The relation between social media mentions and academic citations in orthodontic journals: A preliminary study

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.05.003
Dina G. Hassan , Maha El Tantawi , Mohamed G. Hassan
{"title":"The relation between social media mentions and academic citations in orthodontic journals: A preliminary study","authors":"Dina G. Hassan ,&nbsp;Maha El Tantawi ,&nbsp;Mohamed G. Hassan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To study the relation between social media mentions and academic citations for articles published in peer-reviewed orthodontic journals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Articles published in early 2018 in seven peer-reviewed orthodontic journals were retrospectively analyzed in September 2022. Citation counts of the articles were evaluated using two databases: Google Scholar (GS) and Web of Science (WoS). The Altmetric Attention Score, Twitter, Facebook mentions, and Mendeley reads were tracked using the Altmetric Bookmarklet. The citation counts and social media mentions were correlated using Spearman rho.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 84 articles were identified during the initial search; 64 (76%) were original studies and systematic review articles and included in the analysis. A total of 38% of the articles had at least one mention on social media. Over the study period, the average number of citations of the articles mentioned on social media was higher than the non-mentioned articles for GS and WoS, respectively. Moreover, significant positive correlations existed between the Altmetric Attention Score and the number of citations in GS and WoS (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.31, <em>P</em> = 0.001 and r<sub>s</sub> = 0.26, <em>P</em> = 0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Social media mentions and citations of articles published in peer-reviewed orthodontic journals are correlated, with a clear difference in the number of citations in articles mentioned on social media versus those not mentioned, indicating possible increased reach of articles disseminated on social media.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 125-130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212443823000395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background

To study the relation between social media mentions and academic citations for articles published in peer-reviewed orthodontic journals.

Methods

Articles published in early 2018 in seven peer-reviewed orthodontic journals were retrospectively analyzed in September 2022. Citation counts of the articles were evaluated using two databases: Google Scholar (GS) and Web of Science (WoS). The Altmetric Attention Score, Twitter, Facebook mentions, and Mendeley reads were tracked using the Altmetric Bookmarklet. The citation counts and social media mentions were correlated using Spearman rho.

Results

A total of 84 articles were identified during the initial search; 64 (76%) were original studies and systematic review articles and included in the analysis. A total of 38% of the articles had at least one mention on social media. Over the study period, the average number of citations of the articles mentioned on social media was higher than the non-mentioned articles for GS and WoS, respectively. Moreover, significant positive correlations existed between the Altmetric Attention Score and the number of citations in GS and WoS (rs = 0.31, P = 0.001 and rs = 0.26, P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Social media mentions and citations of articles published in peer-reviewed orthodontic journals are correlated, with a clear difference in the number of citations in articles mentioned on social media versus those not mentioned, indicating possible increased reach of articles disseminated on social media.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体提及与正畸期刊学术引文的关系初探
背景研究在同行评审的正畸杂志上发表的文章在社交媒体上的提及与学术引文之间的关系。方法回顾性分析2022年9月发表在7份同行评审的正畸期刊上的2018年初的文章。使用两个数据库:Google Scholar(GS)和Web of Science(WoS)对这些文章的引用计数进行评估。使用Altmetric Bookmarklet跟踪Altmetric注意力得分、推特、脸书提及次数和Mendeley阅读次数。引用次数和社交媒体提及次数使用Spearman rho进行关联。结果初步检索共发现84篇文章;64篇(76%)为原始研究和系统综述文章,纳入分析。共有38%的文章在社交媒体上至少提到过一次。在研究期间,GS和WoS在社交媒体上提及的文章的平均引用次数分别高于未提及的文章。此外,高度注意评分与GS和WoS的引用次数呈正相关(rs=0.31,P=0.001和rs=0.26,P=0.04),社交媒体上提及的文章与未提及的文章的引用次数存在明显差异,这表明社交媒体上传播的文章可能会扩大覆盖面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Microplastics and orthodontic aligners: The concerns arising from the modernization of practice through polymers and plastics. Assessment of coated orthodontic miniscrews with chlorhexidine hexametaphosphate antimicrobial nanoparticles: A randomized clinical trial. Protraction of a mandibular second molar into the adjacent atrophic first-molar extraction site with ridge-split technique through clear aligners: A case report. Automated dentition segmentation: 3D UNet-based approach with MIScnn framework. In vitro physical properties and clinical stability of reused orthodontic miniscrews: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1