Predictors of Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Chest Pain Among Coronary Heart Disease Patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Clinical Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/10547738231184085
Mohammad Jamil Abdelhaq, Abedalmajeed Methqal Shajrawi, Samantha Ismaile, Ahmed Mohammad Al-Smadi, Hekmat Yousef Al-Akash, Ala Ashour, Anas Salah, Ahmad Mohammad Abu-Safia
{"title":"Predictors of Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Chest Pain Among Coronary Heart Disease Patients.","authors":"Mohammad Jamil Abdelhaq,&nbsp;Abedalmajeed Methqal Shajrawi,&nbsp;Samantha Ismaile,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohammad Al-Smadi,&nbsp;Hekmat Yousef Al-Akash,&nbsp;Ala Ashour,&nbsp;Anas Salah,&nbsp;Ahmad Mohammad Abu-Safia","doi":"10.1177/10547738231184085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure frequently suffer post-PCI chest pain (PPCP). This study aims to identify the changes in PPCP level and investigate the predictors of PPCP among patients with coronary heart disease at three measurement times: on admission (T1), 24 hours post-PCI (T2), and 30 days post-PCI (T3). A repeated-measure design was used. Significant differences were observed in PPCP levels between T1 and T2; between T2 and T3; and between T1 and T3. The predictors of PPCP are (1) high-intensity physical activities duration per week, (2) cardiac enzyme level upon admission, (3) increased ejection fraction, and (4) increased heart rate. The results highlight that identifying predictors of PPCP helps in determining high-risk patients, whereby evidence-based interventions can decrease readmission rates and reduce patient exposure to unnecessary investigations and procedures. More research is needed to explain the changes in PPCP level and to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738231184085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure frequently suffer post-PCI chest pain (PPCP). This study aims to identify the changes in PPCP level and investigate the predictors of PPCP among patients with coronary heart disease at three measurement times: on admission (T1), 24 hours post-PCI (T2), and 30 days post-PCI (T3). A repeated-measure design was used. Significant differences were observed in PPCP levels between T1 and T2; between T2 and T3; and between T1 and T3. The predictors of PPCP are (1) high-intensity physical activities duration per week, (2) cardiac enzyme level upon admission, (3) increased ejection fraction, and (4) increased heart rate. The results highlight that identifying predictors of PPCP helps in determining high-risk patients, whereby evidence-based interventions can decrease readmission rates and reduce patient exposure to unnecessary investigations and procedures. More research is needed to explain the changes in PPCP level and to confirm these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后胸痛的预测因素。
接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者经常出现PCI后胸痛(PPCP)。本研究旨在确定冠心病患者PPCP水平在入院时(T1)、pci后24小时(T2)和pci后30天(T3)三个测量时间的变化,并探讨PPCP水平的预测因素。采用重复测量设计。T1与T2间PPCP水平差异有统计学意义;T2与T3之间;在T1和T3之间。PPCP的预测因子为(1)每周高强度体力活动时间,(2)入院时心脏酶水平,(3)射血分数升高,(4)心率升高。结果强调,确定PPCP的预测因素有助于确定高危患者,因此循证干预可以降低再入院率,减少患者接受不必要的检查和程序。需要更多的研究来解释PPCP水平的变化并证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
107
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Implementing Resourcefulness Training© with Parent Caregivers of Children Dependent on Medical Technology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Frailty and Its Associated Factors in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Cross-Sectional Study. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Cultural Beliefs of Afghan Refugee Women Toward Gynecological Cancer: A Qualitative Study. Effect of Meaning-in-Life Interventions for Advanced Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Predicting Neutropenic Sepsis in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1