Cytocompatibility and cell migration evaluation of calcium silicate-based root canal sealer compared to epoxide-amine resin sealer in stem cells from human apical papilla: An in-vitro study

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Australian Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1111/aej.12786
Linh Cao Hoai Nguyen DDS, MSc, Loc Nguyen Gia Pham DDS, Khoa Van Pham DDS, PhD, Minh Duc Nguyen DDS, MSc, Lan Thi Quynh Ngo DDS, PhD
{"title":"Cytocompatibility and cell migration evaluation of calcium silicate-based root canal sealer compared to epoxide-amine resin sealer in stem cells from human apical papilla: An in-vitro study","authors":"Linh Cao Hoai Nguyen DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Loc Nguyen Gia Pham DDS,&nbsp;Khoa Van Pham DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Minh Duc Nguyen DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Lan Thi Quynh Ngo DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1111/aej.12786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a calcium silicate-based sealers (CeraSeal) and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) on cytotoxicity and cell migration of stem cell from the human apical papilla (hSCAPs) by using the Alamar Blue, Annexin V-FICT and wound healing assays. In Alamar Blue assay, hSCAPs exposed to undiluted CeraSeal extract had significantly higher cell viability compared with that observed when cells were treated with AH Plus in all experimental period (p < 0.001). The flow cytometry analysis confirmed the comparison on viable cells and indicated that AH Plus increased apoptosis compared to CeraSeal and the control groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, AH Plus exhibited significantly lower level of cell migration than CeraSeal and the control for up to 48 h observation (p < 0.01). In summary, calcium silicate-based sealer (CeraSeal) is less cytotoxic and more biocompatible than epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus).","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a calcium silicate-based sealers (CeraSeal) and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) on cytotoxicity and cell migration of stem cell from the human apical papilla (hSCAPs) by using the Alamar Blue, Annexin V-FICT and wound healing assays. In Alamar Blue assay, hSCAPs exposed to undiluted CeraSeal extract had significantly higher cell viability compared with that observed when cells were treated with AH Plus in all experimental period (p < 0.001). The flow cytometry analysis confirmed the comparison on viable cells and indicated that AH Plus increased apoptosis compared to CeraSeal and the control groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, AH Plus exhibited significantly lower level of cell migration than CeraSeal and the control for up to 48 h observation (p < 0.01). In summary, calcium silicate-based sealer (CeraSeal) is less cytotoxic and more biocompatible than epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硅酸钙型根管封闭剂与环氧胺树脂封闭剂在人类根尖乳头干细胞中的细胞相容性和细胞迁移评估:体外研究
本研究的目的是通过阿拉玛蓝(Alamar Blue)、附录素 V-FICT 和伤口愈合试验,评估硅酸钙封孔剂(CeraSeal)和环氧树脂封孔剂(AH Plus)对人乳头顶端干细胞(hSCAPs)的细胞毒性和细胞迁移的影响。在阿拉玛蓝检测中,在所有实验期间,接触未稀释 CeraSeal 提取物的 hSCAPs 的细胞存活率都明显高于用 AH Plus 处理的细胞(p < 0.001)。流式细胞仪分析证实了对存活细胞的比较,并表明与 CeraSeal 和对照组相比,AH Plus 增加了细胞凋亡(p < 0.001)。此外,在长达 48 小时的观察中,AH Plus 的细胞迁移水平明显低于 CeraSeal 和对照组(p < 0.01)。总之,硅酸钙封闭剂(CeraSeal)比环氧树脂封闭剂(AH Plus)的细胞毒性更低,生物相容性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Endodontic Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
99
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues. The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses. The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.
期刊最新文献
Identification of oxidative stress biomarkers in apical periodontitis: A scoping review with bibliometric analysis Permanent tooth avulsions: A retrospective analysis of the demographics and aetiology of cases at a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia Micro‐computed tomography evaluation of minimally invasive root canal preparation in 3D‐printed C‐shaped canal Survival evaluation of surgical extrusion for the management of complicated crown‐root fractured maxillary incisors: A clinical study Sharing endodontic research on social media platforms: Is it effective? A 10-year timeline analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1