Accessible autonomous transportation and services: a focus group study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2023.2242898
Sivashankar Sivakanthan, Rosemarie Cooper, Celia Lopes, Hailee Kulich, Nikitha Deepak, Chang Dae Lee, Hongwu Wang, Jorge L Candiotti, Brad E Dicianno, Alicia Koontz, Rory A Cooper
{"title":"Accessible autonomous transportation and services: a focus group study.","authors":"Sivashankar Sivakanthan, Rosemarie Cooper, Celia Lopes, Hailee Kulich, Nikitha Deepak, Chang Dae Lee, Hongwu Wang, Jorge L Candiotti, Brad E Dicianno, Alicia Koontz, Rory A Cooper","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2023.2242898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Existing automated vehicle transportation guidelines and regulations have minimal guidance to address the specific needs of people with disabilities. Accessibility should be at the forefront to increase autonomy and independence for people with disabilities. The purpose of this research is to better understand potential facilitators and barriers to using accessible autonomous transportation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Focus groups were conducted with key stakeholders derived from people with disabilities (<i>n</i> = 5), travel companions/caregivers (<i>n</i> = 5), and transportation experts or designers (<i>n</i> = 11).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The themes include describing stakeholder perceptions across all three groups by identified themes: autonomous vehicle assistive technology, autonomy vs automation, cost, infrastructure, safety & liability, design challenges, and potential impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Specific gaps and needs were identified regarding barriers and facilitators for transportation accessibility and evidence-based guidance. These specific gaps can help to formulate design criteria for the communication between, the interior and exterior of accessible autonomous vehicles.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2242898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Existing automated vehicle transportation guidelines and regulations have minimal guidance to address the specific needs of people with disabilities. Accessibility should be at the forefront to increase autonomy and independence for people with disabilities. The purpose of this research is to better understand potential facilitators and barriers to using accessible autonomous transportation.

Methods: Focus groups were conducted with key stakeholders derived from people with disabilities (n = 5), travel companions/caregivers (n = 5), and transportation experts or designers (n = 11).

Results: The themes include describing stakeholder perceptions across all three groups by identified themes: autonomous vehicle assistive technology, autonomy vs automation, cost, infrastructure, safety & liability, design challenges, and potential impact.

Conclusion: Specific gaps and needs were identified regarding barriers and facilitators for transportation accessibility and evidence-based guidance. These specific gaps can help to formulate design criteria for the communication between, the interior and exterior of accessible autonomous vehicles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无障碍自主交通和服务:焦点小组研究。
目的:现有的自动驾驶汽车交通指南和法规在满足残疾人特殊需求方面的指导极少。要提高残疾人的自主性和独立性,无障碍性应放在首位。本研究旨在更好地了解使用无障碍自动驾驶交通的潜在促进因素和障碍:与主要利益相关者进行了焦点小组讨论,这些利益相关者包括残疾人(5 人)、旅行陪伴者/照顾者(5 人)以及交通专家或设计师(11 人):结果:主题包括描述所有三组利益相关者的看法,确定的主题有:自动驾驶汽车辅助技术、自主性与自动化、成本、基础设施、安全与责任、设计挑战以及潜在影响:结论:在交通无障碍和循证指导的障碍和促进因素方面,发现了具体的差距和需求。这些具体差距有助于制定无障碍自动驾驶汽车内部和外部之间的沟通设计标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Skills on wheels: caregiver perspectives on the design and long-term impact of a pediatric wheelchair Skills training program. Outcome measurement of cognitive impairment and dementia in serious digital games: a scoping review. Evaluating multi-channel interaction design for enhancing Pose accuracy in yoga training among visually impaired individuals. Validity of a wrist-worn consumer-grade wearable for estimating energy expenditure, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity in manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. How does moderate upper limb activity modify sitting forces for able-bodied persons and wheelchair users?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1