Immediate Tooth Replacement in the Esthetic Zone with the Socket Shield Technique and a Novel Body-Shift Implant: A Pilot Study with Up to 3 Years of Follow-up.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.11607/prd.6446
Howard Gluckman, Carla Cruvinel Pontes, Stephen Chu
{"title":"Immediate Tooth Replacement in the Esthetic Zone with the Socket Shield Technique and a Novel Body-Shift Implant: A Pilot Study with Up to 3 Years of Follow-up.","authors":"Howard Gluckman,&nbsp;Carla Cruvinel Pontes,&nbsp;Stephen Chu","doi":"10.11607/prd.6446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Successful rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla remains a challenge, primarily due to postextraction ridge collapse, which can lead to gingival recession and a nonesthetic appearance. The socket shield technique presents a viable alternative for immediate dental implant placement in the esthetic zone. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the survival, complication rates, and marginal bone loss around body-shift implants placed in fresh extraction sockets with the socket shield technique to replace maxillary incisors. After socket shield preparation, 14 hopeless incisors were extracted and immediately replaced by a body-shift implant (Inverta, Southern Implants) at baseline. Patients were followed up for 12 to 39 months (mean: 18.1 ± 8.2 months). The average age was 52.3 ± 16.9 years, and the survival rate was 100%. One socket shield presented minimal internal exposure that was successfully treated with a connective tissue graft. The mean PES score was 12.9 ± 1.2. Mean interproximal marginal bone loss was -0.4 ± 0.5 mm. Body-shift implants can be a promising alternative for immediate tooth replacement combined with the socket shield technique. The superior esthetic outcomes remained stable, suggesting that the extra space created by the narrow cervical portion of the implant is beneficial for preserving the alveolar bone and limiting internal shield exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":54948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"s107-s117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Successful rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla remains a challenge, primarily due to postextraction ridge collapse, which can lead to gingival recession and a nonesthetic appearance. The socket shield technique presents a viable alternative for immediate dental implant placement in the esthetic zone. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the survival, complication rates, and marginal bone loss around body-shift implants placed in fresh extraction sockets with the socket shield technique to replace maxillary incisors. After socket shield preparation, 14 hopeless incisors were extracted and immediately replaced by a body-shift implant (Inverta, Southern Implants) at baseline. Patients were followed up for 12 to 39 months (mean: 18.1 ± 8.2 months). The average age was 52.3 ± 16.9 years, and the survival rate was 100%. One socket shield presented minimal internal exposure that was successfully treated with a connective tissue graft. The mean PES score was 12.9 ± 1.2. Mean interproximal marginal bone loss was -0.4 ± 0.5 mm. Body-shift implants can be a promising alternative for immediate tooth replacement combined with the socket shield technique. The superior esthetic outcomes remained stable, suggesting that the extra space created by the narrow cervical portion of the implant is beneficial for preserving the alveolar bone and limiting internal shield exposure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用套筒防护技术和新型体移种植体在美容区进行即时换牙:一项长达3年随访的初步研究。
前上颌骨的成功康复仍然是一个挑战,主要是由于拔出后嵴塌陷,这可能导致牙龈退缩和不美观。插座屏蔽技术提供了一种可行的替代方案,可用于在美容区立即放置牙科植入物。这项初步研究旨在评估采用牙槽盾技术替代上颌切牙的新鲜拔出牙槽中的移位体植入物的生存率、并发症发生率和边缘骨损失。在准备好牙槽盾后,取出14颗无望的门牙,并在基线时立即用身体移位植入物(Inverta,Southern Implants)代替。随访12~39个月,平均18.1±8.2个月。平均年龄52.3±16.9岁,生存率100%。一个插座护罩显示出最小的内部暴露,并通过结缔组织移植成功治疗。平均PES评分为12.9±1.2。平均邻间边缘骨损失为-0.4±0.5 mm。体移位种植体是一种很有前途的替代品,可用于结合牙槽骨防护技术的即时牙齿置换。优越的美学效果保持稳定,这表明植入物狭窄的颈部产生的额外空间有利于保留牙槽骨和限制内部护罩暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry will publish manuscripts concerned with all aspects of clinical periodontology, restorative dentistry, and implantology. This includes pertinent research as well as clinical methodology (their interdependence and relationship should be addressed where applicable); proceedings of relevant symposia or conferences; and quality review papers. Original manuscripts are considered for publication on the condition that they have not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Correlation of Gingival Stippling with Periodontal Phenotypic Features: A Cross-Sectional Study. Performance and Strength Characteristics of Suture Knots in Periodontal Microsurgery: An In Vitro Study. The Trapezoidal Sling Suture: A Technical Note of a Novel Suturing Technique for Tunneling Flap Procedures. Treatment of Mandibular Class III/IV Furcation Defects with a Combination Plastic Regenerative Technique: A Case Series. The Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative to Modulate Wound Healing of Peri-implant Soft Tissues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1