Indications for carotid Doppler ultrasound in asymptomatic patients - are we ordering it correctly?

IF 0.8 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Jornal Vascular Brasileiro Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1677-5449.202200841
Alcides Alves da Silva, André Brusamolin Moro, Jeferson Freitas Toregeani
{"title":"Indications for carotid Doppler ultrasound in asymptomatic patients - are we ordering it correctly?","authors":"Alcides Alves da Silva,&nbsp;André Brusamolin Moro,&nbsp;Jeferson Freitas Toregeani","doi":"10.1590/1677-5449.202200841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carotid arteries are frequently the site of pathologies, the most common being atherosclerosis, which may result in the formation of plaques, causing stenosis. Doppler ultrasound is currently the exam of choice for assessment of the carotid arteries in asymptomatic patients to screen for and diagnose vascular lesions. Current guidelines recommend screening patients who have risk factors for carotid stenosis and who are able and willing to undergo medical treatment and/or carotid intervention. Screening asymptomatic patients in the general adult population who have no significant risk factors is not recommended.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether medical experts rely on the literature to request Doppler ultrasound for screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective selection of patients was performed based on requests for carotid ultrasound. The data collected were computed and analyzed using RStudio version 1.3.959.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The request was evaluated as appropriate as long as the patients presented at least one risk factor for carotid plaques. Fifty-five out of 152 patients met criteria for carotid screening. The most frequent indication in the study population was vascular check-up. Arterial hypertension was the most prevalent risk factor. Vascular surgery specialists were more likely to order the exam correctly (odds ratio for correct indications: 3.52 [CI 1.14 - 10.87], with p=0.02). The rate of correct Doppler ultrasound requests was 36% (95%CI 29 to 42%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An excess of requests for carotid ultrasound screening was found in this study. Vascular surgeons more often requested the test correctly.</p>","PeriodicalId":14814,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Vascular Brasileiro","volume":"22 ","pages":"e20220084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Vascular Brasileiro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.202200841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carotid arteries are frequently the site of pathologies, the most common being atherosclerosis, which may result in the formation of plaques, causing stenosis. Doppler ultrasound is currently the exam of choice for assessment of the carotid arteries in asymptomatic patients to screen for and diagnose vascular lesions. Current guidelines recommend screening patients who have risk factors for carotid stenosis and who are able and willing to undergo medical treatment and/or carotid intervention. Screening asymptomatic patients in the general adult population who have no significant risk factors is not recommended.

Objectives: To assess whether medical experts rely on the literature to request Doppler ultrasound for screening.

Methods: A retrospective selection of patients was performed based on requests for carotid ultrasound. The data collected were computed and analyzed using RStudio version 1.3.959.

Results: The request was evaluated as appropriate as long as the patients presented at least one risk factor for carotid plaques. Fifty-five out of 152 patients met criteria for carotid screening. The most frequent indication in the study population was vascular check-up. Arterial hypertension was the most prevalent risk factor. Vascular surgery specialists were more likely to order the exam correctly (odds ratio for correct indications: 3.52 [CI 1.14 - 10.87], with p=0.02). The rate of correct Doppler ultrasound requests was 36% (95%CI 29 to 42%).

Conclusions: An excess of requests for carotid ultrasound screening was found in this study. Vascular surgeons more often requested the test correctly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无症状患者颈动脉多普勒超声的适应症-我们的安排是否正确?
背景:颈动脉经常是病变的部位,最常见的是动脉粥样硬化,这可能导致斑块的形成,导致狭窄。多普勒超声是目前评估无症状患者颈动脉的首选检查,用于筛查和诊断血管病变。目前的指南建议筛查有颈动脉狭窄危险因素且能够并愿意接受药物治疗和/或颈动脉干预的患者。不建议在没有显著危险因素的普通成人人群中筛查无症状患者。目的:评估医学专家是否依赖文献要求多普勒超声进行筛查。方法:根据要求进行颈动脉超声检查的患者进行回顾性选择。使用RStudio 1.3.959版本对收集到的数据进行计算和分析。结果:只要患者出现至少一种颈动脉斑块的危险因素,该请求就被评估为合适。152例患者中有55例符合颈动脉筛查标准。研究人群中最常见的指征是血管检查。动脉高血压是最普遍的危险因素。血管外科专家更有可能正确安排检查(正确指征的优势比:3.52 [CI 1.14 - 10.87], p=0.02)。正确的多普勒超声诊断率为36% (95%CI 29 ~ 42%)。结论:本研究发现颈动脉超声筛查的请求过多。血管外科医生更经常要求正确的检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Jornal Vascular Brasileiro is editated and published quaterly to select and disseminate high-quality scientific contents concerning original research, novel surgical and diagnostic techniques, and clinical observations in the field of vascular surgery, angiology, and endovascular surgery. Its abbreviated title is J. Vasc. Bras., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Cross-sectional, multicenter study comparing sex differences in patients undergoing endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from the São Paulo State University Provincial Hospitals Registry (RHEUNI). Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines on peripheral artery disease. Analysis of the efficacy of endovascular treatment with foam sclerotherapy for pelvic congestion syndrome with ultrasound assessment. Treatment of penetrating injuries of the retrohepatic vena cava: systematic review protocol. Response to 1064 nm Nd:YAG LASER in treatment of vulvar Fordyce's Angiokeratoma: case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1