Pub Date : 2025-12-01eCollection Date: 2025-11-01DOI: 10.12786/bn.2025.18.e7
Hyun Haeng Lee, Yong Wook Kim, Hyoung Seop Kim, Seung Nam Yang, Sun Im, Woo-Kyoung Yoo, Joon-Ho Shin, Min-Kyun Oh, Won-Seok Kim, Da-Sol Kim, Won Kee Chang, Seyoung Shin, Sekwang Lee, Doo Young Kim, Sung-Hwa Ko, Yeo Jun Yun, Yookyung Lee, Miyoung Choi, Suk Hoon Ohn
This clinical practice guideline (CPG) is the second part of the fourth edition of the Korean Stroke Rehabilitation Guidelines, following the first part published in 2023. While, the first part addressed rehabilitation for motor function, while this second part focuses on both motor and sensory rehabilitation. Beginning with the fourth edition, significant methodological advancements have been introduced, transitioning from a consensus-based approach to an evidence-based framework using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The target population encompasses adult stroke patients, both male and female, with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke types included, while pediatric stroke cases are excluded from consideration. This guideline is primarily intended for physiatrists and specialized therapists who provide rehabilitation services to patients with stroke-related motor impairments and activities of daily living limitations across primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare facilities. The development team consisted of eighteen stroke rehabilitation specialists and one expert in CPG development methodology. Key questions were formulated based on target population preferences and international stroke rehabilitation guidelines, with subsequent refinement by specialists responsible for each respective topic. Draft recommendations underwent a formal consensus process using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method, followed by further refinement through public hearings and external expert evaluation.
{"title":"Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea-Part 2: Rehabilitation for Motor and Sensory Function (2024).","authors":"Hyun Haeng Lee, Yong Wook Kim, Hyoung Seop Kim, Seung Nam Yang, Sun Im, Woo-Kyoung Yoo, Joon-Ho Shin, Min-Kyun Oh, Won-Seok Kim, Da-Sol Kim, Won Kee Chang, Seyoung Shin, Sekwang Lee, Doo Young Kim, Sung-Hwa Ko, Yeo Jun Yun, Yookyung Lee, Miyoung Choi, Suk Hoon Ohn","doi":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e7","DOIUrl":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This clinical practice guideline (CPG) is the second part of the fourth edition of the Korean Stroke Rehabilitation Guidelines, following the first part published in 2023. While, the first part addressed rehabilitation for motor function, while this second part focuses on both motor and sensory rehabilitation. Beginning with the fourth edition, significant methodological advancements have been introduced, transitioning from a consensus-based approach to an evidence-based framework using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The target population encompasses adult stroke patients, both male and female, with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke types included, while pediatric stroke cases are excluded from consideration. This guideline is primarily intended for physiatrists and specialized therapists who provide rehabilitation services to patients with stroke-related motor impairments and activities of daily living limitations across primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare facilities. The development team consisted of eighteen stroke rehabilitation specialists and one expert in CPG development methodology. Key questions were formulated based on target population preferences and international stroke rehabilitation guidelines, with subsequent refinement by specialists responsible for each respective topic. Draft recommendations underwent a formal consensus process using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method, followed by further refinement through public hearings and external expert evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"18 3","pages":"e7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12710289/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145783804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-27eCollection Date: 2025-11-01DOI: 10.12786/bn.2025.18.e6
Doo Young Kim
This review presents a clinical framework for motor rehabilitation in patients with Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes. Its purpose is to provide practical, individualized rehabilitation strategies that consider both disease stage and the clinical characteristics of each syndrome. Motor symptoms such as bradykinesia, rigidity, postural instability, and gait disturbance are major contributors to disability and reduced independence in these populations. Although pharmacological treatment remains fundamental, rehabilitation is crucial for maintaining mobility and preventing falls. This review discusses stage-based approaches, including early education in self-management and compensatory movement strategies, as well as advanced interventions for patients with severe motor dysfunction. Syndrome-specific features are also addressed. For example, patients with progressive supranuclear palsy often exhibit early axial rigidity and postural extension, while those with multiple system atrophy may experience cerebellar ataxia or autonomic dysfunction. In corticobasal degeneration, motor planning deficits and sensory loss may resemble symptoms seen in cortical stroke. Additionally, the review emphasizes the importance of recognizing and managing dystonia, which can further impair motor function and safety. While the primary focus is on motor symptoms, the influence of non-motor features such as cognitive impairment and autonomic instability is also acknowledged in rehabilitation planning. Overall, this review aims to support clinical decision-making through a structured, patient-centered approach to motor rehabilitation in parkinsonism.
