Teleworking during COVID-19: experiences from Saudi Arabia.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Industrial Health Pub Date : 2023-07-29 DOI:10.2486/indhealth.2022-0041
Sama'a H Almubarak, Atheer Kalid Alsaif, Salma Jamal Almulla, Asma Saud Alfayez, Heba Yaagoub Alnujaidi, Demah Mansour Alsalman
{"title":"Teleworking during COVID-19: experiences from Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Sama'a H Almubarak,&nbsp;Atheer Kalid Alsaif,&nbsp;Salma Jamal Almulla,&nbsp;Asma Saud Alfayez,&nbsp;Heba Yaagoub Alnujaidi,&nbsp;Demah Mansour Alsalman","doi":"10.2486/indhealth.2022-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teleworking has been adopted as a response to COVID-19 to reduce the spread of the infection, while continuing business operations. Saudi Arabia was among the countries that adopted stringent teleworking policies accompanying the first documented COVID-19 case. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted to explore experiences of employees towards teleworking as a mandated work setting during COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. We collected data using a questionnaire that was disseminated via different social media platforms during the partial curfew in the Country. The study sample included 471 participants. Most participants (78%) were satisfied with teleworking and reported higher job efficiency (44%) and work concentration (48%), and better work-life balance (56%) and stress management (55%). The positive experience was dependent on factors, such as gender, age, marital status, educational level, working sector and teleworking mode. Men, bachelor's degree holders, nonmarried, and employees working in health and education sectors as well as working flexible hours had less positive experience than their respective counterparts. The research contributes to literature about teleworking as a legitimate alternative work arrangement, while approaching teleworking as a means to reduce risks. As the first study conducted within Saudi Arabia, the study's findings have implications for policy, practice and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":13531,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Health","volume":"61 4","pages":"291-303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/19/b4/indhealth-61-291.PMC10398172.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2022-0041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Teleworking has been adopted as a response to COVID-19 to reduce the spread of the infection, while continuing business operations. Saudi Arabia was among the countries that adopted stringent teleworking policies accompanying the first documented COVID-19 case. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted to explore experiences of employees towards teleworking as a mandated work setting during COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. We collected data using a questionnaire that was disseminated via different social media platforms during the partial curfew in the Country. The study sample included 471 participants. Most participants (78%) were satisfied with teleworking and reported higher job efficiency (44%) and work concentration (48%), and better work-life balance (56%) and stress management (55%). The positive experience was dependent on factors, such as gender, age, marital status, educational level, working sector and teleworking mode. Men, bachelor's degree holders, nonmarried, and employees working in health and education sectors as well as working flexible hours had less positive experience than their respective counterparts. The research contributes to literature about teleworking as a legitimate alternative work arrangement, while approaching teleworking as a means to reduce risks. As the first study conducted within Saudi Arabia, the study's findings have implications for policy, practice and research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病期间远程办公:来自沙特阿拉伯的经验
作为应对COVID-19的一项措施,远程办公已被采用,以减少感染的传播,同时继续开展业务运营。沙特阿拉伯是第一例记录在案的COVID-19病例后采取严格远程办公政策的国家之一。进行了一项描述性横断面研究,以探索沙特阿拉伯员工在2019冠状病毒病期间将远程办公作为强制性工作环境的经历。我们使用问卷收集数据,该问卷在该国部分宵禁期间通过不同的社交媒体平台传播。研究样本包括471名参与者。大多数参与者(78%)对远程办公感到满意,并表示更高的工作效率(44%)和工作专注度(48%),以及更好的工作与生活平衡(56%)和压力管理(55%)。积极体验与性别、年龄、婚姻状况、教育程度、工作部门和远程工作模式等因素有关。男性、学士学位持有者、未婚以及在卫生和教育部门工作以及工作时间灵活的雇员的积极经验比他们各自的同行要少。该研究有助于将远程办公作为一种合法的替代工作安排的文献,同时将远程办公作为一种降低风险的手段。作为在沙特阿拉伯进行的第一项研究,该研究的结果对政策、实践和研究都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial Health
Industrial Health 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: INDUSTRIAL HEALTH covers all aspects of occupational medicine, ergonomics, industrial hygiene, engineering, safety and policy sciences. The journal helps promote solutions for the control and improvement of working conditions, and for the application of valuable research findings to the actual working environment.
期刊最新文献
Predicting the use of sugar and caffeine as countermeasures to sleepiness in London bus drivers. Long-term impact of being bullied at school on job satisfaction among middle-aged workers: findings from a 50-year prospective study of the 1958 British Birth Cohort. Workload management measures for supporting nuclear industry main control room operators and emergency response organization personnel during crises-a scoping review. Subsequent development of cholangiocarcinoma caused by exposure to 1,2-dichloropropane and/or dichloromethane in the printing company in Osaka, Japan. A framework for countermeasures design to support professional drivers' fitness-to-drive.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1