Antimicrobials in COVID-19: strategies for treating a COVID-19 pandemic.

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1515/jbcpp-2022-0061
Ajay Kumar Shukla, Saurav Misra
{"title":"Antimicrobials in COVID-19: strategies for treating a COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Ajay Kumar Shukla,&nbsp;Saurav Misra","doi":"10.1515/jbcpp-2022-0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose a serious global challenge, with the world engulfed in fighting second, third and fourth waves of the disease, which is reaching scary proportions in terms of cases and mortality in countries like India. Despite the urgent need of proven management protocols, there is still confusion about the best practices for treating COVID-19 with different pharmaceutical interventions. Antimicrobials are empirically used in COVID-19 patients. During the initial phase of this pandemic, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, azithromycin and doxycycline were widely suggested for possible prophylaxis or treatment for COVID-19 in outpatient as well as hospitalized settings. Various national and international guidelines recommended its use. However, cumulative evidence from subsequent clinical trials has revealed no significant clinical benefits in any setting, with the risk of adverse effects being high particularly in combination with azithromycin. Yet, there is continued use of antimicrobials particularly in outpatient settings which should be avoided because there is no justifiable rationale for doing so. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was one of the top problems for global public health before the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic began. AMR, which is already a difficult problem, must now be handled in the context of a changing healthcare sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":15352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","volume":"34 4","pages":"429-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2022-0061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose a serious global challenge, with the world engulfed in fighting second, third and fourth waves of the disease, which is reaching scary proportions in terms of cases and mortality in countries like India. Despite the urgent need of proven management protocols, there is still confusion about the best practices for treating COVID-19 with different pharmaceutical interventions. Antimicrobials are empirically used in COVID-19 patients. During the initial phase of this pandemic, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, azithromycin and doxycycline were widely suggested for possible prophylaxis or treatment for COVID-19 in outpatient as well as hospitalized settings. Various national and international guidelines recommended its use. However, cumulative evidence from subsequent clinical trials has revealed no significant clinical benefits in any setting, with the risk of adverse effects being high particularly in combination with azithromycin. Yet, there is continued use of antimicrobials particularly in outpatient settings which should be avoided because there is no justifiable rationale for doing so. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was one of the top problems for global public health before the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic began. AMR, which is already a difficult problem, must now be handled in the context of a changing healthcare sector.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19中的抗微生物药物:治疗COVID-19大流行的战略。
2019冠状病毒病大流行继续构成严重的全球挑战,全世界都在与第二、第三和第四波疫情作斗争,在印度等国家,这种疾病的病例和死亡率正达到可怕的程度。尽管迫切需要经过验证的管理方案,但对于使用不同药物干预措施治疗COVID-19的最佳做法仍然存在困惑。在COVID-19患者中经验性地使用抗微生物药物。在本次大流行的初始阶段,羟基氯喹、伊维菌素、阿奇霉素和强力霉素被广泛建议在门诊和住院环境中预防或治疗COVID-19。各种国家和国际准则都建议使用它。然而,来自后续临床试验的累积证据显示,在任何情况下都没有显著的临床益处,特别是与阿奇霉素联合使用时,不良反应的风险很高。然而,继续使用抗微生物药物,特别是在门诊环境中,应该避免使用,因为没有正当的理由这样做。在2019冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行开始之前,抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)是全球公共卫生的首要问题之一。抗菌素耐药性已经是一个难题,现在必须在不断变化的医疗保健部门的背景下加以处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology (JBCPP) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly published journal in experimental medicine. JBCPP publishes novel research in the physiological and pharmacological sciences, including brain research; cardiovascular-pulmonary interactions; exercise; thermal control; haematology; immune response; inflammation; metabolism; oxidative stress; and phytotherapy. As the borders between physiology, pharmacology and biochemistry become increasingly blurred, we also welcome papers using cutting-edge techniques in cellular and/or molecular biology to link descriptive or behavioral studies with cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the integrative processes. Topics: Behavior and Neuroprotection, Reproduction, Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity, Vascular Conditions, Cardiovascular Function, Cardiovascular-Pulmonary Interactions, Oxidative Stress, Metabolism, Immune Response, Hematological Profile, Inflammation, Infection, Phytotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Effect of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation on muscle mass, fat mass, and visceral fat of hemodialysis patients; A randomized clinical trial. Choroidal and retinal alteration after long-term use of tadalafil: a prospective non-randomized clinical trial. Immediate effect of sunlight exposure through blue glass on blood pressure in hypertensive patients: a randomized controlled trial. The alarming link between the COVID-19 pandemic and stroke: why ignoring this association after relapse of the disease has dangerous consequences. Identification of ocular artifact in EEG signals using VMD and Hurst exponent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1