Influence of exercise intensity and hypoxic exposure on physiological, perceptual and biomechanical responses to treadmill running

Chris Chow Li Tee, Mee Chee Chong, Viswanath Sundar, Chuen Leang Chok, Mohd Rizal Md Razali, Wee Kian Yeo, Olivier Girard
{"title":"Influence of exercise intensity and hypoxic exposure on physiological, perceptual and biomechanical responses to treadmill running","authors":"Chris Chow Li Tee,&nbsp;Mee Chee Chong,&nbsp;Viswanath Sundar,&nbsp;Chuen Leang Chok,&nbsp;Mohd Rizal Md Razali,&nbsp;Wee Kian Yeo,&nbsp;Olivier Girard","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2022.2109066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Acute physiological, perceptual and biomechanical consequences of manipulating both exercise intensity and hypoxic exposure during treadmill running were determined. On separate days, eleven trained individuals ran for 45 s (separated by 135 s of rest) on an instrumented treadmill at seven running speeds (8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 km.h<sup>−1</sup>) in normoxia (NM, FiO<sub>2</sub> = 20.9%), moderate hypoxia (MH, FiO<sub>2</sub> = 16.1%), high hypoxia (HH, FiO<sub>2</sub> = 14.1%) and severe hypoxia (SH, FiO<sub>2</sub> = 13.0%). Running mechanics were collected over 20 consecutive steps (i.e. after running ∼25 s), with concurrent assessment of physiological (heart rate and arterial oxygen saturation) and perceptual (overall perceived discomfort, difficulty breathing and leg discomfort) responses. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (seven speeds × four conditions) were used. There was a speed × condition interaction for heart rate (<i>p</i> = 0.045, ηp<sup>2 </sup>=<sup> </sup>0.22), with lower values in NM, MH and HH compared to SH at 8 km.h<sup>−1</sup> (125 ± 12, 125 ± 11, 128 ± 12 vs 132 ± 10 b.min<sup>−1</sup>). Overall perceived discomfort (8 and 16 km.h<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.019 and <i>p</i> = 0.007, ηp<sup>2  </sup>= 0.21, respectively) and perceived difficulty breathing (all speeds; <i>p</i> = 0.023, ηp<sup>2  </sup>= 0.37) were greater in SH compared to MH, whereas leg discomfort was not influenced by hypoxic exposure. Minimal difference was observed in the twelve kinetics/kinematics variables with hypoxia (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.122; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2 </sup>= 0.19). Running at slower speeds in combination with severe hypoxia elevates physiological and perceptual responses without a corresponding increase in ground reaction forces.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"23 8","pages":"1581-1590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/17461391.2022.2109066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/17461391.2022.2109066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute physiological, perceptual and biomechanical consequences of manipulating both exercise intensity and hypoxic exposure during treadmill running were determined. On separate days, eleven trained individuals ran for 45 s (separated by 135 s of rest) on an instrumented treadmill at seven running speeds (8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 km.h−1) in normoxia (NM, FiO2 = 20.9%), moderate hypoxia (MH, FiO2 = 16.1%), high hypoxia (HH, FiO2 = 14.1%) and severe hypoxia (SH, FiO2 = 13.0%). Running mechanics were collected over 20 consecutive steps (i.e. after running ∼25 s), with concurrent assessment of physiological (heart rate and arterial oxygen saturation) and perceptual (overall perceived discomfort, difficulty breathing and leg discomfort) responses. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (seven speeds × four conditions) were used. There was a speed × condition interaction for heart rate (p = 0.045, ηp2 =0.22), with lower values in NM, MH and HH compared to SH at 8 km.h−1 (125 ± 12, 125 ± 11, 128 ± 12 vs 132 ± 10 b.min−1). Overall perceived discomfort (8 and 16 km.h−1; p = 0.019 and p = 0.007, ηp2  = 0.21, respectively) and perceived difficulty breathing (all speeds; p = 0.023, ηp2  = 0.37) were greater in SH compared to MH, whereas leg discomfort was not influenced by hypoxic exposure. Minimal difference was observed in the twelve kinetics/kinematics variables with hypoxia (p > 0.122; ηp2 = 0.19). Running at slower speeds in combination with severe hypoxia elevates physiological and perceptual responses without a corresponding increase in ground reaction forces.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动强度和低氧暴露对跑步机跑步的生理、知觉和生物力学反应的影响
在跑步机上操控运动强度和低氧暴露的急性生理、知觉和生物力学后果被确定。在不同的天,11名被训练者在仪器跑步机上以7种跑步速度(8、10、12、14、16、18和20 km.h−1)在常氧(NM, FiO2 = 20.9%)、中度缺氧(MH, FiO2 = 16.1%)、高氧(HH, FiO2 = 14.1%)和重度缺氧(SH, FiO2 = 13.0%)下跑步45 s(中间休息135 s)。在连续20步(即跑步后~ 25秒)中收集跑步力学,同时评估生理(心率和动脉血氧饱和度)和知觉(总体感知不适、呼吸困难和腿部不适)反应。采用双向重复测量方差分析(7速× 4工况)。心率存在速度与条件的交互作用(p = 0.045, ηp2 = 0.22), 8 km.h−1时,NM、MH和HH值低于SH(125±12,125±11,128±12 vs 132±10 b.m min−1)。总体感觉不适(8和16 km.h−1;P = 0.019和P = 0.007, η P = 0.21)和感知呼吸困难(所有速度;p = 0.023, ηp = 0.37),而腿部不适不受缺氧暴露的影响。缺氧时12个动力学/运动学变量的差异极小(p > 0.122;ηp2 = 0.19)。以较慢的速度跑步与严重缺氧相结合会提高生理和感知反应,而不会相应增加地面反作用力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Association Between Early Sport Specialization and Injury and Career Outcomes Among National Football League Athletes. Performance Analysis of 200 m Qualifying Time Trial: Gear Ratios, Velocity Patterns, and Acceleration Strategies. Acute Hypoxia Decreases Maximum Fat Oxidation Rate During Step Incremental Exercise Normalized to Respiratory Compensation Point Issue Information Associations of Domain-Specific Physical Activity With Mental Health Symptoms Among Finnish Employed Adults: A Population-Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1