The scientific character of psychoanalysis: Freud in the current discussion

Daniel Leserre
{"title":"The scientific character of psychoanalysis: Freud in the current discussion","authors":"Daniel Leserre","doi":"10.53680/vertex.v34i160.464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discussion on the scientific character of psychoanalysis is continuous and multifaceted. Nowadays the extent and variety of the implied aspects in it is even increased. In this context this article presents for its analysis and assessment a reconsideration of Freud’s line of argument regarding the scientific character of psychoanalysis. Against a quite spread view that conceives Freud’s scientific perspective as a reflex of general traits of his time such as positivism, sustained by recent research on Freud this article proposes the reconsideration of Freud’s perspective in a more exhaustive and\nnuanced way and holds that it is based on a composed by integrated parts, unified and consistent line of argument maintained through all his work. The reconsideration of the design of Freud’s argument allows to hold that his own formulation is still fruitful and suitable for the present, particularly as it possibilitates, justifies and requires the connection of psychoanalysis to the development of knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":75297,"journal":{"name":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","volume":"34 160, abr.-jun.","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v34i160.464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The discussion on the scientific character of psychoanalysis is continuous and multifaceted. Nowadays the extent and variety of the implied aspects in it is even increased. In this context this article presents for its analysis and assessment a reconsideration of Freud’s line of argument regarding the scientific character of psychoanalysis. Against a quite spread view that conceives Freud’s scientific perspective as a reflex of general traits of his time such as positivism, sustained by recent research on Freud this article proposes the reconsideration of Freud’s perspective in a more exhaustive and nuanced way and holds that it is based on a composed by integrated parts, unified and consistent line of argument maintained through all his work. The reconsideration of the design of Freud’s argument allows to hold that his own formulation is still fruitful and suitable for the present, particularly as it possibilitates, justifies and requires the connection of psychoanalysis to the development of knowledge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分析的科学特征:弗洛伊德在当前讨论中的地位
关于精神分析的科学性的讨论是连续的和多方面的。如今,其隐含方面的范围和种类甚至有所增加。在这种背景下,本文提出了对弗洛伊德关于精神分析的科学特征的论点的重新考虑,以进行分析和评估。一种相当普遍的观点认为弗洛伊德的科学观点是他那个时代的一般特征的反映,比如实证主义,最近对弗洛伊德的研究支持了这一观点,本文提出以一种更详尽和细致的方式重新考虑弗洛伊德的观点,并认为它是基于一个由集成部分组成的,统一的和一致的论点线,贯穿他所有的工作。重新考虑弗洛伊德论证的设计,可以认为他自己的公式仍然是富有成效的,适合于现在,特别是因为它可能,证明并要求精神分析与知识发展的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptación y desempeño psicométrico de la Escala de tormento físico y emocional hacia animales. Alta frecuencia de vulnerabilidad psicológica de población transgénero consultante a un hospital público de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Causas de abandono de un tratamiento ambulatorio intensivo por Trastorno por uso de sustancias. Perspectiva hacia el diseño de programas. Demencia con Cuerpos de Lewy y Afasias progresivas primarias: criterios diagnósticos actuales. Editorial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1