{"title":"Clinical Framework for Motor Rehabilitation in Parkinsonism: Integrating Individualized and Syndrome-Specific Approaches.","authors":"Doo Young Kim","doi":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e6","DOIUrl":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review presents a clinical framework for motor rehabilitation in patients with Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes. Its purpose is to provide practical, individualized rehabilitation strategies that consider both disease stage and the clinical characteristics of each syndrome. Motor symptoms such as bradykinesia, rigidity, postural instability, and gait disturbance are major contributors to disability and reduced independence in these populations. Although pharmacological treatment remains fundamental, rehabilitation is crucial for maintaining mobility and preventing falls. This review discusses stage-based approaches, including early education in self-management and compensatory movement strategies, as well as advanced interventions for patients with severe motor dysfunction. Syndrome-specific features are also addressed. For example, patients with progressive supranuclear palsy often exhibit early axial rigidity and postural extension, while those with multiple system atrophy may experience cerebellar ataxia or autonomic dysfunction. In corticobasal degeneration, motor planning deficits and sensory loss may resemble symptoms seen in cortical stroke. Additionally, the review emphasizes the importance of recognizing and managing dystonia, which can further impair motor function and safety. While the primary focus is on motor symptoms, the influence of non-motor features such as cognitive impairment and autonomic instability is also acknowledged in rehabilitation planning. Overall, this review aims to support clinical decision-making through a structured, patient-centered approach to motor rehabilitation in parkinsonism.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"18 3","pages":"e6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12710285/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145783747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-17eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.12786/bn.2025.18.e5
Hoo Young Lee, Byungju Ryu
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has emerged as a potential adjunct to conventional rehabilitation though findings remain inconsistent. This study investigated the efficacy of rTMS combined with conventional rehabilitation in improving motor function and spasticity after stroke through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched through February 2022. Sixty-eight randomized controlled trials were included based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. rTMS significantly improved upper limb motor outcomes including Fugl-Meyer assessment scores (mean difference [MD], 3.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 4.92; p = 0.002), hand function (standardized MD, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.52; p = 0.02), and grip strength (MD, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.20 to 6.03; p = 0.003), with low-certainty evidence. It also significantly reduced upper limb spasticity (MD, -0.48; 95% CI, -0.64 to -0.33; p < 0.00001), with low-certainty evidence. No significant effects were observed for lower limb motor outcomes, and evidence for lower limb spasticity was insufficient. These findings suggest that rTMS may be considered as an adjunct to to enhance upper limb motor function and reduce spasticity in stroke rehabilitation. However, its use for lower limb recovery should be individualized based on neurological status. Further studies are needed to establish optimal protocols and long-term effects.
{"title":"Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper and Lower Limb Motor Function and Spasticity After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hoo Young Lee, Byungju Ryu","doi":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e5","DOIUrl":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has emerged as a potential adjunct to conventional rehabilitation though findings remain inconsistent. This study investigated the efficacy of rTMS combined with conventional rehabilitation in improving motor function and spasticity after stroke through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched through February 2022. Sixty-eight randomized controlled trials were included based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. rTMS significantly improved upper limb motor outcomes including Fugl-Meyer assessment scores (mean difference [MD], 3.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 4.92; p = 0.002), hand function (standardized MD, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.52; p = 0.02), and grip strength (MD, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.20 to 6.03; p = 0.003), with low-certainty evidence. It also significantly reduced upper limb spasticity (MD, -0.48; 95% CI, -0.64 to -0.33; p < 0.00001), with low-certainty evidence. No significant effects were observed for lower limb motor outcomes, and evidence for lower limb spasticity was insufficient. These findings suggest that rTMS may be considered as an adjunct to to enhance upper limb motor function and reduce spasticity in stroke rehabilitation. However, its use for lower limb recovery should be individualized based on neurological status. Further studies are needed to establish optimal protocols and long-term effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"18 2","pages":"e5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12438566/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145082488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-20eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.12786/bn.2025.18.e4
Jong Mi Park, Yong Wook Kim, Sang Chul Lee, Seo Yeon Yoon
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate in patients with brain disease. A comprehensive search up to November 4, 2024 identified 33 randomized controlled trials involving 1,369 participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), other dementias, and multiple sclerosis. Methylphenidate was administered at 10-80 mg/day or 0.1-1 mg/kg/day for durations ranging from a single dose to 6 months. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model, with study quality evaluated via the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Methylphenidate significantly improved attention (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.84), particularly in TBI. Motor function improved in stroke populations (mean difference [MD], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.13 to 1.18), while activities of daily living (ADL) significantly improved in stroke and AD (SMD, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.06). Apathy was significantly reduced in AD (SMD, -0.60; 95% CI, -0.95 to -0.26), and depression improved across patients with PD, stroke, and TBI (SMD, -0.50; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.05). No significant effects were observed for consciousness, global cognition, executive function, fatigue, or quality of life. Side effects were mild, with a slight increase in pulse rate (MD, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.47). In summary, methylphenidate improves attention (TBI), motor function (stroke), ADL (stroke, AD), and mood, especially apathy (AD) and depression, with a favorable safety profile. Its effects appear condition-specific, and further research is needed to confirm long-term efficacy and establish standardized protocols.
