Effects of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise teaching mode based on nurse-faculty cooperation in Fundamentals of Nursing course: A quasi-experimental study

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.06.013
Yangguang Chen , Xiaomang Li , Jia Zhao , Shenmei Li , Yunyun Dai , Zili Zhou
{"title":"Effects of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise teaching mode based on nurse-faculty cooperation in Fundamentals of Nursing course: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Yangguang Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaomang Li ,&nbsp;Jia Zhao ,&nbsp;Shenmei Li ,&nbsp;Yunyun Dai ,&nbsp;Zili Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to explore the effects of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) teaching model based on nurse-faculty collaboration in Fundamentals of Nursing course.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A quasi-experimental design was conducted. A total of 111 nursing students of two parallel classes were recruited from a nursing college in Guilin, China from February to December 2022, and allocated to the intervention group (<em>n</em> = 56) and control group (<em>n</em> = 55). The intervention group received a mini-CEX teaching model based on nurse-faculty collaboration, the teaching-learning process included scenario creation (10 min), inquiry-based learning (30 min), case report (30 min), scenario simulation exercise (40 min), and effectiveness evaluation (10 min). While the control group received conventional teaching method. All students were invited to complete the College Classroom Climate Assessment Scale (CCCA) and the Chinese version of the Competency Inventory for Nursing Students (CINS-CV) before and after the intervention. Course achievement of students was evaluated. After the intervention, the intervention group was asked an open-ended question to explore the difficulties or challenges they had encountered.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After intervention, the CCCA score (208.36 ± 23.25 vs. 190.60 ± 28.83), CINS-CV score(106.95 ± 14.48 vs. 99.55 ± 14.60), the oretical exam score (83.01 ± 4.27 vs. 79.75 ± 5.45), and scenario simulation exam score (89.23 ± 3.17 vs. 81.42 ± 7.19) of intervention group were higher than those of the control group (<em>P</em><0.01). The open-ended questionnaire survey revealed that the difficulties or challenges faced by the intervention group were mainly related to case analysis, group cooperation, learning material acquisition, and teacher guidance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Applying the mini-CEX teaching model based on nurse-faculty collaboration could cultivate nursing students’ competency, build a positive classroom climate, and improve the course achievement of students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 359-366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223000698","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to explore the effects of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) teaching model based on nurse-faculty collaboration in Fundamentals of Nursing course.

Methods

A quasi-experimental design was conducted. A total of 111 nursing students of two parallel classes were recruited from a nursing college in Guilin, China from February to December 2022, and allocated to the intervention group (n = 56) and control group (n = 55). The intervention group received a mini-CEX teaching model based on nurse-faculty collaboration, the teaching-learning process included scenario creation (10 min), inquiry-based learning (30 min), case report (30 min), scenario simulation exercise (40 min), and effectiveness evaluation (10 min). While the control group received conventional teaching method. All students were invited to complete the College Classroom Climate Assessment Scale (CCCA) and the Chinese version of the Competency Inventory for Nursing Students (CINS-CV) before and after the intervention. Course achievement of students was evaluated. After the intervention, the intervention group was asked an open-ended question to explore the difficulties or challenges they had encountered.

Results

After intervention, the CCCA score (208.36 ± 23.25 vs. 190.60 ± 28.83), CINS-CV score(106.95 ± 14.48 vs. 99.55 ± 14.60), the oretical exam score (83.01 ± 4.27 vs. 79.75 ± 5.45), and scenario simulation exam score (89.23 ± 3.17 vs. 81.42 ± 7.19) of intervention group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.01). The open-ended questionnaire survey revealed that the difficulties or challenges faced by the intervention group were mainly related to case analysis, group cooperation, learning material acquisition, and teacher guidance.

Conclusion

Applying the mini-CEX teaching model based on nurse-faculty collaboration could cultivate nursing students’ competency, build a positive classroom climate, and improve the course achievement of students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于护师合作的迷你临床评价练习教学模式在《护理基础》课程中的效果:一项准实验研究
目的探讨基于护教合作的小型临床评估练习(mini-CEX)教学模式在《护理基础》课程中的效果。方法采用准实验设计。2022年2月至12月,中国桂林一所护理学院共招收了两个平行班的111名护理专业学生,分为干预组(n=56)和对照组(n=55)。干预组接受了基于护士-教师合作的小型CEX教学模式,教学过程包括情景创建(10分钟)、基于探究的学习(30分钟)、病例报告(30 min)、情景模拟练习(40 min)和有效性评估(10 min)。对照组采用常规教学法。在干预前后,所有学生都被邀请完成大学课堂气氛评估量表(CCCA)和护理学生能力量表(CINS-CV)的中文版。对学生的课程成绩进行了评价。干预后,干预组被问到一个开放式问题,以探讨他们遇到的困难或挑战。结果干预后CCCA评分(208.36±23.25 vs.190.60±28.83),CINS-CV评分(106.95±14.48 vs.99.55±14.60),理论检查评分(83.01±4.27 vs.79.75±5.45),开放式问卷调查显示,干预组面临的困难或挑战主要与案例分析、小组合作、学习材料获取和教师指导有关。结论应用基于护教合作的微型CEX教学模式,可以培养护生的能力,营造积极的课堂氛围,提高护生的课程成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
408
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Increasing breastfeeding literacy: A preliminary study to develop an AI-based chatbot Nursing Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Retrieval augmented generation for nursing question answering with large language models Development of a large language model–based knowledge graph for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer and its implications for nursing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1