Racial/Ethnic and Nativity Inequalities in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The Role of Psychosocial Stressors

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2023.06.007
Kristin Erbetta PhD, MPH, MSW , Joanna Almeida ScD, MPH, MSW, Kristie A. Thomas PhD, MSW
{"title":"Racial/Ethnic and Nativity Inequalities in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The Role of Psychosocial Stressors","authors":"Kristin Erbetta PhD, MPH, MSW ,&nbsp;Joanna Almeida ScD, MPH, MSW,&nbsp;Kristie A. Thomas PhD, MSW","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Racial/ethnic and nativity disparities in </span>gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) persist in the United States. Identified factors associated with these differences do not fully explain them. Research has recognized psychosocial stress as a potentially modifiable risk factor for GDM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We used New York City Pregnancy Risk and Assessment Monitoring System data (2009–2014) linked with birth certificate items (</span><em>n</em> = 7,632) in bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine associations between 12 psychosocial stressors (modeled three ways: individual stressors, grouped stressors, stress constructs) and GDM across race/ethnicity and nativity, and if stressors explain racial/ethnic/nativity differences in GDM.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>U.S. and foreign-born Black and Hispanic women reported higher stressors relative to U.S.-born White women. In fully adjusted models, the financial stress construct was associated with a 51% increased adjusted risk of GDM, and adding all stressors doubled the risk. Psychosocial stressors did not explain the elevated risk of GDM among foreign-born Black (adjusted risk ratio, 2.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.53–3.11), Hispanic (adjusted risk ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.10–2.25), or Asian/Pacific Islander (adjusted risk ratio, 4.10; 95% confidence interval, 3.04–5.52) women compared with U.S.-born White women.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Historically minoritized racial/ethnic and immigrant women have an increased risk of psychosocial stressors and GDM relative to U.S.-born White women. Although financial and all stressors predicted higher risk of GDM, they did not explain the increased risk of GDM among immigrant women and women from minoritized racial/ethnic groups. Further examination into racial/ethnic and nativity inequalities in stress exposure and rates of GDM is warranted to promote healthier pregnancies and birth outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723001275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Racial/ethnic and nativity disparities in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) persist in the United States. Identified factors associated with these differences do not fully explain them. Research has recognized psychosocial stress as a potentially modifiable risk factor for GDM.

Methods

We used New York City Pregnancy Risk and Assessment Monitoring System data (2009–2014) linked with birth certificate items (n = 7,632) in bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine associations between 12 psychosocial stressors (modeled three ways: individual stressors, grouped stressors, stress constructs) and GDM across race/ethnicity and nativity, and if stressors explain racial/ethnic/nativity differences in GDM.

Results

U.S. and foreign-born Black and Hispanic women reported higher stressors relative to U.S.-born White women. In fully adjusted models, the financial stress construct was associated with a 51% increased adjusted risk of GDM, and adding all stressors doubled the risk. Psychosocial stressors did not explain the elevated risk of GDM among foreign-born Black (adjusted risk ratio, 2.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.53–3.11), Hispanic (adjusted risk ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.10–2.25), or Asian/Pacific Islander (adjusted risk ratio, 4.10; 95% confidence interval, 3.04–5.52) women compared with U.S.-born White women.

Conclusions

Historically minoritized racial/ethnic and immigrant women have an increased risk of psychosocial stressors and GDM relative to U.S.-born White women. Although financial and all stressors predicted higher risk of GDM, they did not explain the increased risk of GDM among immigrant women and women from minoritized racial/ethnic groups. Further examination into racial/ethnic and nativity inequalities in stress exposure and rates of GDM is warranted to promote healthier pregnancies and birth outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族/民族和出生不平等在妊娠糖尿病:社会心理应激源的作用。
在美国,妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的种族/民族和出生差异持续存在。与这些差异相关的已确定因素并不能完全解释这些差异。研究已经认识到心理社会压力是GDM的一个潜在的可改变的危险因素。方法:我们使用纽约市妊娠风险和评估监测系统数据(2009-2014年)与出生证明项目(n = 7632)进行双变量和多变量分析,以检验12种社会心理压力源(以三种方式建模:个体压力源、分组压力源、压力结构)与GDM在种族/民族和出生地之间的关系,以及压力源是否解释了GDM的种族/民族/出生地差异。结果:美国和外国出生的黑人和西班牙裔女性报告的压力源高于美国出生的白人女性。在完全调整的模型中,金融压力结构与GDM调整风险增加51%相关,并且添加所有压力源使风险增加一倍。心理社会压力因素不能解释外国出生的黑人患GDM的风险升高(调整后的风险比,2.18;95%可信区间,1.53-3.11),西班牙裔(调整风险比,1.57;95%可信区间,1.10-2.25),或亚洲/太平洋岛民(调整后的风险比,4.10;95%可信区间(3.04-5.52),与美国出生的白人女性相比。结论:与美国出生的白人女性相比,历史上少数种族/民族和移民女性患心理社会压力源和GDM的风险更高。尽管经济和所有压力因素预测GDM的风险更高,但它们并不能解释移民妇女和少数种族/民族妇女GDM风险的增加。为了促进更健康的怀孕和分娩结果,有必要进一步研究种族/民族和出生地在压力暴露和GDM发生率方面的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
A Mixed Methods Longitudinal Investigation of Maternal Depression Across the Perinatal Period Among Mothers Who Gave Birth During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring Consumer Preferences for Pharmacy Provision of Mifepristone in the Human-centered Design Discovery Phase. "Women's Lives Are on the Line, and Our Hands Are Tied": How Television Is Reckoning With a Post-Dobbs America. Women's Health Care Delivery and Coordination After Transitioning From One Electronic Health Record to Another: Perspectives From Staff in the Veterans Health Administration. Protective Factors Associated With Lower Likelihood of Injection Drug Use and Experiencing Overdose Among Incarcerated Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1