Trial registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Identifier: CRD42024563826.
{"title":"Efficacy of Methylphenidate in Patients With Brain Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jong Mi Park, Yong Wook Kim, Sang Chul Lee, Seo Yeon Yoon","doi":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e4","DOIUrl":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate in patients with brain disease. A comprehensive search up to November 4, 2024 identified 33 randomized controlled trials involving 1,369 participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), other dementias, and multiple sclerosis. Methylphenidate was administered at 10-80 mg/day or 0.1-1 mg/kg/day for durations ranging from a single dose to 6 months. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model, with study quality evaluated via the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Methylphenidate significantly improved attention (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.84), particularly in TBI. Motor function improved in stroke populations (mean difference [MD], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.13 to 1.18), while activities of daily living (ADL) significantly improved in stroke and AD (SMD, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.06). Apathy was significantly reduced in AD (SMD, -0.60; 95% CI, -0.95 to -0.26), and depression improved across patients with PD, stroke, and TBI (SMD, -0.50; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.05). No significant effects were observed for consciousness, global cognition, executive function, fatigue, or quality of life. Side effects were mild, with a slight increase in pulse rate (MD, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.47). In summary, methylphenidate improves attention (TBI), motor function (stroke), ADL (stroke, AD), and mood, especially apathy (AD) and depression, with a favorable safety profile. Its effects appear condition-specific, and further research is needed to confirm long-term efficacy and establish standardized protocols.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Identifier: CRD42024563826.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"18 2","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12438567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145082491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-24eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.12786/bn.2025.18.e3
Chin-Hen Chang, Thomas Wasser, Somkiat Hemtasilpa
This retrospective cohort study aimed to identify predictive factors for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring short (≤ 14 days) or long (≥ 15 days) rehabilitation length of stays (LOSs).The study was conducted in an acute rehabilitation hospital associated with a community-based tertiary medical center. Patients who were admitted to the acute inpatient rehabilitation unit with TBI between January 2020 and September 2022 were included (n = 197). The mean rehabilitation LOS of the 197 patients was 16.73 ± 9.4 days. A long rehabilitation LOS was associated with a higher rate of urinary tract infection in the rehabilitation facility (p = 0.002), a higher rate of lung infection in the inpatient rehabilitation facility (p = 0.003), unplanned readmission to acute care (p < 0.001), a longer LOS in acute care before admission to rehabilitation (p < 0.001), and a lower Section GG score on admission to rehabilitation (p < 0.001). The logistic regression model revealed having lower Section GG scores on admission to rehabilitation as the only factor predictive of a long rehabilitation LOS (odds ratio, 0.91; p < 0.001). Our study revealed that the Section GG score at admission to inpatient rehabilitation facilities is a predictor of rehabilitation LOS.
