用于产前母体血清筛选的单克隆非偶联雌三醇抗体的验证。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Medical Screening Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/09691413231160109
Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian, Jonathan P Bestwick, Nicholas J Wald
{"title":"用于产前母体血清筛选的单克隆非偶联雌三醇抗体的验证。","authors":"Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian,&nbsp;Jonathan P Bestwick,&nbsp;Nicholas J Wald","doi":"10.1177/09691413231160109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Unconjugated estriol (uE3) is used as a marker for fetal aneuploidy in maternal serum screening tests. The goal of this study was to examine the validity of a new immunoassay for uE3 that uses a monoclonal antibody (m-uE3) rather than the more commonly used polyclonal antibody (p-uE3).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Assays were performed in the Special Chemistry laboratory at Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Residual fresh (<i>n</i> = 100) and frozen (<i>n</i> = 533) second trimester serum samples from routine clinical care were tested using p-uE3 and/or m-uE3 assays. Assay results were compared between methods using Bland-Altman plots. A median equation was developed for m-uE3 results. Down syndrome risks were compared between the two assays in a case-control sample set (21 cases each matched with five controls for the completed week of gestation, duration of freezer storage and race).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Log-transformed serum uE3 levels were highly correlated between the assays (<i>r</i> = 0.93, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with the m-uE3 assay levels yielding, on average, 23% higher (standard deviation of differences in log uE3 concentrations = 0.07) results. Assay and gestation-based median equations were calculated and used to convert m-uE3 concentrations to multiples of the median (MoM). The m-uE3 MoM values fit a log Gaussian distribution well with a log standard deviation of 0.11. Down syndrome risk results were not significantly different between assays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The m-uE3 assay, with results expressed in MoMs, is suitable for screening and as a monoclonal-based assay offers the advantage of a predictable and indefinite supply of antibody to perform the assay.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":"30 3","pages":"120-124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a monoclonal unconjugated estriol antibody for use in prenatal maternal serum screening.\",\"authors\":\"Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian,&nbsp;Jonathan P Bestwick,&nbsp;Nicholas J Wald\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09691413231160109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Unconjugated estriol (uE3) is used as a marker for fetal aneuploidy in maternal serum screening tests. The goal of this study was to examine the validity of a new immunoassay for uE3 that uses a monoclonal antibody (m-uE3) rather than the more commonly used polyclonal antibody (p-uE3).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Assays were performed in the Special Chemistry laboratory at Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Residual fresh (<i>n</i> = 100) and frozen (<i>n</i> = 533) second trimester serum samples from routine clinical care were tested using p-uE3 and/or m-uE3 assays. Assay results were compared between methods using Bland-Altman plots. A median equation was developed for m-uE3 results. Down syndrome risks were compared between the two assays in a case-control sample set (21 cases each matched with five controls for the completed week of gestation, duration of freezer storage and race).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Log-transformed serum uE3 levels were highly correlated between the assays (<i>r</i> = 0.93, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with the m-uE3 assay levels yielding, on average, 23% higher (standard deviation of differences in log uE3 concentrations = 0.07) results. Assay and gestation-based median equations were calculated and used to convert m-uE3 concentrations to multiples of the median (MoM). The m-uE3 MoM values fit a log Gaussian distribution well with a log standard deviation of 0.11. Down syndrome risk results were not significantly different between assays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The m-uE3 assay, with results expressed in MoMs, is suitable for screening and as a monoclonal-based assay offers the advantage of a predictable and indefinite supply of antibody to perform the assay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"120-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413231160109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413231160109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:非共轭雌三醇(uE3)在母体血清筛选试验中被用作胎儿非整倍体的标记。本研究的目的是检验使用单克隆抗体(m-uE3)而不是更常用的多克隆抗体(p-uE3)的新型uE3免疫测定的有效性。环境:测定在罗德岛妇女和婴儿医院的特殊化学实验室进行。方法:采用p-uE3和/或m-uE3检测常规临床护理的剩余新鲜(n = 100)和冷冻(n = 533)妊娠中期血清样本。采用Bland-Altman图比较两种方法的测定结果。为m-uE3结果建立了中位数方程。在一个病例-对照样本集(21例,每例与5例对照,包括妊娠周、冷冻保存时间和种族)中比较两种检测方法的唐氏综合征风险。结果:对数转化的血清uE3水平在两种检测方法之间高度相关(r = 0.93, p)。结论:m-uE3检测结果以mom表达,适合于筛选,并且作为一种基于单克隆的检测方法,具有可预测和无限期供应抗体的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a monoclonal unconjugated estriol antibody for use in prenatal maternal serum screening.

Objectives: Unconjugated estriol (uE3) is used as a marker for fetal aneuploidy in maternal serum screening tests. The goal of this study was to examine the validity of a new immunoassay for uE3 that uses a monoclonal antibody (m-uE3) rather than the more commonly used polyclonal antibody (p-uE3).

Setting: Assays were performed in the Special Chemistry laboratory at Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island.

Methods: Residual fresh (n = 100) and frozen (n = 533) second trimester serum samples from routine clinical care were tested using p-uE3 and/or m-uE3 assays. Assay results were compared between methods using Bland-Altman plots. A median equation was developed for m-uE3 results. Down syndrome risks were compared between the two assays in a case-control sample set (21 cases each matched with five controls for the completed week of gestation, duration of freezer storage and race).

Results: Log-transformed serum uE3 levels were highly correlated between the assays (r = 0.93, p < 0.001), with the m-uE3 assay levels yielding, on average, 23% higher (standard deviation of differences in log uE3 concentrations = 0.07) results. Assay and gestation-based median equations were calculated and used to convert m-uE3 concentrations to multiples of the median (MoM). The m-uE3 MoM values fit a log Gaussian distribution well with a log standard deviation of 0.11. Down syndrome risk results were not significantly different between assays.

Conclusions: The m-uE3 assay, with results expressed in MoMs, is suitable for screening and as a monoclonal-based assay offers the advantage of a predictable and indefinite supply of antibody to perform the assay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
期刊最新文献
Age-specific differences in tumour characteristics between screen-detected and non-screen-detected breast cancers in women aged 40-74 at diagnosis in Sweden from 2008 to 2017. Association between time to colonoscopy after positive fecal testing and colorectal cancer outcomes in Alberta, Canada. Cancer screening programs in Japan: Progress and challenges. Strong association between reduction of late-stage cancers and reduction of cancer-specific mortality in meta-regression of randomized screening trials across multiple cancer types. Factors associated with private or public breast cancer screening attendance in Queensland, Australia: A retrospective cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1