Genomics-based taxonomy to clarify cannabis classification.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Genome Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1139/gen-2023-0005
Éliana Lapierre, Adrian S Monthony, Davoud Torkamaneh
{"title":"Genomics-based taxonomy to clarify cannabis classification.","authors":"Éliana Lapierre,&nbsp;Adrian S Monthony,&nbsp;Davoud Torkamaneh","doi":"10.1139/gen-2023-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the 18th century, Carolus Linnaeus created a formalized system of classification of living organisms based on their anatomic relationships, which we know as taxonomic nomenclature. Historically, the genus <i>Cannabis</i> has been described three ways under this system: <i>Cannabis sativa</i> by C. Linnaeus in 1753, <i>Cannabis indica</i> by J.B. Lamarck in 1785, and <i>Cannabis ruderalis</i> by D.E. Janischewsky in 1924, with these taxonomic classifications having been derived from physical, morphological, chemical, and geographical data. Today, this confusing taxonomy has led to an ongoing debate about whether the genus <i>Cannabis</i> consists of a single species or multiple distinct species or subspecies. Recently, genome sequencing and bioinformatics have provided greater resolution of taxonomic assignments at the species level. As a result, some previously discussed classification frameworks have been brought into question. The aim of this review is to provide a historical context for the confusion surrounding the taxonomy of the genus <i>Cannabis</i> and highlight recent research on genomics-based taxonomical approaches to clarify the question of <i>Cannabis</i> taxonomy. We suggest that the latest evidence shifts away from the previous multiple species framework and points towards the genus <i>Cannabis</i> consisting of a highly diverse monotypic species.</p>","PeriodicalId":12809,"journal":{"name":"Genome","volume":"66 8","pages":"202-211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2023-0005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the 18th century, Carolus Linnaeus created a formalized system of classification of living organisms based on their anatomic relationships, which we know as taxonomic nomenclature. Historically, the genus Cannabis has been described three ways under this system: Cannabis sativa by C. Linnaeus in 1753, Cannabis indica by J.B. Lamarck in 1785, and Cannabis ruderalis by D.E. Janischewsky in 1924, with these taxonomic classifications having been derived from physical, morphological, chemical, and geographical data. Today, this confusing taxonomy has led to an ongoing debate about whether the genus Cannabis consists of a single species or multiple distinct species or subspecies. Recently, genome sequencing and bioinformatics have provided greater resolution of taxonomic assignments at the species level. As a result, some previously discussed classification frameworks have been brought into question. The aim of this review is to provide a historical context for the confusion surrounding the taxonomy of the genus Cannabis and highlight recent research on genomics-based taxonomical approaches to clarify the question of Cannabis taxonomy. We suggest that the latest evidence shifts away from the previous multiple species framework and points towards the genus Cannabis consisting of a highly diverse monotypic species.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以基因组学为基础的分类学阐明大麻的分类。
在18世纪,Carolus Linnaeus根据生物的解剖关系建立了一个正式的生物分类系统,我们称之为分类学命名法。从历史上看,在这个系统下,大麻属有三种描述方式:C. Linnaeus于1753年对大麻进行了描述:C. Linnaeus于1785年对大麻进行了描述;J.B. Lamarck于1785年对大麻进行了描述;D.E. Janischewsky于1924年对大麻进行了分类,这些分类都是从物理、形态、化学和地理数据中得出的。今天,这种令人困惑的分类学导致了关于大麻属是由单一物种还是多个不同物种或亚种组成的持续争论。近年来,基因组测序和生物信息学为物种水平的分类分配提供了更高的分辨率。因此,以前讨论过的一些分类框架受到了质疑。本综述的目的是提供一个历史背景,围绕大麻属的分类混淆,并强调最近的研究基于基因组学的分类方法,以澄清大麻分类学的问题。我们建议,最新的证据转移从以前的多物种框架和指向大麻属组成一个高度多样化的单型物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genome
Genome 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genome is a monthly journal, established in 1959, that publishes original research articles, reviews, mini-reviews, current opinions, and commentaries. Areas of interest include general genetics and genomics, cytogenetics, molecular and evolutionary genetics, developmental genetics, population genetics, phylogenomics, molecular identification, as well as emerging areas such as ecological, comparative, and functional genomics.
期刊最新文献
A quick guide to the calcium-dependent protein kinase family in Brassica napus. Plant immune resilience to a changing climate: Molecular insights and biotechnological roadmaps. Identification of full-length genes involved in the biosynthesis of β-caryophyllene and lupeol from the leaf transcriptome of Ayapana triplinervis. An analysis of the gaps in the South African DNA barcoding library of ticks of veterinary and public health importance. Comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of Cricula trifenestrata (Helfer) among lepidopteran insects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1