{"title":"Factors Associated With Rehabilitation Length of Stay in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Chin-Hen Chang, Thomas Wasser, Somkiat Hemtasilpa","doi":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e3","DOIUrl":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective cohort study aimed to identify predictive factors for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring short (≤ 14 days) or long (≥ 15 days) rehabilitation length of stays (LOSs).The study was conducted in an acute rehabilitation hospital associated with a community-based tertiary medical center. Patients who were admitted to the acute inpatient rehabilitation unit with TBI between January 2020 and September 2022 were included (n = 197). The mean rehabilitation LOS of the 197 patients was 16.73 ± 9.4 days. A long rehabilitation LOS was associated with a higher rate of urinary tract infection in the rehabilitation facility (p = 0.002), a higher rate of lung infection in the inpatient rehabilitation facility (p = 0.003), unplanned readmission to acute care (p < 0.001), a longer LOS in acute care before admission to rehabilitation (p < 0.001), and a lower Section GG score on admission to rehabilitation (p < 0.001). The logistic regression model revealed having lower Section GG scores on admission to rehabilitation as the only factor predictive of a long rehabilitation LOS (odds ratio, 0.91; p < 0.001). Our study revealed that the Section GG score at admission to inpatient rehabilitation facilities is a predictor of rehabilitation LOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"18 1","pages":"e3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966006/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143796275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-27eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.12786/bn.2025.18.e2
Woo-Kyoung Yoo, Yongkyun Jung, Gyu Jin Kim, Shahid Bashir, Jihyun Park
This meta-analysis presents an updated comparison between virtual reality (VR) training and conventional training (CT) in post-stroke rehabilitation by incorporating recent studies based on prior meta-analyses. We searched 3 international electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) and a Korean database (KoreaMed) to identify relevant studies. Out of 5,218 studies, 30 randomized controlled trials were selected through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. Among these, 21 focused on upper limb training and 14 on lower limb training. A subgroup meta-analysis was conducted based on the VR type. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane's RoB tool. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) method. The outcomes were categorized into upper limb motor function, fine motor function, and activities of daily living (ADLs) for upper limb training, and lower limb motor function, balance, and gait velocity for lower limb training. A random-effects model for the meta-analysis indicated that VR training showed significant superiority over CT in improving upper limb motor function, ADL, and balance. This study provides low- to moderate-certainty evidence supporting the superiority of VR training over CT. Clinicians and therapists should consider individual rehabilitation needs, goals, patient preferences, and available resources when selecting VR for post-stroke functional recovery.
本荟萃分析结合了基于先前荟萃分析的最新研究,对虚拟现实(VR)训练和传统训练(CT)在脑卒中后康复中的最新比较。我们检索了3个国际电子数据库(MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆)和一个韩国数据库(KoreaMed)来确定相关研究。从5218项研究中,通过系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法选择了30项随机对照试验。其中上肢训练21项,下肢训练14项。根据VR类型进行亚组meta分析。使用Cochrane的RoB工具评估偏倚风险(risk of bias, RoB)。使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法评估证据的确定性。结果分为上肢训练的上肢运动功能、精细运动功能和日常生活活动(ADLs),下肢训练的下肢运动功能、平衡和步态速度。荟萃分析的随机效应模型显示,VR训练在改善上肢运动功能、ADL和平衡方面明显优于CT。这项研究提供了低到中等确定性的证据,支持VR训练优于CT。临床医生和治疗师在选择VR进行脑卒中后功能恢复时,应考虑个体康复需求、目标、患者偏好和可用资源。
{"title":"The Effects of Virtual Reality Training on Post-Stroke Upper and Lower Limb Function: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Woo-Kyoung Yoo, Yongkyun Jung, Gyu Jin Kim, Shahid Bashir, Jihyun Park","doi":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e2","DOIUrl":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis presents an updated comparison between virtual reality (VR) training and conventional training (CT) in post-stroke rehabilitation by incorporating recent studies based on prior meta-analyses. We searched 3 international electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) and a Korean database (KoreaMed) to identify relevant studies. Out of 5,218 studies, 30 randomized controlled trials were selected through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. Among these, 21 focused on upper limb training and 14 on lower limb training. A subgroup meta-analysis was conducted based on the VR type. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane's RoB tool. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) method. The outcomes were categorized into upper limb motor function, fine motor function, and activities of daily living (ADLs) for upper limb training, and lower limb motor function, balance, and gait velocity for lower limb training. A random-effects model for the meta-analysis indicated that VR training showed significant superiority over CT in improving upper limb motor function, ADL, and balance. This study provides low- to moderate-certainty evidence supporting the superiority of VR training over CT. Clinicians and therapists should consider individual rehabilitation needs, goals, patient preferences, and available resources when selecting VR for post-stroke functional recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"18 1","pages":"e2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966005/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143796365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-27eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.12786/bn.2025.18.e1
Wonhee Lee, Seung-Ick Choi, Seok Jong Chung, Jun Kyu Hwang, Na Young Kim
Improvement in gait after a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap test is a key indicator for shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients. However, quantitative analysis of gait requires sophisticated equipment and specialists that limit practical use. Development of Bluetooth-connected sensors offers affordable way to assess gait. We present a case of iNPH patient in whom gait changes were serially assessed using a smart insole before and after intervention, which helped in clinical decision making. A 68-year-old female who showed the triad of iNPH symptoms (gait disturbance, cognitive decline, and urinary frequency) were evaluated. Before and after the CSF tap test, gait was analyzed and compared using the smart insole with four pressure sensors and accelerometer, along with conventional spatiotemporal parameters. While no significant changes were observed between pre- and post-tap test in conventional parameters of gait, several changes were found in the data collected from the smart insole, including improved heel strike, step regularity and symmetry. Advanced surgical intervention was performed based on subjective and objective improvement in gait. The improved gait was maintained at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Our case showed that easy-to-use smart insoles could assist clinical decisions by providing additional information.
