The ECO VI Organizational Climate Scale: An Invariance Study in Four Latin American Countries.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Psychological Research Pub Date : 2023-06-20 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21500/20112084.5937
Guido Martinolli, Alejandro Sanín-Posada, Núria Tordera
{"title":"The ECO VI Organizational Climate Scale: An Invariance Study in Four Latin American Countries.","authors":"Guido Martinolli,&nbsp;Alejandro Sanín-Posada,&nbsp;Núria Tordera","doi":"10.21500/20112084.5937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cross-cultural research is fundamental for the development and validation of work and organizational theories and to guide evidence-based practices around the globe. Although organizational climate is one of the most investigated higher-level constructs in organizational psychology, there is a lack of research analysing the invariance of measurements across national cultures in Latin America. This prevents scientists and practitioners from having a deeper understanding of this variable across the different countries and cultures composing this continent.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims at examining the measurement invariance of the <i>Encuesta de Clima Organizacional</i> scale in its VI version (ECO VI) in Colombia, Costa Rica, Panama, and Dominican Republic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were gathered from 38 companies operating in the manufacturing sector based in the four abovementioned countries and the sample sizes were as follows: Colombia was represented by 1007 employees, Costa Rica by 1090 employees, Panama by 372 employees, and Dominican Republic by 213. Measurement invariance was examined by testing the configural, metric, scalar, and structural models of invariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results supported with empirical evidence that the ECO VI scale is characterized by measurement invariance. More precisely, 6 of its 8 dimensions are unbiasedly interpreted and can be considered for making meaningful comparisons across the considered national cultures, while the outputs deriving from the dimensions of \"resources availability\" and \"interpersonal relationships\" should be treated with more caution. Indeed, for such dimensions support for only configural and metric invariance was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The main contribution of the present study was to provide evidence about the measurement invariance of the ECO VI scale. Thus, providing the community of scientists and practitioners operating in different Latin American countries with a molar organizational climate scale that can be used for conducting cross-cultural research. Hence, it is now possible to have a deeper understanding of how theories and practices involving the organizational climate for well-being can be better applied across the countries and cultures composing this continent.</p>","PeriodicalId":46542,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychological Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"89-102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b1/eb/2011-2084-ijpr-16-01-89.PMC10402644.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cross-cultural research is fundamental for the development and validation of work and organizational theories and to guide evidence-based practices around the globe. Although organizational climate is one of the most investigated higher-level constructs in organizational psychology, there is a lack of research analysing the invariance of measurements across national cultures in Latin America. This prevents scientists and practitioners from having a deeper understanding of this variable across the different countries and cultures composing this continent.

Objectives: This study aims at examining the measurement invariance of the Encuesta de Clima Organizacional scale in its VI version (ECO VI) in Colombia, Costa Rica, Panama, and Dominican Republic.

Method: Data were gathered from 38 companies operating in the manufacturing sector based in the four abovementioned countries and the sample sizes were as follows: Colombia was represented by 1007 employees, Costa Rica by 1090 employees, Panama by 372 employees, and Dominican Republic by 213. Measurement invariance was examined by testing the configural, metric, scalar, and structural models of invariance.

Results: The results supported with empirical evidence that the ECO VI scale is characterized by measurement invariance. More precisely, 6 of its 8 dimensions are unbiasedly interpreted and can be considered for making meaningful comparisons across the considered national cultures, while the outputs deriving from the dimensions of "resources availability" and "interpersonal relationships" should be treated with more caution. Indeed, for such dimensions support for only configural and metric invariance was found.

Conclusions: The main contribution of the present study was to provide evidence about the measurement invariance of the ECO VI scale. Thus, providing the community of scientists and practitioners operating in different Latin American countries with a molar organizational climate scale that can be used for conducting cross-cultural research. Hence, it is now possible to have a deeper understanding of how theories and practices involving the organizational climate for well-being can be better applied across the countries and cultures composing this continent.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ECO VI组织气候尺度:四个拉丁美洲国家的不变性研究。
引言:跨文化研究是发展和验证工作和组织理论以及指导全球循证实践的基础。尽管组织氛围是组织心理学中研究最多的高层结构之一,但缺乏对拉丁美洲不同民族文化测量不变性的分析研究。这阻碍了科学家和从业者对构成这个大陆的不同国家和文化的这一变量有更深入的了解。目的:本研究旨在检验Encuesta de Clima Organisational量表VI版(ECO VI)在哥伦比亚、哥斯达黎加、巴拿马的测量不变性,方法:从上述四个国家的38家制造业公司收集数据,样本量如下:哥伦比亚有1007名员工,哥斯达黎加有1090名员工,巴拿马有372名员工,多米尼加共和国有213名员工。通过测试不变性的概念、度量、标量和结构模型来检验测量不变性。结果:实验证明ECO VI量表具有测量不变性。更准确地说,它的8个维度中有6个是不受约束地解释的,可以被认为是在所考虑的民族文化之间进行有意义的比较,而从“资源可用性”和“人际关系”维度产生的产出应该更加谨慎地对待。事实上,对于这样的维度,只发现了确定性和度量不变性的支持。结论:本研究的主要贡献是为ECO VI量表的测量不变性提供了证据。因此,为在不同拉丁美洲国家工作的科学家和从业者群体提供了一个可用于进行跨文化研究的摩尔组织氛围量表。因此,现在有可能更深入地了解如何在构成这个大陆的国家和文化中更好地应用涉及幸福组织氛围的理论和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychological Research
International Journal of Psychological Research PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychological Research (Int.j.psychol.res) is the Faculty of Psychology’s official publication of San Buenaventura University in Medellin, Colombia. Int.j.psychol.res relies on a vast and diverse theoretical and thematic publishing material, which includes unpublished productions of diverse psychological issues and behavioral human areas such as psychiatry, neurosciences, mental health, among others.
期刊最新文献
Voluntary Ethanol Intake and Anxiety Behavior in Wistar-Uis Rats. Gaslighting Exposure During Emerging Adulthood: Personality Traits and Vulnerability Paths. Validity and Internal Consistency of a Spanish Version of the Cognitive Flexibil ity Scale (CFS). Attitudes of the Host Population towards Syrian Refugees: A New Theoretical Perspective Translation of Well-being Assessment Instruments in African Contexts: A Mapping Review and Future Directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1