Toward a Comprehensive, Data-Driven Model of American Political Goals: Recognizing the "Values" and "Vices" Within Both Liberalism and Conservativism.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1177/01461672231185484
Benjamin M Wilkowski, Emilio Rivera, Laverl Z Williamson, Erika DiMariano, Brian P Meier, Adam Fetterman
{"title":"Toward a Comprehensive, Data-Driven Model of American Political Goals: Recognizing the \"Values\" and \"Vices\" Within Both Liberalism and Conservativism.","authors":"Benjamin M Wilkowski, Emilio Rivera, Laverl Z Williamson, Erika DiMariano, Brian P Meier, Adam Fetterman","doi":"10.1177/01461672231185484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When a person indicates they are \"liberal\" or \"conservative,\" an important part of what they are communicating is their <i>goals</i> for how they would like society to be structured. However, past theories have described these goals in dramatically different fashions, suggesting that either conservativism or liberalism reflects a divisive or unifying goal. To help overcome this impasse, we systematically compared a broad, representative sample of all possible higher-order goals (drawn a previous lexical investigation of more than 1,000 goals) to the political ideology of American adults (total <i>n</i> = 1,588). The results of five studies suggested that proposals from competing theories are all partially correct. Conservativism simultaneously reflects the unifying \"value\" of Tradition, as well as the divisive \"vice\" of Elitism; while Liberalism simultaneously reflects the unifying \"value\" of Inclusiveness, and the divisive \"vice\" of Rebellion. These results help to integrate proposals from previous competing theories into a single framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"167-184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231185484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When a person indicates they are "liberal" or "conservative," an important part of what they are communicating is their goals for how they would like society to be structured. However, past theories have described these goals in dramatically different fashions, suggesting that either conservativism or liberalism reflects a divisive or unifying goal. To help overcome this impasse, we systematically compared a broad, representative sample of all possible higher-order goals (drawn a previous lexical investigation of more than 1,000 goals) to the political ideology of American adults (total n = 1,588). The results of five studies suggested that proposals from competing theories are all partially correct. Conservativism simultaneously reflects the unifying "value" of Tradition, as well as the divisive "vice" of Elitism; while Liberalism simultaneously reflects the unifying "value" of Inclusiveness, and the divisive "vice" of Rebellion. These results help to integrate proposals from previous competing theories into a single framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立以数据为导向的美国政治目标综合模型:认识自由主义和保守主义的 "价值观 "和 "恶习"。
当一个人表示自己是 "自由主义者 "或 "保守主义者 "时,他们所传达的一个重要信息就是他们希望社会如何构建的目标。然而,过去的理论对这些目标的描述大相径庭,认为保守主义或自由主义反映了分裂或统一的目标。为了打破这一僵局,我们系统地比较了所有可能的高阶目标的广泛而有代表性的样本(来自于之前对 1000 多个目标的词汇调查)和美国成年人的政治意识形态(总人数 = 1588)。五项研究的结果表明,相互竞争的理论所提出的建议都是部分正确的。保守主义同时反映了传统的统一 "价值 "和精英主义的分裂 "恶习";而自由主义同时反映了包容的统一 "价值 "和叛逆的分裂 "恶习"。这些结果有助于将以往相互竞争的理论所提出的建议整合到一个单一的框架中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
期刊最新文献
The "Partial Innocence" Effect: False Guilty Pleas to Partially Unethical Behaviors. A Growth Mindset Frame Increases Opting In to Reading Information About Bias. Investigating Cortisol in a STEM Classroom: The Association Between Cortisol and Academic Performance. Nostalgia Promotes Parents' Tradition Transfer to Children by Strengthening Parent-Child Relationship Closeness. The Profiles, Predictors, and Intergroup Outcomes of Cultural Attachment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1