Concordance of Intrinsic Brain Connectivity Measures Is Disrupted in Alzheimer's Disease.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1089/brain.2020.0918
Xiangliang Chen, Oezguer A Onur, Nils Richter, Ronja Fassbender, Hannes Gramespacher, Qumars Befahr, Boris von Reutern, Kim Dillen, Heidi I L Jacobs, Juraj Kukolja, Gereon R Fink, Julian Dronse
{"title":"Concordance of Intrinsic Brain Connectivity Measures Is Disrupted in Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Xiangliang Chen,&nbsp;Oezguer A Onur,&nbsp;Nils Richter,&nbsp;Ronja Fassbender,&nbsp;Hannes Gramespacher,&nbsp;Qumars Befahr,&nbsp;Boris von Reutern,&nbsp;Kim Dillen,&nbsp;Heidi I L Jacobs,&nbsp;Juraj Kukolja,&nbsp;Gereon R Fink,&nbsp;Julian Dronse","doi":"10.1089/brain.2020.0918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Recently, a new resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) measure to evaluate the concordance between different rs-fMRI metrics has been proposed and has not been investigated in Alzheimer's disease (AD). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> 3T rs-fMRI data were obtained from healthy young controls (YC, <i>n</i> = 26), healthy senior controls (SC, <i>n</i> = 29), and AD patients (<i>n</i> = 35). The fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and degree centrality (DC) were analyzed, followed by the calculation of their concordance using Kendall's W for each brain voxel across time. Group differences in the concordance were compared globally, within seven intrinsic brain networks, and on a voxel-by-voxel basis with covariates of age, sex, head motion, and gray matter volume. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The global concordance was lowest in AD among the three groups, with similar differences for the single metrics. When comparing AD to SC, reductions of concordance were detected in each of the investigated networks apart from the limbic network. For SC in comparison to YC, lower global concordance without any network-level difference was observed. Voxel-wise analyses revealed lower concordance in the right middle temporal gyrus in AD compared to SC and lower concordance in the left middle frontal gyrus in SC compared to YC. Lower fALFF were observed in the right angular gyrus in AD in comparison to SC, but ReHo and DC showed no group differences. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The concordance of resting-state measures differentiates AD from healthy aging and may represent a novel imaging marker in AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2020.0918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Recently, a new resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) measure to evaluate the concordance between different rs-fMRI metrics has been proposed and has not been investigated in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: 3T rs-fMRI data were obtained from healthy young controls (YC, n = 26), healthy senior controls (SC, n = 29), and AD patients (n = 35). The fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and degree centrality (DC) were analyzed, followed by the calculation of their concordance using Kendall's W for each brain voxel across time. Group differences in the concordance were compared globally, within seven intrinsic brain networks, and on a voxel-by-voxel basis with covariates of age, sex, head motion, and gray matter volume. Results: The global concordance was lowest in AD among the three groups, with similar differences for the single metrics. When comparing AD to SC, reductions of concordance were detected in each of the investigated networks apart from the limbic network. For SC in comparison to YC, lower global concordance without any network-level difference was observed. Voxel-wise analyses revealed lower concordance in the right middle temporal gyrus in AD compared to SC and lower concordance in the left middle frontal gyrus in SC compared to YC. Lower fALFF were observed in the right angular gyrus in AD in comparison to SC, but ReHo and DC showed no group differences. Conclusions: The concordance of resting-state measures differentiates AD from healthy aging and may represent a novel imaging marker in AD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在阿尔茨海默病中,内在脑连接测量的一致性被破坏。
背景:最近,一种新的静息状态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)测量方法被提出,用于评估不同rs-fMRI指标之间的一致性,但尚未在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中进行研究。方法:获取健康青年(YC, n = 26)、健康老年(SC, n = 29)和AD患者(n = 35)的3T - fmri数据。分析了低频波动的分数幅度(fALFF)、区域均匀性(ReHo)和度中心性(DC),然后使用Kendall's W计算每个脑体素的一致性。在7个内在脑网络中,在年龄、性别、头部运动和灰质体积等协变量的基础上,对一致性的组间差异进行了全局比较。结果:在三组中,AD的整体一致性最低,在单一指标上也有类似的差异。当比较AD和SC时,除了边缘网络外,在每个被调查的网络中都检测到一致性的降低。与YC相比,SC的整体一致性较低,但没有网络层面的差异。体素分析显示,AD患者的右侧颞中回一致性低于SC, SC患者的左侧额中回一致性低于YC。与SC相比,AD右角回的fALFF较低,但ReHo和DC无组间差异。结论:静息状态测量的一致性可将AD与健康衰老区分开来,并可能是AD的一种新的成像标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1