Specialist dementia nursing models and impacts: a systematic review.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Current Opinion in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000874
Pat Brown, Alexandra Burton, Jordan Ayden, Karen Harrison Dening, Juanita Hoe, Claudia Cooper
{"title":"Specialist dementia nursing models and impacts: a systematic review.","authors":"Pat Brown, Alexandra Burton, Jordan Ayden, Karen Harrison Dening, Juanita Hoe, Claudia Cooper","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Dementia policy priorities recommend that people who are living with dementia and their family should have access to support and interventions delivered by dementia specialists, including specialist nurses. However, specialist dementia nursing models and role-related competencies are not clearly defined. We systematically review the current evidence regarding specialist dementia nursing models and their impacts.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Thirty-one studies from across three databases, and grey literature were included in the review. One framework defining specific specialist dementia nursing competencies was found. We did not find convincing evidence of the effectiveness of specialist nursing dementia services, relative to standard models of care from the current, limited evidence base, although families living with dementia valued it. No Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) has compared the impact of specialist nursing on client and carer outcomes relative to less specialist care, although one nonrandomised study reported that specialist dementia nursing reduces emergency and inpatient service use compared with a usual care group.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Current models of specialist dementia nursing are numerous and heterogeneous. Further exploration of the specialist nursing skills and the impact of specialist nursing interventions is needed to usefully inform workforce development strategies and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":"36 5","pages":"376-390"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000874","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Dementia policy priorities recommend that people who are living with dementia and their family should have access to support and interventions delivered by dementia specialists, including specialist nurses. However, specialist dementia nursing models and role-related competencies are not clearly defined. We systematically review the current evidence regarding specialist dementia nursing models and their impacts.

Recent findings: Thirty-one studies from across three databases, and grey literature were included in the review. One framework defining specific specialist dementia nursing competencies was found. We did not find convincing evidence of the effectiveness of specialist nursing dementia services, relative to standard models of care from the current, limited evidence base, although families living with dementia valued it. No Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) has compared the impact of specialist nursing on client and carer outcomes relative to less specialist care, although one nonrandomised study reported that specialist dementia nursing reduces emergency and inpatient service use compared with a usual care group.

Summary: Current models of specialist dementia nursing are numerous and heterogeneous. Further exploration of the specialist nursing skills and the impact of specialist nursing interventions is needed to usefully inform workforce development strategies and clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症专科护理模式及其影响:系统综述。
审查目的:痴呆症政策优先事项建议,痴呆症患者及其家人应获得由痴呆症专家(包括专科护士)提供的支持和干预。然而,痴呆症专科护理模式和与角色相关的能力并未得到明确界定。我们系统地回顾了目前有关痴呆症专科护理模式及其影响的证据:综述包括来自三个数据库的 31 项研究和灰色文献。我们发现了一个定义具体痴呆症专科护理能力的框架。在目前有限的证据基础上,我们没有找到令人信服的证据来证明痴呆症专科护理服务相对于标准护理模式的有效性,尽管痴呆症患者家庭非常重视这种服务。尽管一项非随机研究报告称,与常规护理组相比,痴呆症专科护理减少了急诊和住院服务的使用,但目前还没有随机对照试验(RCT)比较过专科护理对患者和照护者疗效的影响。需要进一步探讨专科护理技能和专科护理干预措施的影响,以便为劳动力发展战略和临床实践提供有用信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Mortality in people with mental disorders in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide, register-based cohort study. Early intervention for eating disorders. Effectiveness and predictors of psychotherapy in eating disorders: state-of-the-art and future directions. Systematic review of the epidemiology of eating disorders in the Arab world. Eating disorders: etiology, risk factors, and suggestions for prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1