Hospital COVID-19 preparedness: Are (were) we ready?

Mei Zhao, Hanadi Y Hamadi, D Rob Haley, Jing Xu, Ajani Aj Dunn, Aaron Spaulding
{"title":"Hospital COVID-19 preparedness: Are (were) we ready?","authors":"Mei Zhao,&nbsp;Hanadi Y Hamadi,&nbsp;D Rob Haley,&nbsp;Jing Xu,&nbsp;Ajani Aj Dunn,&nbsp;Aaron Spaulding","doi":"10.5055/ajdm.2022.0449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Terrorist attacks and natural disasters such as Hurricanes Katrina and Harvey have increased focus on disaster preparedness planning. Despite the attention on planning, many studies have found that hospitals in the United States are underprepared to manage extended disasters appropriately and the surge in patient volume it might bring.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to profile and examine the availability of hospital capacity specifically related to COVID-19 patients, such as emergency department (ED) beds, intensive care unit (ICU) beds, temporary space setup, and ventilators.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional retrospective study design was used to examine secondary data from the 2020 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey. A series of multivariate logistic analyses were conducted to investigate the strength of association between changes in ED beds, ICU beds, staffed beds, and temporary spaces setup, and the 3,655 hospitals' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results highlight that the odds of a change in ED beds are 44 percent lower for government hospitals and 54 percent for for-profit hospitals than not-for-profit hospitals. The odds of ED bed change for nonteaching hospitals were 34 percent lower compared to teaching hospitals. Small and medium hospitals have significantly lower odds (75 and 51 percent, respectively) than large hospitals. For ICU bed change, staffed bed change, and temporary spaces setup, the conclusions were consistently significant regarding the impact of hospital ownership, teaching status, and hospital size. However, temporary spaces setup differs by hospital location. The odds of change is significantly lower (OR = 0.71) in urban hospitals compared with rural hospitals, while for ED beds, the odds of change is considerably higher (OR = 1.57) in urban hospitals compared to rural hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need for policymakers to consider not only resource limitations that were created from supply line disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic but also a more global assessment of the adequacy of funding and support for insurance coverage, hospital finance, and how hospitals meet the needs of the populations they serve.</p>","PeriodicalId":40040,"journal":{"name":"American journal of disaster medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of disaster medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2022.0449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Terrorist attacks and natural disasters such as Hurricanes Katrina and Harvey have increased focus on disaster preparedness planning. Despite the attention on planning, many studies have found that hospitals in the United States are underprepared to manage extended disasters appropriately and the surge in patient volume it might bring.

Aim: This study aims to profile and examine the availability of hospital capacity specifically related to COVID-19 patients, such as emergency department (ED) beds, intensive care unit (ICU) beds, temporary space setup, and ventilators.

Method: A cross-sectional retrospective study design was used to examine secondary data from the 2020 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey. A series of multivariate logistic analyses were conducted to investigate the strength of association between changes in ED beds, ICU beds, staffed beds, and temporary spaces setup, and the 3,655 hospitals' characteristics.

Results: Our results highlight that the odds of a change in ED beds are 44 percent lower for government hospitals and 54 percent for for-profit hospitals than not-for-profit hospitals. The odds of ED bed change for nonteaching hospitals were 34 percent lower compared to teaching hospitals. Small and medium hospitals have significantly lower odds (75 and 51 percent, respectively) than large hospitals. For ICU bed change, staffed bed change, and temporary spaces setup, the conclusions were consistently significant regarding the impact of hospital ownership, teaching status, and hospital size. However, temporary spaces setup differs by hospital location. The odds of change is significantly lower (OR = 0.71) in urban hospitals compared with rural hospitals, while for ED beds, the odds of change is considerably higher (OR = 1.57) in urban hospitals compared to rural hospitals.

Conclusion: There is a need for policymakers to consider not only resource limitations that were created from supply line disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic but also a more global assessment of the adequacy of funding and support for insurance coverage, hospital finance, and how hospitals meet the needs of the populations they serve.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院COVID-19防范:我们准备好了吗?
背景:恐怖袭击和卡特里娜飓风和哈维飓风等自然灾害使人们更加重视备灾规划。尽管重视规划,但许多研究发现,美国的医院在适当管理长期灾难和可能带来的病人数量激增方面准备不足。目的:本研究旨在分析和检查与COVID-19患者专门相关的医院容量的可用性,例如急诊科(ED)床位、重症监护病房(ICU)床位、临时空间设置和呼吸机。方法:采用横断面回顾性研究设计,检查2020年美国医院协会(AHA)年度调查的次要数据。我们进行了一系列多变量logistic分析,以调查急诊科床位、ICU床位、人员床位和临时床位设置的变化与3,655家医院特征之间的关联强度。结果:我们的研究结果强调,与非营利性医院相比,公立医院和营利性医院的急诊科床位变化的几率分别低44%和54%。非教学医院的急诊科床位更换几率比教学医院低34%。中小型医院的患病几率(分别为75%和51%)明显低于大型医院。对于ICU床位变更、人员床位变更和临时空间设置,结论在医院所有权、教学状况和医院规模的影响方面一致显着。然而,临时空间的设置因医院的位置而异。与农村医院相比,城市医院急诊科床位的变化几率显著降低(OR = 0.71),而在急诊科床位方面,城市医院急诊科床位的变化几率显著高于农村医院(OR = 1.57)。结论:政策制定者不仅需要考虑COVID-19大流行期间供应线中断造成的资源限制,还需要对保险覆盖、医院财务的资金和支持是否充足以及医院如何满足其服务人群的需求进行更全面的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of disaster medicine
American journal of disaster medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: With the publication of the American Journal of Disaster Medicine, for the first time, comes real guidance in this new medical specialty from the country"s foremost experts in areas most physicians and medical professionals have never seen…a deadly cocktail of catastrophic events like blast wounds and post explosion injuries, biological weapons contamination and mass physical and psychological trauma that comes in the wake of natural disasters and disease outbreak. The journal has one goal: to provide physicians and medical professionals the essential informational tools they need as they seek to combine emergency medical and trauma skills with crisis management and new forms of triage.
期刊最新文献
Protection enhancement strategies of potential outbreaks during Hajj. Perceptions regarding second wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among Indian adults: A cross-sectional study. Agile response to critical need for clinical trial accessibility during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave. Pediatric disaster preparedness curriculum across emergency medicine residencies. Advanced Surgical Skills for Exposure in Trauma (ASSET) course improves military surgeon confidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1