尊严治疗在文化上有能力的护理背景下对有姑息治疗需求的人的有效性:系统综述的系统综述。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/SPC.0000000000000664
Bridget Johnston, C Fulya Dönmez, Miguel Julião
{"title":"尊严治疗在文化上有能力的护理背景下对有姑息治疗需求的人的有效性:系统综述的系统综述。","authors":"Bridget Johnston,&nbsp;C Fulya Dönmez,&nbsp;Miguel Julião","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to synthesise the evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the efficacy of dignity therapy (DT) in relation to psychosocial and spiritual outcomes in the context of person-centred and culturally competent care for people with supportive and palliative care needs.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Thirteen reviews were found, including seven conducted by nurses. Most reviews were of high quality, including various study populations such as cancer, motor neurone disease and non-malignant conditions. Six psychosocial and spiritual outcomes were identified: quality of life, anxiety, depression, hopefulness, meaning and purpose in life, and suffering based on the cultural variations in the implementation of DT.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>DT has a positive impact on anxiety, depression, suffering, and meaning and purpose in life for people with palliative care needs, but the evidence is somewhat conflicted as to whether DT is effective in improving hope, quality of life and spiritual outcomes in the context of culturally competent care. Nurse-led DT seems desirable given its pivotal role when caring for people with palliative care needs. More randomised controlled trials should be conducted for people with different cultural backgrounds to provide person-centred, culturally competent supportive and palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":"17 3","pages":"186-192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of dignity therapy in the context of culturally competent care in people with palliative care needs: a systematic review of systematic reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Bridget Johnston,&nbsp;C Fulya Dönmez,&nbsp;Miguel Julião\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to synthesise the evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the efficacy of dignity therapy (DT) in relation to psychosocial and spiritual outcomes in the context of person-centred and culturally competent care for people with supportive and palliative care needs.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Thirteen reviews were found, including seven conducted by nurses. Most reviews were of high quality, including various study populations such as cancer, motor neurone disease and non-malignant conditions. Six psychosocial and spiritual outcomes were identified: quality of life, anxiety, depression, hopefulness, meaning and purpose in life, and suffering based on the cultural variations in the implementation of DT.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>DT has a positive impact on anxiety, depression, suffering, and meaning and purpose in life for people with palliative care needs, but the evidence is somewhat conflicted as to whether DT is effective in improving hope, quality of life and spiritual outcomes in the context of culturally competent care. Nurse-led DT seems desirable given its pivotal role when caring for people with palliative care needs. More randomised controlled trials should be conducted for people with different cultural backgrounds to provide person-centred, culturally competent supportive and palliative care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"186-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000664\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

综述目的:本综述旨在综合来自系统综述和荟萃分析的证据,这些证据涉及尊严治疗(DT)在以人为本和文化主管的背景下,对有支持性和姑息治疗需求的人的社会心理和精神结果的影响。最近发现:发现13篇评论,其中7篇由护士进行。大多数综述都是高质量的,包括各种研究人群,如癌症、运动神经元疾病和非恶性疾病。确定了六种社会心理和精神结果:生活质量,焦虑,抑郁,希望,生活的意义和目的,以及基于实施DT的文化差异的痛苦。总结:对于有姑息治疗需求的人来说,DT对焦虑、抑郁、痛苦以及生活的意义和目的有积极的影响,但关于DT是否在文化上有能力的护理背景下有效地改善希望、生活质量和精神结果,证据有些矛盾。护士主导的DT似乎是可取的,因为它在照顾有姑息治疗需求的人时起着关键作用。应该对不同文化背景的人进行更多的随机对照试验,以提供以人为本、符合文化要求的支持性和姑息治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of dignity therapy in the context of culturally competent care in people with palliative care needs: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

Purpose of review: This review aims to synthesise the evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the efficacy of dignity therapy (DT) in relation to psychosocial and spiritual outcomes in the context of person-centred and culturally competent care for people with supportive and palliative care needs.

Recent findings: Thirteen reviews were found, including seven conducted by nurses. Most reviews were of high quality, including various study populations such as cancer, motor neurone disease and non-malignant conditions. Six psychosocial and spiritual outcomes were identified: quality of life, anxiety, depression, hopefulness, meaning and purpose in life, and suffering based on the cultural variations in the implementation of DT.

Summary: DT has a positive impact on anxiety, depression, suffering, and meaning and purpose in life for people with palliative care needs, but the evidence is somewhat conflicted as to whether DT is effective in improving hope, quality of life and spiritual outcomes in the context of culturally competent care. Nurse-led DT seems desirable given its pivotal role when caring for people with palliative care needs. More randomised controlled trials should be conducted for people with different cultural backgrounds to provide person-centred, culturally competent supportive and palliative care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
期刊最新文献
Palliative radiation therapy for locally advanced breast cancer. The use of precision radiotherapy for the management of cancer related pain in the abdomen. Advances in breathlessness support services for people with serious illness. Bridging the care gap: radiation therapy in elderly and frail cancer patients. The gut microbiome and the brain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1