代谢肿瘤参数补充临床病理因素在预后晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤。

Ashish Mohite, Venkatesh Rangarajan, Jayant Goda, Swati Chugh, Archi Agrawal, Manju Sengar
{"title":"代谢肿瘤参数补充临床病理因素在预后晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤。","authors":"Ashish Mohite,&nbsp;Venkatesh Rangarajan,&nbsp;Jayant Goda,&nbsp;Swati Chugh,&nbsp;Archi Agrawal,&nbsp;Manju Sengar","doi":"10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.69260.1482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma has a higher probability of relapse and recurrence. Classical clinicopathological parameters including the International Prognostic Score (IPS) have not been reliable in predicting prognosis or tailoring treatment. Since FDG PET/CT is the standard of care in staging Hodgkin Lymphoma, this study attempted to evaluate the clinical utility of baseline metabolic tumor parameters in a cohort of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III and IV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Histology-proven advanced Hodgkin Patients presenting to our institute between 2012-2016 and treated with chemo-radiotherapy (ABVD / AEVD) were followed up till 2019. Quantitative PET/CT and clinicopathological parameters were used to estimate the Event Free Survival (EFS) in 100 patients. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to compare the survival times of prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 48.83 months (IQR:33.31-63.05 months), the five-year-EFS was 81%. Of the 100 patients, 16 had relapsed (16%) and none died at the last follow-up. On Univariate analysis, among non-PET parameters bulky disease (P=0.03) and B-symptoms (P=0.04) were significant while among PET/CT parameters SUV<sub>max</sub> (p=0.001), SUV<sub>mean</sub> (P=0.002), WBMTV2.5 (P<0.001), WBMTV41% (P<0.001), WBTLG2.5 (P<0.001) and WBTLG41% (P <0.001) predicted poorer EFS. 5-year EFS for patients with low WBMTV2.5 [<1038.3 cm3] was 89% and 35% for patients with high WBMTV2.5 [≥1038.3 cm3] (p <0.001). In a multivariate model, only WBMTV2.5 (P=0.03) independently predicted poorer EFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PET-based metabolic parameter (WBMTV2.5) was able to prognosticate and complement the classical clinical prognostic factors in advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma. This parameter could have a surrogate value for prognosticating advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Better prognostication at baseline translates to tailored or risk-modified treatment and hence higher survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metabolic tumor parameters complement clinicopathological factors in prognosticating advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Ashish Mohite,&nbsp;Venkatesh Rangarajan,&nbsp;Jayant Goda,&nbsp;Swati Chugh,&nbsp;Archi Agrawal,&nbsp;Manju Sengar\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.69260.1482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma has a higher probability of relapse and recurrence. Classical clinicopathological parameters including the International Prognostic Score (IPS) have not been reliable in predicting prognosis or tailoring treatment. Since FDG PET/CT is the standard of care in staging Hodgkin Lymphoma, this study attempted to evaluate the clinical utility of baseline metabolic tumor parameters in a cohort of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III and IV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Histology-proven advanced Hodgkin Patients presenting to our institute between 2012-2016 and treated with chemo-radiotherapy (ABVD / AEVD) were followed up till 2019. Quantitative PET/CT and clinicopathological parameters were used to estimate the Event Free Survival (EFS) in 100 patients. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to compare the survival times of prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 48.83 months (IQR:33.31-63.05 months), the five-year-EFS was 81%. Of the 100 patients, 16 had relapsed (16%) and none died at the last follow-up. On Univariate analysis, among non-PET parameters bulky disease (P=0.03) and B-symptoms (P=0.04) were significant while among PET/CT parameters SUV<sub>max</sub> (p=0.001), SUV<sub>mean</sub> (P=0.002), WBMTV2.5 (P<0.001), WBMTV41% (P<0.001), WBTLG2.5 (P<0.001) and WBTLG41% (P <0.001) predicted poorer EFS. 5-year EFS for patients with low WBMTV2.5 [<1038.3 cm3] was 89% and 35% for patients with high WBMTV2.5 [≥1038.3 cm3] (p <0.001). In a multivariate model, only WBMTV2.5 (P=0.03) independently predicted poorer EFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PET-based metabolic parameter (WBMTV2.5) was able to prognosticate and complement the classical clinical prognostic factors in advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma. This parameter could have a surrogate value for prognosticating advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Better prognostication at baseline translates to tailored or risk-modified treatment and hence higher survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261693/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.69260.1482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.69260.1482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤具有较高的复发和复发概率。包括国际预后评分(IPS)在内的经典临床病理参数在预测预后或定制治疗方面并不可靠。由于FDG PET/CT是霍奇金淋巴瘤分期的标准护理,本研究试图评估基线代谢肿瘤参数在晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤(III期和IV期)队列中的临床应用。方法:2012-2016年期间,组织学证实的晚期霍奇金患者在我们研究所接受化疗放疗(ABVD / AEVD)治疗,随访至2019年。采用定量PET/CT和临床病理参数估计100例患者的无事件生存期(EFS)。采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验比较预后因素的生存时间。结果:中位随访48.83个月(IQR:33.31-63.05个月),5年efs为81%。在100例患者中,16例复发(16%),最后一次随访时无患者死亡。在单因素分析中,在非PET参数中,体积病(P=0.03)和b症状(P=0.04)显著,而在PET/CT参数中,SUVmax (P= 0.001)、SUVmean (P=0.002)、WBMTV2.5 (P)显著。结论:基于PET的代谢参数(WBMTV2.5)能够预测并补充晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤的经典临床预后因素。该参数可作为预测晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤的替代值。基线时更好的预后转化为量身定制或风险调整治疗,从而提高生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Metabolic tumor parameters complement clinicopathological factors in prognosticating advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Objectives: Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma has a higher probability of relapse and recurrence. Classical clinicopathological parameters including the International Prognostic Score (IPS) have not been reliable in predicting prognosis or tailoring treatment. Since FDG PET/CT is the standard of care in staging Hodgkin Lymphoma, this study attempted to evaluate the clinical utility of baseline metabolic tumor parameters in a cohort of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III and IV).