{"title":"Serial Assessment of Gait Changes After Interventions Using Smart Insole in a Patient With iNPH: A Proof-of-Concept Case Report.","authors":"Wonhee Lee, Seung-Ick Choi, Seok Jong Chung, Jun Kyu Hwang, Na Young Kim","doi":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e1","DOIUrl":"10.12786/bn.2025.18.e1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improvement in gait after a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap test is a key indicator for shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients. However, quantitative analysis of gait requires sophisticated equipment and specialists that limit practical use. Development of Bluetooth-connected sensors offers affordable way to assess gait. We present a case of iNPH patient in whom gait changes were serially assessed using a smart insole before and after intervention, which helped in clinical decision making. A 68-year-old female who showed the triad of iNPH symptoms (gait disturbance, cognitive decline, and urinary frequency) were evaluated. Before and after the CSF tap test, gait was analyzed and compared using the smart insole with four pressure sensors and accelerometer, along with conventional spatiotemporal parameters. While no significant changes were observed between pre- and post-tap test in conventional parameters of gait, several changes were found in the data collected from the smart insole, including improved heel strike, step regularity and symmetry. Advanced surgical intervention was performed based on subjective and objective improvement in gait. The improved gait was maintained at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Our case showed that easy-to-use smart insoles could assist clinical decisions by providing additional information.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"18 1","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966007/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143796364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-28eCollection Date: 2024-11-01DOI: 10.12786/bn.2024.17.e25
Pureum Kim, Seong Hoon Lim, Jong In Lee, Ho-Geon Namgung, Donghwan Kim, Eun Ji Lee
Lyme disease is a multisystem infection that can affect the joints, heart, and nervous system when untreated. While it can present with cranial nerve palsy, dysphagia is rarely reported. This case highlights a rare instance of dysphagia in Lyme disease, typically known for neurological symptoms like facial nerve palsy. Despite the absence of erythema migrans or a documented tick bite, the patient's facial palsy, hearing loss, vocal cord paralysis, and dysphagia were attributed to Lyme disease. With the rising prevalence of Lyme disease, similar cases may increase, particularly in endemic regions of North America, Europe, and parts of Asia, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and treatment in patients with unexplained dysphagia.
{"title":"Dysphagia due to Lyme Disease: A Case Report.","authors":"Pureum Kim, Seong Hoon Lim, Jong In Lee, Ho-Geon Namgung, Donghwan Kim, Eun Ji Lee","doi":"10.12786/bn.2024.17.e25","DOIUrl":"10.12786/bn.2024.17.e25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lyme disease is a multisystem infection that can affect the joints, heart, and nervous system when untreated. While it can present with cranial nerve palsy, dysphagia is rarely reported. This case highlights a rare instance of dysphagia in Lyme disease, typically known for neurological symptoms like facial nerve palsy. Despite the absence of erythema migrans or a documented tick bite, the patient's facial palsy, hearing loss, vocal cord paralysis, and dysphagia were attributed to Lyme disease. With the rising prevalence of Lyme disease, similar cases may increase, particularly in endemic regions of North America, Europe, and parts of Asia, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and treatment in patients with unexplained dysphagia.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"17 3","pages":"e25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621671/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142803667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-28eCollection Date: 2024-11-01DOI: 10.12786/bn.2024.17.e24
Soo Ho Lee, Yeun Jie Yoo
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique with potential in stroke rehabilitation by modulating cortical excitability. However, the optimal parameters, including electrode placement, current intensity, stimulation duration, and electrode size, remain poorly understood, and the interactions among these factors contribute to mixed results in motor recovery post-stroke. This review explores the various stimulation parameters and their impact on enhancing corticospinal excitability (CSE) and motor function recovery. Different electrode placement (montages), such as anodal, cathodal, and bi-hemispheric stimulation, have demonstrated varying effectiveness in restoring motor function. Bihemispheric stimulation demonstrated a larger effect size compared to other unihemispheric (anodal or cathodal) stimulation; however, its relative superiority remains inconclusive. Inter-individual anatomical variations, such as skull thickness, lesion location, and cortical atrophy, can affect tDCS outcomes, highlighting the need for personalized electrode placement guided by computational modeling based on brain imaging. Furthermore, stimulation intensity, typically 1-2 mA, exhibited nonlinear effects on CSE, contrasting with the dose-response relationships observed in earlier studies. Stimulation duration is also critical, with evidence suggesting that prolonged stimulation may reverse excitability-enhancing effects beyond a certain threshold. While smaller electrodes enhance focality, an appropriately sized electrode is necessary to effectively modulate electrical activity in the target region, with evidence suggesting a dose-response relationship between electrode size and motor recovery. Overall, the interplay among these parameters underscores the need for personalized and optimized tDCS protocols to achieve consistent motor recovery in stroke patients. Future research should focus on refining these parameters to maximize the therapeutic benefits of tDCS.
