Alveolar bone loss and root resorption in mesialized second molars in mandibular first molar extraction cases as compared to contralateral non-extraction side in young adults: A retrospective cross-sectional study

Abstract

Introduction

The alveolar bone loss (ABL) and external apical root resorption (EARR) depict the safety of mesialization of mandibular second molars into the extraction space of mandibular first molars. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ABL and EARR after closure of mandibular first molar extraction space by mesialization of second molar on extraction side (ES) as compared to the contralateral non-extraction side (NES).

Material and methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out using the pre and posttreatment orthodontic records of young adults with complete set of permanent dentitions treated with extraction of unilateral mandibular first molar and non-extraction treatment on the contralateral side. All patients underwent mini-implant supported mesialization of second molar on ES. The ABL and EARR of second molar on ES and contralateral NES were measured on digital orthopantomograms. The ABL and EARR of second molars on ES and contralateral NES were compared using independent sample t-test.

Results

A total of 36 subjects (14 males and 22 females) were included in the study. The mean treatment duration for molar mesialization was 28.75 ± 8.05 months. The mean crown and root movements of mandibular second molar on ES were 10.94 ± 1.25 mm and 9.04 mm ± 1.14 mm, as compared to 0.91 ± 1.01 mm and 0.77 ± 0.83 mm on contralateral NES, respectively. The mean ABL and EARR at mandibular second molar were found to be significantly greater on the ES than the contralateral NES (P < 0.001 and < 0.05, respectively). A total of seven patients (19.4%) experienced ABL ≥ 1 mm on ES as compared to none in the contralateral NES. EARR of > 2 mm of at least one root was found in seven patients (19.4%) in ES as compared to four (11%) in contralateral NES.

Conclusion

There was small but statistically significant difference in the ABL and EARR of mesialized mandibular second molar at first molar ES as compared to the contralateral NES. For majority of patients this difference was small but few isolated cases experienced severe ABL and EARR.