Slovenian version of the scoliosis research society instrument-22 revised (SRS-22r) in adolescents and adults: Psychometric properties and some implications.

IF 1 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3233/PRM-210127
Marina Rojc, Katja Groleger Sršen, Janez Mohar, Gaj Vidmar
{"title":"Slovenian version of the scoliosis research society instrument-22 revised (SRS-22r) in adolescents and adults: Psychometric properties and some implications.","authors":"Marina Rojc, Katja Groleger Sršen, Janez Mohar, Gaj Vidmar","doi":"10.3233/PRM-210127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to provide a reliable and valid translation of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22r) questionnaire, compare it with the EQ-5D-5 L questionnaire, and analyse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) in Slovenia in order to potentially improve their rehabilitation processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A matched-case-control study was performed to assess internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and discriminative validity. The questionnaire was returned by 25 adolescent IS patients, 25 adult IS patients, and 25 healthy controls (87%, 71%, and 100% response rate, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistency was high for all four scales in the adult IS group, but lower among the adolescent patients. Test-retest reliability of the SRS-22r was high to very high in both patient groups. Correlations between SRS-22r and EQ-5D-5 L were low or close to zero among adolescent patients and moderate or high among adult IS patients. SRS-22r domain scores were statistically significantly different between adult patients and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study proved that the Slovenian version of SRS-22r has the psychometric properties needed to measure HRQoL, whereby it appears to be more reliable for adults than adolescents. When used with IS adolescents, SRS-22r is affected by a severe ceiling effect. It could be used for longitudinal follow-up of adult patients after rehabilitation treatment. Additionally, some important issues that adolescents and adults with IS are faced with were identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":16692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","volume":"16 2","pages":"351-359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-210127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to provide a reliable and valid translation of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22r) questionnaire, compare it with the EQ-5D-5 L questionnaire, and analyse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) in Slovenia in order to potentially improve their rehabilitation processes.

Methods: A matched-case-control study was performed to assess internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and discriminative validity. The questionnaire was returned by 25 adolescent IS patients, 25 adult IS patients, and 25 healthy controls (87%, 71%, and 100% response rate, respectively).

Results: Internal consistency was high for all four scales in the adult IS group, but lower among the adolescent patients. Test-retest reliability of the SRS-22r was high to very high in both patient groups. Correlations between SRS-22r and EQ-5D-5 L were low or close to zero among adolescent patients and moderate or high among adult IS patients. SRS-22r domain scores were statistically significantly different between adult patients and healthy controls.

Conclusion: The study proved that the Slovenian version of SRS-22r has the psychometric properties needed to measure HRQoL, whereby it appears to be more reliable for adults than adolescents. When used with IS adolescents, SRS-22r is affected by a severe ceiling effect. It could be used for longitudinal follow-up of adult patients after rehabilitation treatment. Additionally, some important issues that adolescents and adults with IS are faced with were identified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯洛文尼亚版青少年和成人脊柱侧凸研究学会工具-22 修订版(SRS-22r):心理测量学特性及一些影响。
目的:本研究旨在提供可靠有效的脊柱侧凸研究学会-22(SRS-22r)问卷的翻译版本,将其与 EQ-5D-5 L 问卷进行比较,并分析斯洛文尼亚特发性脊柱侧凸(IS)患者与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL),从而改善他们的康复过程:方法:进行了一项匹配病例对照研究,以评估内部一致性可靠性、重测可靠性、并发有效性和区分有效性。25名青少年IS患者、25名成年IS患者和25名健康对照者(回复率分别为87%、71%和100%)交回了问卷:结果:成人 IS 组的四个量表的内部一致性都很高,但青少年患者的内部一致性较低。SRS-22r在两组患者中的重测可靠性都很高甚至非常高。在青少年患者中,SRS-22r 与 EQ-5D-5 L 之间的相关性较低或接近于零,而在成年 IS 患者中,两者之间的相关性为中等或较高。成年患者和健康对照组的 SRS-22r 域得分在统计学上有显著差异:该研究证明,斯洛文尼亚版 SRS-22r 具有测量 HRQoL 所需的心理测量特性,对成人而言似乎比对青少年更为可靠。当 SRS-22r 用于 IS 青少年时,会受到严重的上限效应的影响。SRS-22r可用于成年患者康复治疗后的纵向随访。此外,还发现了青少年和成年 IS 患者面临的一些重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
139
期刊最新文献
Pediatrician reported experiences of transitioning adolescents with disabilities. Psychometric Evaluation of Sexual Knowledge and Self-Efficacy Components of the SPARKS Survey for Adults with Spina Bifida. Coping experiences in child and adolescent rehabilitation through a novel device: A multi-method feasibility study. Acute effect of hippotherapy applied on different sitting surfaces in children with special needs. Effects of diaphragmatic breathing and manual diaphragm relaxation on respiratory muscle strength, chest expansion, pulmonary function, and sitting ability in children with diplegic cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1