{"title":"A Literature Review on Optimal Stimulation Parameters of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Motor Recovery After Stroke.","authors":"Soo Ho Lee, Yeun Jie Yoo","doi":"10.12786/bn.2024.17.e24","DOIUrl":"10.12786/bn.2024.17.e24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique with potential in stroke rehabilitation by modulating cortical excitability. However, the optimal parameters, including electrode placement, current intensity, stimulation duration, and electrode size, remain poorly understood, and the interactions among these factors contribute to mixed results in motor recovery post-stroke. This review explores the various stimulation parameters and their impact on enhancing corticospinal excitability (CSE) and motor function recovery. Different electrode placement (montages), such as anodal, cathodal, and bi-hemispheric stimulation, have demonstrated varying effectiveness in restoring motor function. Bihemispheric stimulation demonstrated a larger effect size compared to other unihemispheric (anodal or cathodal) stimulation; however, its relative superiority remains inconclusive. Inter-individual anatomical variations, such as skull thickness, lesion location, and cortical atrophy, can affect tDCS outcomes, highlighting the need for personalized electrode placement guided by computational modeling based on brain imaging. Furthermore, stimulation intensity, typically 1-2 mA, exhibited nonlinear effects on CSE, contrasting with the dose-response relationships observed in earlier studies. Stimulation duration is also critical, with evidence suggesting that prolonged stimulation may reverse excitability-enhancing effects beyond a certain threshold. While smaller electrodes enhance focality, an appropriately sized electrode is necessary to effectively modulate electrical activity in the target region, with evidence suggesting a dose-response relationship between electrode size and motor recovery. Overall, the interplay among these parameters underscores the need for personalized and optimized tDCS protocols to achieve consistent motor recovery in stroke patients. Future research should focus on refining these parameters to maximize the therapeutic benefits of tDCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"17 3","pages":"e24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142803665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-27eCollection Date: 2024-11-01DOI: 10.12786/bn.2024.17.e23
Jinmann Chon, Yunsoo Soh, Ga Yang Shim
Sarcopenia is characterized by the progressive loss of muscle mass and strength and can be categorized as either primary or secondary. Patients who have experienced a stroke may develop sarcopenia, which can adversely impact their functional recovery. The pathophysiology of sarcopenia related to stroke involves nutritional deficiency, disuse atrophy, denervation, and metabolic disturbance. Various evaluation tools are available to diagnose this condition, assessing skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical function. However, due to the limitations of traditional sarcopenia diagnostic criteria in the context of stroke, there is pressing need to establish diagnostic standards that accurately reflect the disabilities experienced by patients with stroke.
{"title":"Stroke-Related Sarcopenia: Pathophysiology and Diagnostic Tools.","authors":"Jinmann Chon, Yunsoo Soh, Ga Yang Shim","doi":"10.12786/bn.2024.17.e23","DOIUrl":"10.12786/bn.2024.17.e23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sarcopenia is characterized by the progressive loss of muscle mass and strength and can be categorized as either primary or secondary. Patients who have experienced a stroke may develop sarcopenia, which can adversely impact their functional recovery. The pathophysiology of sarcopenia related to stroke involves nutritional deficiency, disuse atrophy, denervation, and metabolic disturbance. Various evaluation tools are available to diagnose this condition, assessing skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical function. However, due to the limitations of traditional sarcopenia diagnostic criteria in the context of stroke, there is pressing need to establish diagnostic standards that accurately reflect the disabilities experienced by patients with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"17 3","pages":"e23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621676/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142803676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}