Methods: Histology-proven advanced Hodgkin Patients presenting to our institute between 2012-2016 and treated with chemo-radiotherapy (ABVD / AEVD) were followed up till 2019. Quantitative PET/CT and clinicopathological parameters were used to estimate the Event Free Survival (EFS) in 100 patients. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to compare the survival times of prognostic factors.

Results: At a median follow-up of 48.83 months (IQR:33.31-63.05 months), the five-year-EFS was 81%. Of the 100 patients, 16 had relapsed (16%) and none died at the last follow-up. On Univariate analysis, among non-PET parameters bulky disease (P=0.03) and B-symptoms (P=0.04) were significant while among PET/CT parameters SUVmax (p=0.001), SUVmean (P=0.002), WBMTV2.5 (P<0.001), WBMTV41% (P<0.001), WBTLG2.5 (P<0.001) and WBTLG41% (P <0.001) predicted poorer EFS. 5-year EFS for patients with low WBMTV2.5 [<1038.3 cm3] was 89% and 35% for patients with high WBMTV2.5 [≥1038.3 cm3] (p <0.001). In a multivariate model, only WBMTV2.5 (P=0.03) independently predicted poorer EFS.

Conclusion: PET-based metabolic parameter (WBMTV2.5) was able to prognosticate and complement the classical clinical prognostic factors in advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma. This parameter could have a surrogate value for prognosticating advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Better prognostication at baseline translates to tailored or risk-modified treatment and hence higher survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of IgG4-producing MALT lymphoma with multiple site involvement. 99mTc-Sn-colloid SPECT/CT in thoracic splenosis after esophageal cancer surgery. A practical method for assessing quantitative scanner accuracy with long-lived radionuclides: The ARTnet insert. Assessment of awareness and knowledge regarding nuclear medicine and appropriate use of Nuclear medicine modalities, among medical students and faculty members in two academic medical institutes in North India: A Cross sectional Study. Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging in detection of invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1