(A lack of) effects of acute social stress on attentional bias to threat

IF 2.1 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cpnec.2023.100195
Colton L. Hunter, Grant S. Shields
{"title":"(A lack of) effects of acute social stress on attentional bias to threat","authors":"Colton L. Hunter,&nbsp;Grant S. Shields","doi":"10.1016/j.cpnec.2023.100195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Attentional biases toward or away from emotionally evocative stimuli have been well documented and are known to be clinically relevant, making it important to understand how various factors contribute to them. Some work has suggested that acute stress modulates attentional biases, but this work has produced inconsistent results. For example, many studies have found that stress enhances attentional bias, others that stress decreases attentional bias, and others still that there is no effect of stress at all. Methodological differences may explain these inconsistencies. For example, discrepancies exist between studies in participant sex (e.g., mixed sample vs. all men) and in the type of attentional bias paradigm. We addressed these gaps by examining the effects of an acute social stressor (vs. control) on attentional bias assessed via facial dot probe, focusing on potential sex differences in these effects (<em>N</em> = 141). We found that, overall, participants were significantly biased towards threat, but biases did not differ by stress condition or sex. These findings help to clarify the existing discrepancy in the literature, as we found that stress exerts little if any effect on attentional bias assessed via a facial dot probe.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72656,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2e/f1/main.PMC10405195.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666497623000292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attentional biases toward or away from emotionally evocative stimuli have been well documented and are known to be clinically relevant, making it important to understand how various factors contribute to them. Some work has suggested that acute stress modulates attentional biases, but this work has produced inconsistent results. For example, many studies have found that stress enhances attentional bias, others that stress decreases attentional bias, and others still that there is no effect of stress at all. Methodological differences may explain these inconsistencies. For example, discrepancies exist between studies in participant sex (e.g., mixed sample vs. all men) and in the type of attentional bias paradigm. We addressed these gaps by examining the effects of an acute social stressor (vs. control) on attentional bias assessed via facial dot probe, focusing on potential sex differences in these effects (N = 141). We found that, overall, participants were significantly biased towards threat, but biases did not differ by stress condition or sex. These findings help to clarify the existing discrepancy in the literature, as we found that stress exerts little if any effect on attentional bias assessed via a facial dot probe.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(缺乏)严重的社会压力对威胁的注意偏向的影响
人们已经充分记录了对情绪唤起刺激的注意偏差,并且已知其与临床相关,因此了解各种因素是如何导致这些偏差的很重要。一些研究表明,急性压力会调节注意力偏差,但这项研究产生了不一致的结果。例如,许多研究发现压力会增强注意力偏差,其他研究则认为压力会降低注意力偏差,还有一些研究则认为根本没有压力的影响。方法上的差异可以解释这些不一致。例如,参与者性别的研究(例如,混合样本与所有男性的研究)和注意力偏差范式的类型之间存在差异。我们通过检查急性社会压力源(与对照)对通过面部点探针评估的注意力偏差的影响来解决这些差距,重点关注这些影响中的潜在性别差异(N=141)。我们发现,总体而言,参与者对威胁有显著的偏见,但偏见并没有因压力状况或性别而有所不同。这些发现有助于澄清文献中存在的差异,因为我们发现压力对通过面部点探针评估的注意力偏差几乎没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology
Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
期刊最新文献
Relationship between fluid intake, hydration status and cortisol dynamics in healthy, young adult males. Exploring stress and depressive symptoms in pregnancy and the IL-1β, IL-6, and C-reactive protein pathway: Looking for possible biomarker targets. Association between depression and anxiety disorders with euthyroid Hashimoto's thyroiditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. A Festschrift for Janice Kiecolt-Glaser: At the origin of stress and immunity. Experiences of participating in cortisol awakening response research: “I was more conscious than usual, I wanted to get it right”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1