Susan Arndt, Thomas Wesarg, Antje Aschendorff, Iva Speck, Thomas Hocke, Till Fabian Jakob, Ann-Kathrin Rauch
{"title":"[经皮部分植入式骨导听力系统 Osia® 的言语理解能力预测。德文版]。","authors":"Susan Arndt, Thomas Wesarg, Antje Aschendorff, Iva Speck, Thomas Hocke, Till Fabian Jakob, Ann-Kathrin Rauch","doi":"10.1007/s00106-023-01336-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The active transcutaneous, partially implantable osseointegrated bone conduction system Cochlear™ Osia® (Cochlear, Sydney, Australia) has been approved for use in German-speaking countries since April 2021. The Osia is indicated for patients with conductive (CHL) or mixed hearing loss (MHL) with an average bone conduction (BC) hearing loss of 55 dB or less, or with single-sided deafness (SSD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the prediction of postoperative speech recognition with Osia and to evaluate the speech recognition of patients with MHL and an aided dynamic range of less than 30 dB with Osia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between 2017 and 2022, 29 adult patients were fitted with the Osia, 10 patients (11 ears) with CHL and 19 patients (21 ears) with MHL. MHL was subdivided into two groups: MHL‑I with four-frequency pure-tone average in BC (BC-4PTA) ≥ 20 dB HL and < 40 dB HL (n = 15 patients; 20 ears) vs. MHL-II with BC-4PTA ≥ 40 dB HL (n = 4 patients; 5 ears). All patients tested a bone conduction hearing device on a softband preoperatively. Speech intelligibility in quiet was assessed preoperatively using the Freiburg monosyllabic test unaided and with the test system and postoperatively with Osia. The maximum monosyllabic score (mEV) unaided and the monosyllabic score with the test system at 65 dB SPL were correlated with the postoperative monosyllabic score with Osia at 65 dB SPL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative prediction of postoperative outcome with Osia was better using the mEV than the EV at 65 dB SPL with the test device on the softband. Postoperative EV was most predictive for patients with CHL and least predictive for patients with mixed hearing loss with 4PTA BC ≥ 40 dB HL. For the test device at softband, results tended to show the minimum achievable outcome and the mEV tended to predict the realistically achievable outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Osia can be used for the treatment of CHL and MHL within the indication limits. The average preoperative bone conduction hearing threshold also provides an approximate estimate of the postoperative EV with Osia, for which the most accurate prediction is obtained using the preoperative mEV. Prediction accuracy decreases from a BC-4PTA of ≥ 40 dB.</p>","PeriodicalId":55052,"journal":{"name":"Hno","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11266205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Prediction of speech understanding with the transcutaneous partially implantable bone conduction hearing system Osia®. German Version].\",\"authors\":\"Susan Arndt, Thomas Wesarg, Antje Aschendorff, Iva Speck, Thomas Hocke, Till Fabian Jakob, Ann-Kathrin Rauch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00106-023-01336-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The active transcutaneous, partially implantable osseointegrated bone conduction system Cochlear™ Osia® (Cochlear, Sydney, Australia) has been approved for use in German-speaking countries since April 2021. The Osia is indicated for patients with conductive (CHL) or mixed hearing loss (MHL) with an average bone conduction (BC) hearing loss of 55 dB or less, or with single-sided deafness (SSD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the prediction of postoperative speech recognition with Osia and to evaluate the speech recognition of patients with MHL and an aided dynamic range of less than 30 dB with Osia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between 2017 and 2022, 29 adult patients were fitted with the Osia, 10 patients (11 ears) with CHL and 19 patients (21 ears) with MHL. MHL was subdivided into two groups: MHL‑I with four-frequency pure-tone average in BC (BC-4PTA) ≥ 20 dB HL and < 40 dB HL (n = 15 patients; 20 ears) vs. MHL-II with BC-4PTA ≥ 40 dB HL (n = 4 patients; 5 ears). All patients tested a bone conduction hearing device on a softband preoperatively. Speech intelligibility in quiet was assessed preoperatively using the Freiburg monosyllabic test unaided and with the test system and postoperatively with Osia. The maximum monosyllabic score (mEV) unaided and the monosyllabic score with the test system at 65 dB SPL were correlated with the postoperative monosyllabic score with Osia at 65 dB SPL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative