摩梭人的市场一体化、收入不平等与亲属制度。

IF 2.2 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Evolutionary Human Sciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ehs.2022.52
Siobhán M Mattison, Neil MacLaren, Chun-Yi Sum, Peter M Mattison, Ruizhe Liu, Mary K Shenk, Tami Blumenfield, Mingjie Su, Hui Li, Katherine Wander
{"title":"摩梭人的市场一体化、收入不平等与亲属制度。","authors":"Siobhán M Mattison,&nbsp;Neil MacLaren,&nbsp;Chun-Yi Sum,&nbsp;Peter M Mattison,&nbsp;Ruizhe Liu,&nbsp;Mary K Shenk,&nbsp;Tami Blumenfield,&nbsp;Mingjie Su,&nbsp;Hui Li,&nbsp;Katherine Wander","doi":"10.1017/ehs.2022.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increased access to defensible material wealth is hypothesised to escalate inequality. Market integration, which creates novel opportunities in cash economies, provides a means of testing this hypothesis. Using demographic data collected from 505 households among the matrilineal and patrilineal Mosuo in 2017, we test whether market integration is associated with increased material wealth, whether increased material wealth is associated with wealth inequality, and whether being in a matrilineal vs. patrilineal kinship system alters the relationship between wealth and inequality. We find evidence that market integration, measured as distance to the nearest source of tourism and primary source of household income, is associated with increased household income and 'modern' asset value. Both village-level market integration and mean asset value were associated negatively, rather than positively, with inequality, contrary to predictions. Finally, income, modern wealth and inequality were higher in matrilineal communities that were located closer to the centre of tourism and where tourism has long provided a relatively stable source of income. However, we also observed exacerbated inequality with increasing farm animal value in patriliny. We conclude that the forces affecting wealth and inequality depend on local context and that the importance of local institutions is obscured by aggregate statistics drawn from modern nation states.</p>","PeriodicalId":36414,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","volume":"5 ","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426023/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market integration, income inequality, and kinship system among the Mosuo of China.\",\"authors\":\"Siobhán M Mattison,&nbsp;Neil MacLaren,&nbsp;Chun-Yi Sum,&nbsp;Peter M Mattison,&nbsp;Ruizhe Liu,&nbsp;Mary K Shenk,&nbsp;Tami Blumenfield,&nbsp;Mingjie Su,&nbsp;Hui Li,&nbsp;Katherine Wander\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ehs.2022.52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Increased access to defensible material wealth is hypothesised to escalate inequality. Market integration, which creates novel opportunities in cash economies, provides a means of testing this hypothesis. Using demographic data collected from 505 households among the matrilineal and patrilineal Mosuo in 2017, we test whether market integration is associated with increased material wealth, whether increased material wealth is associated with wealth inequality, and whether being in a matrilineal vs. patrilineal kinship system alters the relationship between wealth and inequality. We find evidence that market integration, measured as distance to the nearest source of tourism and primary source of household income, is associated with increased household income and 'modern' asset value. Both village-level market integration and mean asset value were associated negatively, rather than positively, with inequality, contrary to predictions. Finally, income, modern wealth and inequality were higher in matrilineal communities that were located closer to the centre of tourism and where tourism has long provided a relatively stable source of income. However, we also observed exacerbated inequality with increasing farm animal value in patriliny. We conclude that the forces affecting wealth and inequality depend on local context and that the importance of local institutions is obscured by aggregate statistics drawn from modern nation states.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolutionary Human Sciences\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"e4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426023/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolutionary Human Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

人们假设,获得可防御物质财富的机会增加会加剧不平等。市场一体化在现金经济中创造了新的机会,为检验这一假设提供了一种手段。本文利用2017年收集的505户摩梭人母系和父系家庭的人口统计数据,检验了市场一体化是否与物质财富增加有关,物质财富增加是否与财富不平等有关,以及母系与父系亲属制度是否改变了财富与不平等之间的关系。我们发现有证据表明,市场一体化(以与最近的旅游来源和家庭收入主要来源的距离来衡量)与家庭收入和“现代”资产价值的增加有关。与预测相反,村级市场一体化和平均资产价值都与不平等呈负相关,而不是正相关。最后,在靠近旅游业中心的母系社区,收入、现代财富和不平等程度更高,旅游业长期以来提供了相对稳定的收入来源。然而,我们也观察到,随着父权制中农场动物价值的增加,不平等加剧。我们得出的结论是,影响财富和不平等的力量取决于当地环境,而当地制度的重要性被来自现代民族国家的总体统计数据所掩盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Market integration, income inequality, and kinship system among the Mosuo of China.

Increased access to defensible material wealth is hypothesised to escalate inequality. Market integration, which creates novel opportunities in cash economies, provides a means of testing this hypothesis. Using demographic data collected from 505 households among the matrilineal and patrilineal Mosuo in 2017, we test whether market integration is associated with increased material wealth, whether increased material wealth is associated with wealth inequality, and whether being in a matrilineal vs. patrilineal kinship system alters the relationship between wealth and inequality. We find evidence that market integration, measured as distance to the nearest source of tourism and primary source of household income, is associated with increased household income and 'modern' asset value. Both village-level market integration and mean asset value were associated negatively, rather than positively, with inequality, contrary to predictions. Finally, income, modern wealth and inequality were higher in matrilineal communities that were located closer to the centre of tourism and where tourism has long provided a relatively stable source of income. However, we also observed exacerbated inequality with increasing farm animal value in patriliny. We conclude that the forces affecting wealth and inequality depend on local context and that the importance of local institutions is obscured by aggregate statistics drawn from modern nation states.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Human Sciences
Evolutionary Human Sciences Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Coevolution of norm psychology and cooperation through exapted conformity. Salience of infectious diseases did not increase xenophobia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Testing the expensive-tissue hypothesis' prediction of inter-tissue competition using causal modelling with latent variables. Kin selection as a modulator of human handedness: sex-specific, parental and parent-of-origin effects. The role of mating effort and co-residence history in step-grandparental investment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1