Engaging Black sexual minority women in breast cancer research: Lessons in community partnerships

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2023-07-25 DOI:10.1002/cncr.34960
Sophia R. Geffen MPH, MSN, RN, Tonia Poteat PhD, Lorraine T. Dean ScD, Jowanna Malone PhD, MSc, Naomi Greene PhD, Mary Anne Adams MSW
{"title":"Engaging Black sexual minority women in breast cancer research: Lessons in community partnerships","authors":"Sophia R. Geffen MPH, MSN, RN,&nbsp;Tonia Poteat PhD,&nbsp;Lorraine T. Dean ScD,&nbsp;Jowanna Malone PhD, MSc,&nbsp;Naomi Greene PhD,&nbsp;Mary Anne Adams MSW","doi":"10.1002/cncr.34960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Black sexual minority women (BSMW) face significant breast cancer health inequities and are underrepresented in health research because of historical and present-day exclusion. However, there exists no peer-reviewed literature on best practices for the inclusion of BSMW in cancer research. “Our Breast Health: The Access Project” was a national primary data collection study in June 2018 through October 2019 that aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to breast cancer care among BSMW, and that successfully recruited the highest number of BSMW for any national breast cancer screening study at the time of its publication.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The present analysis highlights best practices for reaching BSMW by examining by how effective various recruitment sources were at recruiting BSMW. Recruitment partners were grouped into several categories: (1) cancer focused, (2) Black women or sexual minority women focused, (3) BSMW focused, (4) social media, and (5) other. Then logistic regression was used to estimate the odds that a particular recruitment source category could recruit BSMW compared with other categories.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Partnerships with community-based organizations led by and intended for BSMW were the most successful at recruiting BSMW, demonstrating the importance of an intersectional approach to recruitment. Community-based organizations focused on BSMW specifically were 26 times more successful in recruiting BSMW to the study compared with recruiting Black women who were not sexual minorities (odds ratio, 26.43 [95% CI, 7.50–93.10]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Successful recruitment enables breast cancer research grounded in the perspectives of BSMW, which can generate key findings that have the potential to remedy longstanding health inequities for this population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"129 21","pages":"3439-3447"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.34960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Black sexual minority women (BSMW) face significant breast cancer health inequities and are underrepresented in health research because of historical and present-day exclusion. However, there exists no peer-reviewed literature on best practices for the inclusion of BSMW in cancer research. “Our Breast Health: The Access Project” was a national primary data collection study in June 2018 through October 2019 that aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to breast cancer care among BSMW, and that successfully recruited the highest number of BSMW for any national breast cancer screening study at the time of its publication.

Methods

The present analysis highlights best practices for reaching BSMW by examining by how effective various recruitment sources were at recruiting BSMW. Recruitment partners were grouped into several categories: (1) cancer focused, (2) Black women or sexual minority women focused, (3) BSMW focused, (4) social media, and (5) other. Then logistic regression was used to estimate the odds that a particular recruitment source category could recruit BSMW compared with other categories.

Results

Partnerships with community-based organizations led by and intended for BSMW were the most successful at recruiting BSMW, demonstrating the importance of an intersectional approach to recruitment. Community-based organizations focused on BSMW specifically were 26 times more successful in recruiting BSMW to the study compared with recruiting Black women who were not sexual minorities (odds ratio, 26.43 [95% CI, 7.50–93.10]).

Conclusions

Successful recruitment enables breast cancer research grounded in the perspectives of BSMW, which can generate key findings that have the potential to remedy longstanding health inequities for this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让黑人性少数群体妇女参与癌症研究:社区伙伴关系的教训。
背景:黑人性少数群体妇女(BSMW)面临着严重的癌症健康不平等,由于历史和当今的排斥,她们在健康研究中的代表性不足。然而,没有关于将BSMW纳入癌症研究的最佳实践的同行评议文献。“我们的乳腺健康:获取项目”是2018年6月至2019年10月的一项国家初级数据收集研究,旨在确定BSMW中乳腺癌症护理的推动者和障碍,并在其发表时成功招募了所有国家癌症筛查研究中人数最多的BSMW。方法:本分析通过考察各种招聘来源在招聘BSMW方面的有效性,强调了达到BSMW的最佳实践。招聘伙伴分为几个类别:(1)关注癌症,(2)关注黑人女性或性少数群体女性,(3)关注BSMW,(4)社交媒体,以及(5)其他。然后使用逻辑回归来估计特定招聘来源类别与其他类别相比能够招聘BSMW的几率。结果:与由BSMW领导并打算为BSMW建立的社区组织的伙伴关系在招聘BSMW方面最为成功,表明了跨部门招聘方法的重要性。与招募非性少数群体的黑人女性相比,专注于BSMW的社区组织招募BSMW参与研究的成功率高出26倍(优势比,26.43[95%CI,7.50-93.10]),这可以产生关键的发现,有可能纠正这一人群长期存在的健康不平等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-relevant outcomes in comprehensive cancer centers versus noncomprehensive cancer centers. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline update on palliative care for patients with cancer: Addressing the reality gap. Embrace with caution: The limitations of generative artificial intelligence in responding to patient health care queries. Expression of Concern. Global disparities in cancer care: Bridging the gap in affordability and access to medications between high and low-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1