prediction of postoperative outcome with Osia was better using the mEV than the EV at 65 dB SPL with the test device on the softband. Postoperative EV was most predictive for patients with CHL and least predictive for patients with mixed hearing loss with 4PTA BC ≥ 40 dB HL. For the test device at softband, results tended to show the minimum achievable outcome and the mEV tended to predict the realistically achievable outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Osia can be used for the treatment of CHL and MHL within the indication limits. The average preoperative bone conduction hearing threshold also provides an approximate estimate of the postoperative EV with Osia, for which the most accurate prediction is obtained using the preoperative mEV. Prediction accuracy decreases from a BC-4PTA of ≥ 40 dB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hno\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11266205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hno\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-023-01336-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hno","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-023-01336-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:自 2021 年 4 月起,有源经皮部分植入式骨整合骨传导系统 Cochlear™ Osia®(科利耳公司,澳大利亚悉尼)已获准在德语国家使用。Osia 适用于传导性听力损失(CHL)或混合性听力损失(MHL)患者,平均骨导听力损失(BC)不超过 55 分贝,或单侧耳聋(SSD)患者:这项回顾性研究的目的是调查 Osia 对术后语音识别能力的预测,并评估 MHL 患者的语音识别能力,以及 Osia 的辅助动态范围小于 30 dB:2017年至2022年间,29名成年患者安装了Osia,其中10名患者(11耳)患有CHL,19名患者(21耳)患有MHL。MHL 又分为两组:MHL-I组:BC四频纯音平均值(BC-4PTA)≥ 20 dB HL;MHL-II组:BC四频纯音平均值≥ 20 dB HL:使用 mEV 预测 Osia 术后结果的术前效果优于使用软带测试设备在 65 dB SPL 下的 EV 预测效果。术后 EV 对 CHL 患者的预测性最高,而对 4PTA BC ≥ 40 dB HL 的混合性听力损失患者的预测性最低。对于软带测试设备,结果倾向于显示最小可实现的结果,而 mEV 则倾向于预测实际可实现的结果:结论:在适应症范围内,Osia 可用于治疗 CHL 和 MHL。术前骨传导听阈的平均值也能大致估算出使用 Osia 的术后 EV 值,而使用术前 mEV 则能获得最准确的预测。BC-4PTA ≥ 40 dB 时,预测准确度会降低。
[Prediction of speech understanding with the transcutaneous partially implantable bone conduction hearing system Osia®. German Version].
Background: The active transcutaneous, partially implantable osseointegrated bone conduction system Cochlear™ Osia® (Cochlear, Sydney, Australia) has been approved for use in German-speaking countries since April 2021. The Osia is indicated for patients with conductive (CHL) or mixed hearing loss (MHL) with an average bone conduction (BC) hearing loss of 55 dB or less, or with single-sided deafness (SSD).
Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the prediction of postoperative speech recognition with Osia and to evaluate the speech recognition of patients with MHL and an aided dynamic range of less than 30 dB with Osia.
Materials and methods: Between 2017 and 2022, 29 adult patients were fitted with the Osia, 10 patients (11 ears) with CHL and 19 patients (21 ears) with MHL. MHL was subdivided into two groups: MHL‑I with four-frequency pure-tone average in BC (BC-4PTA) ≥ 20 dB HL and < 40 dB HL (n = 15 patients; 20 ears) vs. MHL-II with BC-4PTA ≥ 40 dB HL (n = 4 patients; 5 ears). All patients tested a bone conduction hearing device on a softband preoperatively. Speech intelligibility in quiet was assessed preoperatively using the Freiburg monosyllabic test unaided and with the test system and postoperatively with Osia. The maximum monosyllabic score (mEV) unaided and the monosyllabic score with the test system at 65 dB SPL were correlated with the postoperative monosyllabic score with Osia at 65 dB SPL.
Results: Preoperative prediction of postoperative outcome with Osia was better using the mEV than the EV at 65 dB SPL with the test device on the softband. Postoperative EV was most predictive for patients with CHL and least predictive for patients with mixed hearing loss with 4PTA BC ≥ 40 dB HL. For the test device at softband, results tended to show the minimum achievable outcome and the mEV tended to predict the realistically achievable outcome.
Conclusion: Osia can be used for the treatment of CHL and MHL within the indication limits. The average preoperative bone conduction hearing threshold also provides an approximate estimate of the postoperative EV with Osia, for which the most accurate prediction is obtained using the preoperative mEV. Prediction accuracy decreases from a BC-4PTA of ≥ 40 dB.
期刊介绍:
HNO is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all ENT specialists in practices and clinics dealing with all aspects of ENT medicine, e.g. prevention, diagnostic methods, complication management, modern therapy strategies and surgical procedures.
Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of ENT medicine.
Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange.
Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.