Integrating organizational climate theory: A domain-independent explanation for climate formation and function.

IF 9.4 1区 心理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Applied Psychology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1037/apl0001117
Jeremy M Beus, Jacob H Smith, Erik C Taylor
{"title":"Integrating organizational climate theory: A domain-independent explanation for climate formation and function.","authors":"Jeremy M Beus, Jacob H Smith, Erik C Taylor","doi":"10.1037/apl0001117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizational climate is arguably the most studied representation of the social context of organizations, having been examined as an antecedent, outcome, or boundary condition in virtually every domain of inquiry in the organizational sciences. Yet there is no commonly recognized, domain-independent theory that is used to explain why and how climates both form and affect behavior. Rather, there is a set of climate theories (and literatures) housed across a variety of divergent content domains. As a result, researchers who study climate in one domain are often unaware of climate advancements made in another. This lack of a theoretical lingua franca for climate limits our ability to understand what is known about climate and how climate research-whether domain-specific or domain-independent-can progress in a more cogent fashion. To resolve these fractures and unify climate scholarship, this article integrates existing theoretical perspectives of climate into a singular climate theory that summarizes and articulates domain-independent answers to the questions of why and how climates form and influence behavior in organizations. Using the individual drive to reduce uncertainty in meaningful social settings as the motivational mortar for this theoretical integration, we offer a needed reorientation to the field and illuminate a path forward for both future domain-specific and domain-independent climate advancements. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"2018-2039"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizational climate is arguably the most studied representation of the social context of organizations, having been examined as an antecedent, outcome, or boundary condition in virtually every domain of inquiry in the organizational sciences. Yet there is no commonly recognized, domain-independent theory that is used to explain why and how climates both form and affect behavior. Rather, there is a set of climate theories (and literatures) housed across a variety of divergent content domains. As a result, researchers who study climate in one domain are often unaware of climate advancements made in another. This lack of a theoretical lingua franca for climate limits our ability to understand what is known about climate and how climate research-whether domain-specific or domain-independent-can progress in a more cogent fashion. To resolve these fractures and unify climate scholarship, this article integrates existing theoretical perspectives of climate into a singular climate theory that summarizes and articulates domain-independent answers to the questions of why and how climates form and influence behavior in organizations. Using the individual drive to reduce uncertainty in meaningful social settings as the motivational mortar for this theoretical integration, we offer a needed reorientation to the field and illuminate a path forward for both future domain-specific and domain-independent climate advancements. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合组织气候理论:气候形成与功能的领域独立解释。
可以说,组织气候是组织社会背景的最被研究的表现,在组织科学的几乎每个调查领域都被作为先决条件、结果或边界条件进行了研究。然而,目前还没有一个公认的、独立于领域的理论来解释气候形成和影响行为的原因和方式。相反,有一套气候理论(和文献)分布在各种不同的内容领域。因此,在一个领域研究气候的研究人员往往不知道在另一个领域取得的气候进展。缺乏气候的理论通用语限制了我们了解气候的能力,也限制了气候研究——无论是特定领域还是独立领域——如何以更有说服力的方式取得进展。为了解决这些分歧并统一气候学术,本文将现有的气候理论观点整合到一个单一的气候理论中,该理论总结并阐明了气候为什么以及如何形成和影响组织行为的问题的独立于领域的答案。利用个体驱动力来减少有意义的社会环境中的不确定性,作为理论整合的动机砂浆,我们为该领域提供了必要的重新定位,并为未来特定领域和独立领域的气候进步指明了前进的道路。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Psychology® focuses on publishing original investigations that contribute new knowledge and understanding to fields of applied psychology (excluding clinical and applied experimental or human factors, which are better suited for other APA journals). The journal primarily considers empirical and theoretical investigations that enhance understanding of cognitive, motivational, affective, and behavioral psychological phenomena in work and organizational settings. These phenomena can occur at individual, group, organizational, or cultural levels, and in various work settings such as business, education, training, health, service, government, or military institutions. The journal welcomes submissions from both public and private sector organizations, for-profit or nonprofit. It publishes several types of articles, including: 1.Rigorously conducted empirical investigations that expand conceptual understanding (original investigations or meta-analyses). 2.Theory development articles and integrative conceptual reviews that synthesize literature and generate new theories on psychological phenomena to stimulate novel research. 3.Rigorously conducted qualitative research on phenomena that are challenging to capture with quantitative methods or require inductive theory building.
期刊最新文献
Prospects for reducing group mean differences on cognitive tests via item selection strategies. Self-promotion in entrepreneurship: A driver for proactive adaptation. Coping with work-nonwork stressors over time: A person-centered, multistudy integration of coping breadth and depth. A person-centered approach to behaving badly at work: An examination of workplace deviance patterns. How perceived lack of benevolence harms trust of artificial intelligence management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1