The Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulators in the Reduction of Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity: A Narrative Systematic Review.

Brandon J Goodwin, Rahyan Mahmud, Saumya TomThundyil, Gerardo Rivera-Colon, Victoria Wong Murray, Kelly O'Donnell
{"title":"The Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulators in the Reduction of Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity: A Narrative Systematic Review.","authors":"Brandon J Goodwin,&nbsp;Rahyan Mahmud,&nbsp;Saumya TomThundyil,&nbsp;Gerardo Rivera-Colon,&nbsp;Victoria Wong Murray,&nbsp;Kelly O'Donnell","doi":"10.12786/bn.2023.16.e19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review was employed utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, to analyze all primary clinical data on the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) induced spasticity. Databases include: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science. The review included case series, case studies, and clinical trials. Outcomes of interest were spasticity reduction. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria was utilized to grade the certainty of evidence. Five hundred thirty-two articles were retrieved following database systematic review. One hundred eighty-eight articles were removed as duplicates utilizing the \"Detect Duplicates\" function on Rayyan.ai. A further 344 articles were excluded following abstract and title appraisal. As a result, 16 articles were subjected to full text appraisal. The dates of publication ranged from 1973 to 2019. Although a unique modality, there is not enough evidence to support the employment of SCS over current medical standard of care. Further high-quality randomized control trials are required to elucidate SCS's role in MS induced spasticity algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/98/bn-16-e19.PMC10404813.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2023.16.e19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A systematic review was employed utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, to analyze all primary clinical data on the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) induced spasticity. Databases include: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science. The review included case series, case studies, and clinical trials. Outcomes of interest were spasticity reduction. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria was utilized to grade the certainty of evidence. Five hundred thirty-two articles were retrieved following database systematic review. One hundred eighty-eight articles were removed as duplicates utilizing the "Detect Duplicates" function on Rayyan.ai. A further 344 articles were excluded following abstract and title appraisal. As a result, 16 articles were subjected to full text appraisal. The dates of publication ranged from 1973 to 2019. Although a unique modality, there is not enough evidence to support the employment of SCS over current medical standard of care. Further high-quality randomized control trials are required to elucidate SCS's role in MS induced spasticity algorithm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓刺激器减少多发性硬化症痉挛的疗效:一项叙述性系统综述。
采用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价,分析脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗多发性硬化症(MS)诱发痉挛疗效的所有主要临床数据。数据库包括:Embase、PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane和Web of Science。综述包括病例系列、病例研究和临床试验。关注的结果是痉挛减轻。评估、发展和评价标准用于对证据的确定性进行分级。通过数据库系统评价,检索到532篇文献。利用Rayyan.ai上的“检测副本”功能,188篇文章被删除为副本。另有344篇文章在摘要和标题鉴定后被排除。结果,16篇文章进行了全文评价。出版日期从1973年到2019年。虽然是一种独特的模式,但没有足够的证据支持SCS优于当前的医疗标准。需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验来阐明SCS在MS诱导的痉挛算法中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reliability of Surface Electromyography From the Lower-limb Muscles During Maximal and Submaximal Voluntary Isometric Contractions in In-bed Healthy Individuals and Patients With Subacute Stroke. Is the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) Useful in Evaluating the Cognitive Function of Brain Injury Patients?: Through Correlation Analysis With Computerized Neurocognitive Test (CNT). Cerebrolysin Concentrate: Therapeutic Potential for Severe Oral Apraxia After Stroke: A Case Report. Sarcopenia Diagnostic Technique Based on Artificial Intelligence Using Bio-signal of Neuromuscular System: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Feasibility of Sarcopenia Diagnosis Using Stimulated Muscle Contraction Signal in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1