Retrospective evaluation of dexmedetomidine dosing in a cohort of neurologically injured obese critically ill patients.

Harrison He, Sara A Atyia, Keaton S Smetana, Casey C May
{"title":"Retrospective evaluation of dexmedetomidine dosing in a cohort of neurologically injured obese critically ill patients.","authors":"Harrison He,&nbsp;Sara A Atyia,&nbsp;Keaton S Smetana,&nbsp;Casey C May","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_74_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dexmedetomidine is used in neurocritical care units (NCCUs) due to the light, dose-dependent sedation, and anxiolysis provided. It is unknown how to dose dexmedetomidine in obese patients. The primary objective is to assess the ability to achieve the goal Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) measurements in obese patients with a neurological injury who are solely on dexmedetomidine before and after an institutional dosing change from actual body weight (ABW) to adjusted body weight (AdjBW).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients admitted to the NCCU with a neurological condition, required dexmedetomidine for at least 8 h as a sole sedative, and weighed ≥120% of ideal body weight. Percentage of RASS measurements within the goal range (-1 to +1) during the first 48 h while on dexmedetomidine were compared between patients dosed on ABW and on AdjBW.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight patients in the ABW cohort and 72 patients in the AdjBW cohort were included. There were no statistical differences between the two groups (ABW vs. AdjBW) in the percent of RASS measurements in the goal range (53.2% ± 34.8% vs. 55% ± 37%; <i>P</i> = 0.78), mean weight (99.2 ± 26 vs. 96.8 ± 20.9 kg; <i>P</i> = 0.55), or the average dose of dexmedetomidine required to achieve first goal RASS score (0.4 ± 0.3 vs. 0.4 ± 0.3 mcg/kg/h; <i>P</i> = 0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dosing dexmedetomidine using AdjBW in obese critically ill neurologically injured patients for ongoing sedation resulted in no statistical difference in the percent of RASS measurements within the goal when compared to ABW dosing. Further studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"13 2","pages":"48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401559/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_74_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Dexmedetomidine is used in neurocritical care units (NCCUs) due to the light, dose-dependent sedation, and anxiolysis provided. It is unknown how to dose dexmedetomidine in obese patients. The primary objective is to assess the ability to achieve the goal Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) measurements in obese patients with a neurological injury who are solely on dexmedetomidine before and after an institutional dosing change from actual body weight (ABW) to adjusted body weight (AdjBW).

Methods: This study included patients admitted to the NCCU with a neurological condition, required dexmedetomidine for at least 8 h as a sole sedative, and weighed ≥120% of ideal body weight. Percentage of RASS measurements within the goal range (-1 to +1) during the first 48 h while on dexmedetomidine were compared between patients dosed on ABW and on AdjBW.

Results: Sixty-eight patients in the ABW cohort and 72 patients in the AdjBW cohort were included. There were no statistical differences between the two groups (ABW vs. AdjBW) in the percent of RASS measurements in the goal range (53.2% ± 34.8% vs. 55% ± 37%; P = 0.78), mean weight (99.2 ± 26 vs. 96.8 ± 20.9 kg; P = 0.55), or the average dose of dexmedetomidine required to achieve first goal RASS score (0.4 ± 0.3 vs. 0.4 ± 0.3 mcg/kg/h; P = 0.98).

Conclusions: Dosing dexmedetomidine using AdjBW in obese critically ill neurologically injured patients for ongoing sedation resulted in no statistical difference in the percent of RASS measurements within the goal when compared to ABW dosing. Further studies are warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经损伤肥胖危重患者队列中右美托咪定给药的回顾性评价。
背景:右美托咪定用于神经重症监护室(NCCU),因为它具有光照、剂量依赖性镇静和抗焦虑作用。目前尚不清楚如何给肥胖患者服用右美托咪定。主要目的是评估在从实际体重(ABW)到调整体重(AdjBW)的机构给药前后仅服用右美托咪定的患有神经损伤的肥胖患者实现Richmond激动镇静量表(RASS)测量目标的能力,需要右美托咪定作为唯一的镇静剂至少8小时,体重≥理想体重的120%。比较服用ABW和AdjBW的患者在服用右美托咪定的前48小时内RASS测量值在目标范围(-1至+1)内的百分比。结果:包括ABW队列中的68名患者和AdjBW队列中的72名患者。两组(ABW与AdjBW)在目标范围内的RASS测量百分比(53.2%±34.8%与55%±37%;P=0.78)、平均体重(99.2±26与96.8±20.9kg;P=0.55)、,或达到第一个目标RASS评分所需的右美托咪定的平均剂量(0.4±0.3 vs.0.4±0.3 mcg/kg/h;P=0.098)。需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
The efficacy and safety of herbal medicine BHH10 in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: study protocol for a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
IF 2.5 ACS Applied Bio MaterialsPub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2854-6
Yeeun Cho, Seunghoon Lee, Jihye Kim, Jung Won Kang, Yong-Hyeon Baek, Byung-Kwan Seo, Jae-Dong Lee
Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Herbal Formula Granules in Treating Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3: A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.
IF 0 4区 医学Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative MedicinePub Date : 2020-10-21 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4073901
Jing Zhao, Wei Sun, Jihong Chen, Zhuxing Sun, Dai Chen, Chunhua Cao, Min Yang, Jipei Ma, Ling Wang, Changying Xing, Yan Chen, Meixiao Sheng, Enchao Zhou, Lingdong Xu, Kun Gao, Lihua Liu, Qiong Liu, Lan Yi, Weiming He, Yuanyuan Zhu
Efficacy and Safety of Ganduqing Granules in Treating the Common Cold: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
IF 0 4区 医学Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative MedicinePub Date : 2022-06-09 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5105503
Yilan Wang, Piao Zhou, Yuxiao Wu, Huaqin Cao, Wenfeng Hao, Fei Wang, Jing Guo
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
期刊最新文献
Correlation of urinary glutathione S-transferase with serum creatinine in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: A prospective and observational study. Critical care nurses' knowledge and perceived barriers regarding pressure injury prevention among critically ill patients at Baghdad teaching hospitals: A cross-sectional survey. Evaluation of a novel serum marker, interleukin 27, in comparison to procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis in a tertiary care center in north India. Incidence of bradycardia with the use of remdesivir for coronavirus disease of 2019 and risk factor analysis. Procedural pain management in neonates: A Narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1