意大利北部COVID-19妇女队列的助产护理:大流行的两年

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Minerva obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-16 DOI:10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05328-9
Viviana Lira, Laura Beltrami, Francesca Cirimbelli, Laura Garbelli, Camilla Merlo, Elena A Prandelli, Massimiliano Sanfilippo, Nives E Peli
{"title":"意大利北部COVID-19妇女队列的助产护理:大流行的两年","authors":"Viviana Lira, Laura Beltrami, Francesca Cirimbelli, Laura Garbelli, Camilla Merlo, Elena A Prandelli, Massimiliano Sanfilippo, Nives E Peli","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05328-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rapid development of the COVID-19 pandemic has altered the context of healthcare around the world. SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant and postnatal women, being at greater risk of complications, require continuous midwifery surveillance as well as specialized medical care. Scientific literature lacks studies related to midwifery care models in hospital settings during the pandemic. The aim of this work is to describe hospitalizations in an obstetric-gynecological COVID care unit and to provide a descriptive analysis of the organizational and care model adopted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort retrospective descriptive study was carried out. The sample was stratified by COVID-related care complexity and by obstetric risk. The sample recruited pregnant women, postnatal women, and gynecological patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to the obstetric-gynecological COVID unit of a birth center in Northern Italy, from March 16, 2020, to March 16, 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A number of 1037 women were hospitalized, and of these, 551 were SARS-CoV-2 positive women. The 551 SARS-CoV-2 positive women included 362 pregnant women, 132 postnatal women, 9 gynecological patients with medical diagnosis while 17 with a surgical path, and 31 women undergoing voluntary interruption of pregnancy. The final sample included 536 women. 68.6% of women requested a low care complexity, 22.8% a medium one, and 8.6% a high care complexity. Among the obstetric women population, the majority (70.6%) showed a high obstetric risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 cohort of women required different levels of care with various care complexity and levels of obstetric risk. The model adopted allowed the acquisition of new technical and professional skills as well as the sharing of responsibilities and competences according to the care model of the Buddy System. Future studies could investigate COVID-related care models adopted internationally, but also deepen the technical and professional skills developed by midwives during the pandemic in order to enrich, improve and support midwifery profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midwifery care for a COVID-19 cohort of women in Northern Italy: two years of pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Viviana Lira, Laura Beltrami, Francesca Cirimbelli, Laura Garbelli, Camilla Merlo, Elena A Prandelli, Massimiliano Sanfilippo, Nives E Peli\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05328-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rapid development of the COVID-19 pandemic has altered the context of healthcare around the world. SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant and postnatal women, being at greater risk of complications, require continuous midwifery surveillance as well as specialized medical care. Scientific literature lacks studies related to midwifery care models in hospital settings during the pandemic. The aim of this work is to describe hospitalizations in an obstetric-gynecological COVID care unit and to provide a descriptive analysis of the organizational and care model adopted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort retrospective descriptive study was carried out. The sample was stratified by COVID-related care complexity and by obstetric risk. The sample recruited pregnant women, postnatal women, and gynecological patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to the obstetric-gynecological COVID unit of a birth center in Northern Italy, from March 16, 2020, to March 16, 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A number of 1037 women were hospitalized, and of these, 551 were SARS-CoV-2 positive women. The 551 SARS-CoV-2 positive women included 362 pregnant women, 132 postnatal women, 9 gynecological patients with medical diagnosis while 17 with a surgical path, and 31 women undergoing voluntary interruption of pregnancy. The final sample included 536 women. 68.6% of women requested a low care complexity, 22.8% a medium one, and 8.6% a high care complexity. Among the obstetric women population, the majority (70.6%) showed a high obstetric risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 cohort of women required different levels of care with various care complexity and levels of obstetric risk. The model adopted allowed the acquisition of new technical and professional skills as well as the sharing of responsibilities and competences according to the care model of the Buddy System. Future studies could investigate COVID-related care models adopted internationally, but also deepen the technical and professional skills developed by midwives during the pandemic in order to enrich, improve and support midwifery profession.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05328-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05328-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19大流行的快速发展改变了世界各地的卫生保健环境。SARS-CoV-2阳性孕妇和产后妇女出现并发症的风险更大,需要持续的助产监测以及专门的医疗护理。科学文献缺乏与大流行期间医院助产护理模式相关的研究。这项工作的目的是描述妇产科COVID护理单位的住院情况,并对所采用的组织和护理模式进行描述性分析。方法:采用队列回顾性描述性研究。按covid - 19相关护理复杂性和产科风险对样本进行分层。该样本招募了2020年3月16日至2022年3月16日期间在意大利北部一家分娩中心的妇产科COVID病房就诊的孕妇、产后妇女和确诊为SARS-CoV-2感染的妇科患者。结果:1037名妇女住院,其中551名是SARS-CoV-2阳性妇女。551例SARS-CoV-2阳性妇女中,孕妇362例,产后132例,内科诊断妇科9例,手术路径17例,自愿终止妊娠31例。最终的样本包括536名女性。68.6%的女性要求低护理复杂性,22.8%的女性要求中等护理复杂性,8.6%的女性要求高护理复杂性。在产科妇女人口中,大多数(70.6%)显示出较高的产科风险。结论:COVID-19妇女队列需要不同水平的护理,护理复杂性和产科风险水平各不相同。所采用的模式允许获得新的技术和专业技能,并根据伙伴制度的护理模式分担责任和能力。未来的研究可以调查国际上采用的与covid - 19相关的护理模式,但也可以深化助产士在大流行期间发展的技术和专业技能,以丰富、改进和支持助产专业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Midwifery care for a COVID-19 cohort of women in Northern Italy: two years of pandemic.

Background: The rapid development of the COVID-19 pandemic has altered the context of healthcare around the world. SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant and postnatal women, being at greater risk of complications, require continuous midwifery surveillance as well as specialized medical care. Scientific literature lacks studies related to midwifery care models in hospital settings during the pandemic. The aim of this work is to describe hospitalizations in an obstetric-gynecological COVID care unit and to provide a descriptive analysis of the organizational and care model adopted.

Methods: A cohort retrospective descriptive study was carried out. The sample was stratified by COVID-related care complexity and by obstetric risk. The sample recruited pregnant women, postnatal women, and gynecological patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to the obstetric-gynecological COVID unit of a birth center in Northern Italy, from March 16, 2020, to March 16, 2022.

Results: A number of 1037 women were hospitalized, and of these, 551 were SARS-CoV-2 positive women. The 551 SARS-CoV-2 positive women included 362 pregnant women, 132 postnatal women, 9 gynecological patients with medical diagnosis while 17 with a surgical path, and 31 women undergoing voluntary interruption of pregnancy. The final sample included 536 women. 68.6% of women requested a low care complexity, 22.8% a medium one, and 8.6% a high care complexity. Among the obstetric women population, the majority (70.6%) showed a high obstetric risk.

Conclusions: The COVID-19 cohort of women required different levels of care with various care complexity and levels of obstetric risk. The model adopted allowed the acquisition of new technical and professional skills as well as the sharing of responsibilities and competences according to the care model of the Buddy System. Future studies could investigate COVID-related care models adopted internationally, but also deepen the technical and professional skills developed by midwives during the pandemic in order to enrich, improve and support midwifery profession.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
期刊最新文献
The predictive role of uterocervical angle in labor outcomes: a narrative review. Intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich-plasma: myth or reality? Age and phytoestrogen use, but not resilience, influence urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women. Assessment of ovarian cortex follicles in chemotherapy naïve and chemotherapy exposed patients. Intrauterine device use in adolescence: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1