Examining between- and within-person effects of the self-stigma of seeking psychological help on the therapeutic working alliance: The moderating role of psychological distress.

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-23 DOI:10.1037/pst0000482
Andrew J Seidman, David L Vogel, Daniel G Lannin
{"title":"Examining between- and within-person effects of the self-stigma of seeking psychological help on the therapeutic working alliance: The moderating role of psychological distress.","authors":"Andrew J Seidman, David L Vogel, Daniel G Lannin","doi":"10.1037/pst0000482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The self-stigma (i.e., shame) associated with psychotherapy is a prominent barrier to seeking psychological help, but less is known about its effects after treatment begins. Evidence suggests that self-stigma may interfere with the formation of the therapeutic alliance, but no studies have examined this throughout the course of psychotherapy. Self-stigma's erosion of the alliance may be most pronounced when clients experience heightened psychological distress, but this also has not been examined. Therefore, the present study addresses these omissions among 37 clients who completed at least three therapy sessions for research credit. Participants completed measures of self-stigma and past-week symptoms of distress before each session and ratings of the working alliance after. Predictor variables were disaggregated into between-person (time-invariant or average levels) and within-person (time-variant or session-by-session changes) components to enable investigation of for whom (and under what conditions) self-stigma was associated with the therapeutic alliance. Results indicated that higher levels of self-stigma (between and within persons) predicted a worse alliance. When examined as an interaction effect alongside distress in a multilevel moderation model, higher between-person ratings of self-stigma predicted a weaker therapist-client alliance across levels (<i>M</i> ± 1 <i>SD</i>) of within-person distress. Notably, its effects became more pronounced as symptoms of distress increased, indicating a period in which clients are simultaneously most likely to need help yet least likely to feel allied with their therapist. Findings highlight the importance for therapists to simultaneously monitor and consider both average and session-by-session fluctuations in self-stigma and distress to develop and maintain the working alliance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":"60 2","pages":"206-211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The self-stigma (i.e., shame) associated with psychotherapy is a prominent barrier to seeking psychological help, but less is known about its effects after treatment begins. Evidence suggests that self-stigma may interfere with the formation of the therapeutic alliance, but no studies have examined this throughout the course of psychotherapy. Self-stigma's erosion of the alliance may be most pronounced when clients experience heightened psychological distress, but this also has not been examined. Therefore, the present study addresses these omissions among 37 clients who completed at least three therapy sessions for research credit. Participants completed measures of self-stigma and past-week symptoms of distress before each session and ratings of the working alliance after. Predictor variables were disaggregated into between-person (time-invariant or average levels) and within-person (time-variant or session-by-session changes) components to enable investigation of for whom (and under what conditions) self-stigma was associated with the therapeutic alliance. Results indicated that higher levels of self-stigma (between and within persons) predicted a worse alliance. When examined as an interaction effect alongside distress in a multilevel moderation model, higher between-person ratings of self-stigma predicted a weaker therapist-client alliance across levels (M ± 1 SD) of within-person distress. Notably, its effects became more pronounced as symptoms of distress increased, indicating a period in which clients are simultaneously most likely to need help yet least likely to feel allied with their therapist. Findings highlight the importance for therapists to simultaneously monitor and consider both average and session-by-session fluctuations in self-stigma and distress to develop and maintain the working alliance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究寻求心理帮助的自我污名对治疗工作联盟的人际和人内影响:心理困扰的调节作用。
与心理治疗相关的自我污名(即羞耻感)是寻求心理帮助的一个突出障碍,但人们对其在治疗开始后的影响却知之甚少。有证据表明,自我烙印可能会干扰治疗联盟的形成,但还没有研究对整个心理治疗过程进行考察。自我烙印对治疗联盟的侵蚀可能在求助者经历更严重的心理困扰时最为明显,但这一点也没有进行过研究。因此,本研究针对 37 名至少完成了三次治疗以获得研究学分的求助者进行了研究。参与者在每次治疗前完成了自我污名和过去一周痛苦症状的测量,并在治疗后完成了对工作联盟的评分。预测变量被分解为人与人之间(时间不变或平均水平)和人与人之间(时间不变或每次治疗的变化)两个部分,以便研究自我污名与治疗联盟的关联对象(以及在什么条件下)。结果表明,自我污名水平越高(人与人之间和人与人之间),预示着治疗联盟越差。在多层次调节模型中,如果将自我污名作为与困扰的交互效应进行研究,那么在不同的人内困扰水平(M ± 1 SD)下,人与人之间较高的自我污名评级预示着治疗师与患者之间较弱的联盟关系。值得注意的是,自我烙印的影响随着困扰症状的增加而变得更加明显,这表明在这一时期,求助者最有可能需要帮助,但同时又最不可能与治疗师结盟。研究结果凸显了治疗师同时监测和考虑自我污名和痛苦的平均波动和逐次波动以发展和维持工作联盟的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
期刊最新文献
A cultural adaptation of acceptance and commitment therapy with exercise for older Chinese with chronic pain and depressive symptoms: A mixed-methods study. Toward a liberatory counseling and psychotherapy theories pedagogy and curriculum. Increasing outcome measurement precision: Network analysis of items on the Outcome Questionnaire-45. Physiological regulation processes differentiate the experience of ruptures between patient and therapist. Questioning the status quo: Latino community members as researchers in the study of health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1