{"title":"从负责任的卫生社区增加种族和卫生公平的经验教训。","authors":"Brandon G Wilson, Emily Jones","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Accountable Health Communities model (AHC) was developed to test whether systematically screening for health-related social needs and referrals to community-based organizations to resolve unmet needs would affect healthcare use and costs for CMS beneficiaries. Purpose: The AHC model required applicants to develop Disparities Impact Statements (DIS), to increase the model's potential impact on health equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Authors conducted a thematic analysis of awardees' DISs to identify minority and underserved populations of focus, and the strategies awardees used to increase equitable participation in the model by minority and underserved populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most awardees focused on multiple minority and underserved populations and used multipronged innovative strategies to pursue equity goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering recent health equity advancements as Executive Order 13985 and the release of CMS Innovation Center's Strategy Refresh, with highlights of health equity best practices from the AHC model, assessing use of DISs in the AHC model provides valuable lessons. Implications: Given HHS' broadscale promotion of DISs adoption as a viable quality improvement approach to achieving health equity, disseminating how the tool was used by a myriad of organizational types in the AHC model is critically important to improving future efforts to increase equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"44 5","pages":"276-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons on Increasing Racial and Health Equity From Accountable Health Communities.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon G Wilson, Emily Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Accountable Health Communities model (AHC) was developed to test whether systematically screening for health-related social needs and referrals to community-based organizations to resolve unmet needs would affect healthcare use and costs for CMS beneficiaries. Purpose: The AHC model required applicants to develop Disparities Impact Statements (DIS), to increase the model's potential impact on health equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Authors conducted a thematic analysis of awardees' DISs to identify minority and underserved populations of focus, and the strategies awardees used to increase equitable participation in the model by minority and underserved populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most awardees focused on multiple minority and underserved populations and used multipronged innovative strategies to pursue equity goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering recent health equity advancements as Executive Order 13985 and the release of CMS Innovation Center's Strategy Refresh, with highlights of health equity best practices from the AHC model, assessing use of DISs in the AHC model provides valuable lessons. Implications: Given HHS' broadscale promotion of DISs adoption as a viable quality improvement approach to achieving health equity, disseminating how the tool was used by a myriad of organizational types in the AHC model is critically important to improving future efforts to increase equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"276-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000356\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lessons on Increasing Racial and Health Equity From Accountable Health Communities.
Background: The Accountable Health Communities model (AHC) was developed to test whether systematically screening for health-related social needs and referrals to community-based organizations to resolve unmet needs would affect healthcare use and costs for CMS beneficiaries. Purpose: The AHC model required applicants to develop Disparities Impact Statements (DIS), to increase the model's potential impact on health equity.
Methods: Authors conducted a thematic analysis of awardees' DISs to identify minority and underserved populations of focus, and the strategies awardees used to increase equitable participation in the model by minority and underserved populations.
Results: Most awardees focused on multiple minority and underserved populations and used multipronged innovative strategies to pursue equity goals.
Conclusions: Considering recent health equity advancements as Executive Order 13985 and the release of CMS Innovation Center's Strategy Refresh, with highlights of health equity best practices from the AHC model, assessing use of DISs in the AHC model provides valuable lessons. Implications: Given HHS' broadscale promotion of DISs adoption as a viable quality improvement approach to achieving health equity, disseminating how the tool was used by a myriad of organizational types in the AHC model is critically important to improving future efforts to increase equity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®.
The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as:
Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform