Reliability of FUNDES-Child-SE - measuring participation and independence of children and youths with disabilities.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1080/11038128.2023.2237214
Jennifer Gothilander, Anna Ullenhag, Henrik Danielsson, Anna Karin Axelsson
{"title":"Reliability of FUNDES-Child-SE - measuring participation and independence of children and youths with disabilities.","authors":"Jennifer Gothilander, Anna Ullenhag, Henrik Danielsson, Anna Karin Axelsson","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2023.2237214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need for an instrument to measure participation and independence in children with disabilities. FUNDES-Child-SE has its origin in the participation questionnaire Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Test the psychometric properties of internal consistency and test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included caregivers of 163 children with disability aged 6-18 years, 59 of whom were also included in the test-retest study. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the proportions of valid ratings. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were tested through Cronbach's alpha and the intra-class correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amount of not relevant/not applicable ratings was substantial but varied between items and subdomains. Internal consistency was acceptable (0.8-0.95), and the test-retest was marginal to excellent (0.73-0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reliability together with the content validity support the use of the FUNDES-Child-SE to measure participation and independence in children with disabilities. However, results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size and possible selection bias. Modifications to reduce the not relevant/not applicable responses should be investigated together with the instrument's responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>FUNDES-Child-SE can be used to facilitate a discussion of participation and independence and to plan interventions in a habilitation setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2023.2237214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a need for an instrument to measure participation and independence in children with disabilities. FUNDES-Child-SE has its origin in the participation questionnaire Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation.

Aims: Test the psychometric properties of internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional study included caregivers of 163 children with disability aged 6-18 years, 59 of whom were also included in the test-retest study. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the proportions of valid ratings. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were tested through Cronbach's alpha and the intra-class correlation coefficient.

Results: The amount of not relevant/not applicable ratings was substantial but varied between items and subdomains. Internal consistency was acceptable (0.8-0.95), and the test-retest was marginal to excellent (0.73-0.95).

Conclusions: The reliability together with the content validity support the use of the FUNDES-Child-SE to measure participation and independence in children with disabilities. However, results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size and possible selection bias. Modifications to reduce the not relevant/not applicable responses should be investigated together with the instrument's responsiveness.

Significance: FUNDES-Child-SE can be used to facilitate a discussion of participation and independence and to plan interventions in a habilitation setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FUNDES-Child-SE的可靠性——衡量残疾儿童和青少年的参与和独立性。
背景:需要一种工具来衡量残疾儿童的参与和独立性。funds -Child- se起源于参与问卷《儿童与青少年参与量表》。目的:检验内部一致性和重测信度的心理测量特性。材料与方法:本横断面研究包括163名6-18岁残疾儿童的照顾者,其中59人也被纳入复试研究。描述性统计用于评估有效评分的比例。通过Cronbach’s alpha和类内相关系数检验内部一致性和重测信度。结果:不相关/不适用评分的数量很大,但在项目和子域之间有所不同。内部一致性可接受(0.8-0.95),重测为边缘至优(0.73-0.95)。结论:信度和内容效度支持使用FUNDES-Child-SE来衡量残疾儿童的参与和独立性。然而,由于样本量小和可能的选择偏差,结果应谨慎解释。应与仪器的响应性一起研究减少不相关/不适用响应的修改。意义:funds - child - se可用于促进参与和独立性的讨论,并计划在康复环境中的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Occupational therapy's oversight: How science veiled our humanity. Defining the future of occupational therapy: A concept analysis of leadership development. Fostering social participation among older adults: Perspectives of stakeholders. 'A new sense of my former self' - transforming the self through vocational rehabilitation for people with acquired brain injury. Psychometric properties of the arabic version of occupational value with pre-defined ítems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1