是对胶原蛋白的小天狼星红和淀粉样蛋白的刚果红染色。然而,由于成本和可及性的障碍,偏振光显微镜在许多实验室仍然受到限制。我们描述了一种低成本的“自己动手”(DIY)方法,使用商业偏光片来适应标准明场显微镜的双折射可视化。方法:采用商业偏振光系统和自制装置对30块腓肠肌切片进行小天狼星红染色分析。采用ImageJ进行定量图像分析,并采用ROC曲线分析评价方法间的一致性。结果:DIY方法的AUC为0.6252 (p = 0.0309),观察者间一致性达99%,与商业系统基本一致。结论:这种简单、有效的方法扩展了基于双折射的诊断方法,并在细胞学背景下具有潜在的应用,例如细针抽吸中的淀粉样蛋白检测和细胞自旋制剂中的胶原蛋白评估。
{"title":"DIY Polarization: Validated Low-Cost Alternative for Birefringence in Histological and Cytological Analysis.","authors":"Giovanni Antunes Bonin, Wilson Jacob-Filho, Romeu Rodrigues de Souza, Ricardo Aparecido Baptista Nucci","doi":"10.1159/000549347","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000549347","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Birefringence analysis is an essential tool in both histological and cytological diagnostics, particularly with stains such as picrosirius red for collagen and Congo red for amyloid. However, polarized light microscopy remains limited in many laboratories due to cost and accessibility barriers. We describe a low-cost \"do-it-yourself\" (DIY) approach using commercial polarizing films to adapt a standard brightfield microscope for birefringence visualization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty gastrocnemius muscle sections stained with picrosirius red were analyzed using both a commercial polarized light system and the DIY setup. Quantitative image analysis was performed with ImageJ, and agreement between methods was assessed with ROC curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DIY method achieved an AUC of 0.6252 (p = 0.0309) and 99% inter-observer concordance, demonstrating fair agreement with the commercial system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This simple, validated method expands access to birefringence-based diagnostics and has potential applications in cytological contexts, such as amyloid detection in fine-needle aspirates and collagen assessment in cytospin preparations.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145476547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Acta Cytologica
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1